That's also good to know. Thanks for the information.
--
Csaba Henk
My sense of humour is often too subtle to cope with getting smileyd.
Please don't take it personal.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd
ing is not a "free bonus" which comes with softupdates, but
a new innovation based on that... and is a true FBSD innovation. So I'd
guess it's still a unique thing.
--
Csaba Henk
My sense of humour is often too subtle to cope with getting smileyd.
Please don't take it per
dump manpage didn't have such a -L flag...)
--
Csaba Henk
My sense of humour is often too subtle to cope with getting smileyd.
Please don't take it personal.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/ma
ng
dumped and then does a dump of the snapshot.
I don't see how the temporary snapshot can improve the
reliability/consistency/correctness of the dump. Could someone explain
this?
--
Csaba Henk
My sense of humour is often too subtle to cope with getting smileyd
unds scary...
TYA.
--
Csaba Henk
My sense of humour is often too subtle to cope with getting smileyd.
Please don't take it personal.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubs
On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 11:19:03AM -0500, Eric Schuele wrote:
> Csaba Henk wrote:
> >Because all such scripts are fundamentally broken.
> >
> >When make decides which ports to pull in, it doesn't only use the flat
> >data of build and run dependencies, b
On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 04:14:40PM +0300, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
> Either submit a followup to the PR requesting that it's reopened and
> adding your feedback at the end of the followup, or submit a new PR
> (with a reference to the old one, if you feel that's appropriate).
Thanks, I submitted a
Hi!
I had some problem with my digicam. I found a PR which described the
phenomena and gave a workaround, too. (PR i386/76653, see
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=i386/76653
).
As I see, feedback was asked for but it didn't come... hence finally the
PR has been closed. Now I have the
On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 11:55:28AM -0500, Eric Schuele wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Some time back I posted a question regarding how to determine what
> ports/packages would need to be installed on my machine when I install a
> new (new to the local machine) port.
>
> For example, if I do not presently h
I sent the following post to freebsd-current, but maybe it's better to
be sent to questions -- the problem of dumping as such is not a
current-specific question...
> Hi!
>
> I tried to install both RELENG-6 and CURRENT, and both kernels behaved
> the same way: panicked quite early (before init) w
On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 10:47:50AM -0700, Daniel Malaby wrote:
> The sample data has 9 fields, I am trying to sort on the fifth field,
> here is what I have tried.
>
> sort -t\t +4 -5 -o test.txt sample.txt
>
> I did try removing the space and it did not work, I have also tried
> removing the -
On Mon, Jul 04, 2005 at 06:03:43PM +0800, Crucis wrote:
> Is there a BSD equivalent of the Linux "fuser" command?
> fuser is used to identify processes using files/sockets.i
There is fstat in the base system.
Csaba
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mail
On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 12:18:49PM -0400, Chad Morland wrote:
> I am having problems getting mod_python and apache2 ports to work properly.
>
> Here are the relevant ports that I have installed:
> apache-2.0.54
> mod_python-3.1.4_1
> python-2.4.1_1
>
> When I try and start apache I get the follow
On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 01:05:32AM -0700, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
> This gives rise to a rather serious Catch-22 with FreeBSD:
>
> You need to really understand intimately how FreeBSD works
> and how computer software that runs on it works in order to
> get it to work well enough for you to learn
14 matches
Mail list logo
