On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 11:04 PM, Polytropon wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Jun 2013 19:38:34 +0200, Fernando Apesteguía wrote:
>> Since I updated to 9.1-RELEASE my boot process seems to stall for a
>> while. Booting in verbose mode shows messages like these ones:
>>
>> Opening device da0 -> 6 (repeated like 3
Hi Tim,
Double check what user clamd is run as, and what permissions your mail
spool have. Somewhere along the line your mail spool locked out clamd
The lstat system call's man page says
`execute (search) permission is required on all of the
directories in path that lead to the file.`
Also, do
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-
> questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of jb
> Sent: Monday, June 10, 2013 12:53 PM
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: Bourne shell "if" syntax
>
> Michael Sierchio tenebras.com> writes:
Walter Hurry writes:
> >> Fair enough. Point taken, thanks. Nevertheless I see no reason to
> >> compile stuff I neither want nor need.
> >
> >While I endorse the principle ... it can be difficult for the
> > casual user to know which parts can be removed without blowing up things
>
Thank you for purchasing tickets on Ticketmaster.Your order number for this
purchase is 06-89624/AUS.Complete order detail is attached to this e-mail.You
will receive your tickets via: International Express-Ticketmaster will mail
these within 2 business days of the booking.Tickets usually arrive
Thank you for purchasing tickets on Ticketmaster.Your order number for this
purchase is 18-00609/AUS.Complete order detail is attached to this e-mail.You
will receive your tickets via: International Express-Ticketmaster will mail
these within 2 business days of the booking.Tickets usually arrive
On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 4:27 PM, Lowell Gilbert <
freebsd-questions-lo...@be-well.ilk.org> wrote:
> Walter Hurry writes:
>
> > Ah, src.conf. That's what I missed!. Thank you so much Gary, and sorry if
> > it was a silly question.
>
> Bear in mind that you're only going to be able to shave a small
Michael Sierchio tenebras.com> writes:
> ...
> Right. Many scripts seem to assume that sh is bash, and that's
> certainly not the case here.
>
> if [ "x$BLAH" = "x" ]; then
>
> is the most reliable and portable way of determining if it's a string
> of zero length.
Actually this trick is not
On 06/10/2013 02:21 PM, dte...@freebsd.org wrote:
ctually, there's another reason you should also avoid the above (unquoted
parameter), and that's in the case of a multi-word value. For example:
Yup, that's the compelling case for using quoting.
--
-
> -Original Message-
> From: Devin Teske [mailto:devin.te...@fisglobal.com] On Behalf Of
> dte...@freebsd.org
> Sent: Monday, June 10, 2013 12:19 PM
> To: tun...@tundraware.com; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Cc: dte...@freebsd.org
> Subject: RE: Bourne shell "if" syntax
>
>
>
> > ---
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 12:16 PM, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
> That wasn't really my point. I use sentinels because in the face of an
> empty string this:
>
>if [ $PTR = "" ]
>
> Actually evaluates to:
>
>if [ = "" ]
>
> Which throws an error.
Right. Many scripts seem to assume that sh is bas
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-
> questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Tim Daneliuk
> Sent: Monday, June 10, 2013 12:17 PM
> To: dte...@freebsd.org
> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: Bourne shell "if" syntax
>
> On 06
On 06/10/2013 02:10 PM, dte...@freebsd.org wrote:
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-
questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Tim Daneliuk
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2013 12:06 PM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Bourne shell "if" s
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-
> questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Tim Daneliuk
> Sent: Monday, June 10, 2013 12:06 PM
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: Bourne shell "if" syntax
>
> On 06/10/2013 01:59 PM, dte...
On Mon, 10 Jun 2013 14:05:45 -0500, Tim Daneliuk
wrote:
if [ _"$PTR" == _ ] ; then
I've never seen this syntax before. Intriguing!
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
On 06/10/2013 01:59 PM, dte...@freebsd.org wrote:
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-
questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of lcon...@go2france.com
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2013 11:53 AM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Bourne shell "
On 06/10/2013 01:53 PM, lcon...@go2france.com wrote:
script fragment:
PTR=`dig @some.dns +short +norec -x a.b.c.d`
echo "$PTR"
if [ "$PTR" == "" ] ; then
echo "$PTR" >> /path/to/PTR_absent.txt
fi
===
output for an IP:
a-b-c-d.domain.net.
[: a-b-c-d.domain.net.: unexpecte
> -Original Message-
> From: Devin Teske [mailto:devin.te...@fisglobal.com] On Behalf Of
> dte...@freebsd.org
> Sent: Monday, June 10, 2013 11:59 AM
> To: lcon...@go2france.com; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Cc: Devin Teske
> Subject: RE: Bourne shell "if" syntax
>
>
>
> > -Origi
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-
> questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of lcon...@go2france.com
> Sent: Monday, June 10, 2013 11:53 AM
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Bourne shell "if" syntax
>
>
>
> script fragment:
>
script fragment:
PTR=`dig @some.dns +short +norec -x a.b.c.d`
echo "$PTR"
if [ "$PTR" == "" ] ; then
echo "$PTR" >> /path/to/PTR_absent.txt
fi
===
output for an IP:
a-b-c-d.domain.net.
[: a-b-c-d.domain.net.: unexpected operator
thanks
Len
_
On Sun, 09 Jun 2013 21:08:23 -0400, Robert Huff wrote:
> Walter Hurry writes:
>
>> Fair enough. Point taken, thanks. Nevertheless I see no reason to
>> compile stuff I neither want nor need.
>
> While I endorse the principle ... it can be difficult for the
> casual user to know which par
I am working on a FBSD 9.1-STABLE mail machine that's been working
fine. After upgrading to MailScanner 4.84.5_3, we are now
suddenly seeing like this:
Clamd::ERROR:: UNKNOWN CLAMD RETURN ./lstat() failed: Permission denied.
ERROR :: /var/spool/MailScanner/incoming/68340
Any ideas what
According to freebsd-gnats-sub...@freebsd.org on Fri, 06/07/13 at 06:40:
> Thank you very much for your problem report.
> It has the internal identification `www/179397'.
> The individual assigned to look at your
> report is: freebsd-www.
>
> You can access the state of your problem report at any
Re: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2013-June/251607.html
This has nothing to do with FreeBSD 9.0 vs. 9.1 other than the fact that
the package on 9.0 is older than 9.1. Instead, this has everything to
do with the difference between bash versions you're using. Remember:
packa
Hello!
Tell me please, can i setting coredumps write mechanism for write only
stack of programm and current frame?
--
Respectfully,
Stanislav Putrya
System administrator
FotoStrana.Ru Ltd.
ICQ IM: 328585847
Jabber-GoogleTalk: root.vagner
mob.phone SPB: +79215788755
mob.phone RND: +79525600664
ema
On my 9.0-based machines, if I typed $HOME[tab] when typing a command
in bash, the $HOME would be overwritten by the actual path to my home
directory (the value of $HOME) and tab completion would work as
expected.
After a fresh 9.1 install, this does not work as well.
$HOME is still detected by c
26 matches
Mail list logo
