On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 04:35:29PM -0700, Doug Hardie wrote:
> I have an unusual situation that I suspect is not practical, but just in
> case...
>
> I have a class C network with a T1 to the internet. There are a number of
> hosts on that network. Unfortunately the T1 line is just part of a pa
On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 05:03:03AM -0300, Celso Viana wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have 2 machines (A and B) interconnected by a cable network
> crossover; added the following addresses on the network card:
>
> Machine "A": 192.168.1.1/24
> Machine "B": 10.10.1.1/24
>
> Question: How would for these m
On Sun, Nov 25, 2007 at 10:03:30PM -0600, eBoundHost: Artur wrote:
>
> Wow neal, that's very nice of you. are you saying that hitler didn't do any
> of these things? I'm not even going to respond to you here, just going to
> re-post your words to show that there are still people like you out t
On Sun, Oct 14, 2007 at 12:37:43AM +0100, RW wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Oct 2007 22:57:25 -0500
> Dave Curry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi. I was wondering if anyone had any idea what might be causing
> > excessive CPU usage by the rp-pppoe dialer. What I've be
Hi. I was wondering if anyone had any idea what might be causing excessive CPU
usage by the rp-pppoe dialer. What I've been running into is since the
5th, the message "Unexpected packet code 9" has been showing up every 10
seconds in syslog, the CPU usage is maxed, I seem to be getting pinged b
