tmontools port and a direct checkout from their
SVN, and I'm getting very similar error messages. From the changelog and
the manpage it looks like some work has been done to make this work.
/Daniel Eriksson
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
Mark Stapper wrote:
> So I see. Could this be why I haven't had any read errors anymore?
> (After the zpool scrub that is)
Possibly, but in that case the SMART selftest should pass also. Have you
tried a selftest after you did the scrub?
/Dani
ests?
In this case it's not really clearing the drive you are aiming for, it
is to write to every sector. If you have a failed sector (which you do),
writing to it will force the drive firmware to remap the sector. As far
as I know, most drives will not remap an unreadable sector until it is
writt
is I would then run a 'zpool scrub ...'. If the scrub
finishes without checksum errors and without any ATA-related errors the
drive is probably in good enough condition to keep using, but watch out
for more ATA errors. If the drive is dying it won't be
nectors. If you do
#1 then you need a RocketRAID card to access the data on the drive.
/Daniel Eriksson
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
create a
partition table on it, then reconnect it to your RR2310 card.
Partition table example:
# gpart create -t GPT adXX
# gpart add -b YY -s ZZ -t freebsd-ufs adXX
/Daniel Eriksson
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/
alfway through with a division-by-zero error. I haven't tried it on any
500 GB drives yet.
/Daniel Eriksson
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
problem and if it would affect a typical web
server. It does not seem to affect any of my fileservers (exporting NFS).
/Daniel Eriksson
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsub
"1024M"
vm.kmem_size_max="1024M"
vfs.zfs.arc_max="512M"
vfs.zfs.prefetch_disable=1
5. edit /etc/rc.conf and add zfs_enable="YES"
6. reboot
7. be happy!
(With 16 GB memory you can probably use larger values for slightly
better performance in step #4 above.)
/
cause of its
size. I'm not sure how well gjournal handles fsck of large filesystems.
Personally I'm going with ZFS for my next large array (8x750GB).
/Daniel Eriksson
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailm
Why are you not using the supplied scripts and configuration knobs to
start Sendmail? It works just fine for 99% of FreeBSD users (my guess),
so what makes your environment so special that your needs cannot be met
without custom scripts?
/Daniel Eriksson
p)
and change the smart host line like you already have done:
define(`SMART_HOST', `mx2.optonline.net')dnl
* make all install restart
* try to send mail again
/Daniel Eriksson
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/
6. restart the jails
This should work, right? Or am I missing something? (One of the jails is
a mysql server, the rest are www servers.)
/Daniel Eriksson
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/
(analog, webalizer, php
with the gd extension, ...). I just installed a new webserver with
multiple jails to keep the different sites compartmentalized, and
avoiding the xorg-libs saved me a ton of space and compile time.
/Daniel Eriksson
___
freebsd-
imit on the number of mountpoint.
>
> Google hasn't been much help, and I thought I'd ask here before I dug
in to
> the sourcecode. I'm wondering if there's an upper limit (either hard
or
> practical) on the number of mountpoints on a system?
I have a box running 6-STA
I've started using GPT for everything but the system disk.
To add a GPT table to a new disk and create a partition in that table
that spans the entire disk, all you need to do is this:
# gpt create /dev/adX
# gpt add /dev/adX
# newfs -O2 -U /dev/adXp1
Done!
/Daniel Eri
when zfs will hit the regular CVS tree?
/Daniel Eriksson
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
but zfs is only for
current afaik.)
When will gjournal and zfs be committed to the CVS tree? Will either of
them be merged to STABLE?
/Daniel Eriksson
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freeb
stall what
you need.
/Daniel Eriksson
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
u could try is to use square brackets around the
mailrelay, like so:
define(`SMART_HOST', `[mailrelay.myisp.com]')
This will force Sendmail to connect directly to that host, instead of
doing a DNS lookup for MX pointers.
/Daniel Eriksson
___
freebsd
mydomain.com.mc)
edit this file and uncomment the SMART_HOST line and insert an
SMTP server that will relay mail for you
example: define(`SMART_HOST', `mailrelay.myisp.com')
make cf install restart
Done!
/Daniel Eriksson
___
freebsd-questions
. However, polling mode
means no interrupts so the ISR is never called(?).
/Daniel Eriksson
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
ream speed during full upstream saturation).
My question is: Do I need to tell the pipe how fat it is (${fwcmd} pipe 1
config bw 10Mbit/s) to get the queue prioritization to work properly, or is
it OK to leave out the speed and just let it run full tilt?
/Danie
ave not noticed any significant slowdown. Under what usecase(s) is it
slow? (My usage is mainly for medium to large files, with <200 files per
directory.)
/Daniel Eriksson
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/ma
rk
properly in my server (with regards to building arrays from BIOS and similar
tasks). How about firmware upgrades of the card and/or the discs? Can that
be done without a Proliant server?
I would appreciate any information!
/Daniel Eriksson
___
[EMAI
Jeremy Faulkner wrote:
> What international standard describes their format?
>
> Windows is not a standard.
Many times a de-facto standard is just as important/valid as a "real"
standard.
/Daniel Eriksson
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED
hey are all (?) outside
of the normal procedures for using and maintaining RAID arrays.
/Daniel Eriksson
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
ee no errors at all.
If the disc isn't physically broken, then the proper way to get your array
back to the original "all up" state, you should run a "vinum start
backup.p0.s3". I'm not sure if this will rebuild all the data
affected a lot depending on
what controller is used? For example would there be any performance
difference (transfer speed and/or system resource usage) between ataraid on
a HPT374-based card (such as the Highpoint RocketRAID 454) and one of the
new Promise cards (which we have really good drivers for
29 matches
Mail list logo
