Sadly, the command I ran did nothing - no error message, no output, no
result:
# zpool import -D -f -R /bsdr -N -F -n -X 12018916494219117471 newname
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/ZFS-recover-destroyed-zpool-what-are-the-available-options-tp5800299p580185
I think I might have a better understanding of the situation.
'zpool status' and 'zdb -C' commands both show bsdr properties as:
pool_guid: 17852168552651762162
children[0]: \ type: 'disk' \ guid: 12606749387939346898
Whereas 'zpool import -D' and 'zdb -l' commands give the bsdr properties as
Thank you for your help Volodymyr,
1. ZPOOL LIST shows that the pool is listed
NAMESIZE ALLOC FREECAP DEDUP HEALTH ALTROOT
bsdr - - - - - FAULTED -
tank0 49.8G 13.3G 36.5G26% 1.00x ONLINE -
2. ZPOOL IMPORT => no pools available to import
3. zpoo
05.04.2013 11:54, Beeblebrox:
Actually if you see all 4 labels correctly you can try to proceed as ZFS
would guess the correct disk size anyway.
I should clarify: # zdb -l /dev/ada0p2 => all 4 LABELS visible and correct
(zpool name: bsdr)
# zdb -l /dev/ada0p1 => all 4 LABELS visible and correc
sounds like a good idea, I might look into that, thnx.
Terje: zpool.cache is only 860 bytes, I don't think that should cause any
problems (?)
--
--
Joar Jegleim
Homepage: http://cosmicb.no
Linkedin: http://no.linkedin.com/in/joarjegleim
fb: http://www.facebook.com/joar.jeglei
>>Actually if you see all 4 labels correctly you can try to proceed as ZFS
would guess the correct disk size anyway.
I should clarify: # zdb -l /dev/ada0p2 => all 4 LABELS visible and correct
(zpool name: bsdr)
# zdb -l /dev/ada0p1 => all 4 LABELS visible and correct (zpool name: asp)
# zdb -l /
04.04.2013 19:26, Beeblebrox:
test them with `zdb -l device`. When the output would be correct - you
guessed your slice!
LABEL 1
version: 28
name: 'bsdr'
state: 2
txg: 10
pool_guid: 12018916494219117471
hostid: 219353660
On Thu, 04 Apr 2013 19:50:40 -0500
Joshua Isom wrote:
> Considering Debian's ported the "standard Linux userland" to the FreeBSD
> kernel, I'm wondering if it's possible/practical to use Debian inside of
> a jail instead of a Linux CentOS jail, which has been documented. I
> know some applica
Hi!
Joshua Isom writes:
> Considering Debian's ported the "standard Linux userland" to the
> FreeBSD kernel, I'm wondering if it's possible/practical to use Debian
> inside of a jail instead of a Linux CentOS jail, which has been
> documented. I know some applications are linux specific, but are
