In the last episode (Jan 16), Tim Daneliuk said:
> This is not really a FreeBSD problem ... in fact, it's happening on a
> Solaris 10 machine. But because the TCP stack and its userland interface
> came from BSD, I am hoping some kind soul might have an insight into
> what's going on ...
Solaris
Hello.
2013/01/17 00:55:33 +0400 Peter Vereshagin => To
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org :
PV> GL> If anyone wants to create a port for svn-export and send it my way for
PV> GL> review, I would be happy to do that. Otherwise, I expect to have a
PV> GL> look myself within the next few months.
PV>
Hello.
After upgrading to 9.1-RELEASE I'm seeing this message first in the
daily output.
Should I do anything to get rid of the message or is it ok?
Thanks
/Leslie
-
Removing old temporary files:
find: -delete: unlink(./.sujournal): Operation not pe
Hello.
2013/01/17 01:04:40 +0400 Peter Vereshagin => To
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org :
PV> CS> If you're using Subversion-1.7 on the client side, there's only one .svn
PV> Oops I didn't yet...
* meant having svn-1.6 about here.
Thank you.
--
Peter Vereshagin (http://vereshagin.org) pgp: 175
Hello.
2013/01/16 16:17:55 -0700 Warren Block => To Peter
Vereshagin :
WB> On Thu, 17 Jan 2013, Peter Vereshagin wrote:
WB> > 2013/01/16 15:24:00 -0500 Greg Larkin => To Peter
Vereshagin :
WB> > GL> Please see my message from a similar thread a few months ago for a
WB> > GL> possible solution:
This is not really a FreeBSD problem ... in fact, it's happening on
a Solaris 10 machine. But because the TCP stack and its userland
interface came from BSD, I am hoping some kind soul might have
an insight into what's going on ...
The machine in question does DNS lookups fine via dig or nslookup
On 15 January 2013 23:57, Eitan Adler wrote:
> Hi all.
>
>
> Running FreeBSD 9.1-Release, I am seeing some absurd hangs (10 minutes
> or more to open a file) with SIGINFO informing me that the process is
> stuck on zio->io_cv.
>
> Does anyone have any suggestions for what I want to look at to tune
On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 13:32:14 -0800, Thomas D. Dean wrote:
> On 01/16/13 10:41, Robert Bonomi wrote:
>
> > *precisely* and the format string had "%ld".
> > this IS a type mismatch, if a 'long' is a 64-bit value.
>
> The original code was compiled on a 32-bit machine for a 32-bit target.
> I tr
On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 10:21:03 -0800, Michael Sierchio wrote:
> Top posting for brevity - the fact is, the code in your original
> example is wrong. There are reasons to complain about argument size
> mismatches, esp. in print functions that call (versions of) malloc.
> You should cast the time_t va
On Thu, 17 Jan 2013, Peter Vereshagin wrote:
Hello.
2013/01/16 15:24:00 -0500 Greg Larkin => To Peter
Vereshagin :
GL> Please see my message from a similar thread a few months ago for a
GL> possible solution:
GL> http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.os.freebsd.questions/294398
ANother heck is I
On 01/16/13 10:41, Robert Bonomi wrote:
*precisely* and the format string had "%ld".
this IS a type mismatch, if a 'long' is a 64-bit value.
The original code was compiled on a 32-bit machine for a 32-bit target.
I tried %d, %ld, and %lld with the same result.
FALSE. Calculation is OK.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 1/16/13 3:55 PM, Peter Vereshagin wrote:
> Hello.
>
> 2013/01/16 15:24:00 -0500 Greg Larkin => To
> Peter Vereshagin : GL> On 1/16/13 3:07 PM, Peter Vereshagin wrote:
> GL> > 2013/01/16 13:51:42 -0600 "Joseph A. Nagy, Jr" GL> >
> => To Peter Ver
I want to understand what is going on inside of sparse files.
I have a test case set up.
I have a small directory tree set up containing just the systems running
libraries. The directory tree contains a copy of the following systems
directories, /bin. /lib, /libexec, /sbin, and /usr which has
Hello.
2013/01/16 15:24:00 -0500 Greg Larkin => To Peter
Vereshagin :
GL> Please see my message from a similar thread a few months ago for a
GL> possible solution:
GL> http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.os.freebsd.questions/294398
ANother heck is I can't see officially where can I search for the
Hello.
2013/01/16 11:47:30 -0800 Chuck Swiger => To Peter Vereshagin
:
CS> On Jan 16, 2013, at 11:35 AM, Peter Vereshagin wrote:
CS> [ ... ]
CS> > Over again: How could I 'svn checkout' the sources without those '.svn'
CS> > subdirectories in the each and every repo's subdirectories?
CS>
CS> If
Hello.
2013/01/16 15:24:00 -0500 Greg Larkin => To Peter
Vereshagin :
GL> On 1/16/13 3:07 PM, Peter Vereshagin wrote:
GL> > 2013/01/16 13:51:42 -0600 "Joseph A. Nagy, Jr"
GL> > => To Peter Vereshagin : JANJ> On 01/16/13
GL> > 13:35, Peter Vereshagin wrote: JANJ> > 2013/01/16 13:19:19 -0600
G
On Jan 16, 2013, at 11:35 AM, Peter Vereshagin wrote:
[ ... ]
> Over again: How could I 'svn checkout' the sources without those '.svn'
> subdirectories in the each and every repo's subdirectories?
If you're using Subversion-1.7 on the client side, there's only one .svn
subdirectory at the top lev
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 1/16/13 3:07 PM, Peter Vereshagin wrote:
> Hello.
>
> 2013/01/16 13:51:42 -0600 "Joseph A. Nagy, Jr"
> => To Peter Vereshagin : JANJ> On 01/16/13
> 13:35, Peter Vereshagin wrote: JANJ> > 2013/01/16 13:19:19 -0600
> "Joseph A. Nagy, Jr" => To P
Hello.
2013/01/16 13:51:42 -0600 "Joseph A. Nagy, Jr" => To
Peter Vereshagin :
JANJ> On 01/16/13 13:35, Peter Vereshagin wrote:
JANJ> > 2013/01/16 13:19:19 -0600 "Joseph A. Nagy, Jr"
=> To Peter Vereshagin :
JANJ> > JANJ> On 01/16/13 12:58, Peter Vereshagin wrote:
JANJ> > JANJ> > Hello.
JANJ>
On 01/16/13 13:35, Peter Vereshagin wrote:
> Hello.
>
> 2013/01/16 13:19:19 -0600 "Joseph A. Nagy, Jr" => To
> Peter Vereshagin :
> JANJ> On 01/16/13 12:58, Peter Vereshagin wrote:
> JANJ> > Hello.
> JANJ> >
> JANJ> > By far the 'portsnap' has a lag from svn. I think firefox-18.0,1
> update wa
Hello.
2013/01/16 13:19:19 -0600 "Joseph A. Nagy, Jr" => To
Peter Vereshagin :
JANJ> On 01/16/13 12:58, Peter Vereshagin wrote:
JANJ> > Hello.
JANJ> >
JANJ> > By far the 'portsnap' has a lag from svn. I think firefox-18.0,1 update
was
JANJ> > late at 4 days at the least, for instance.
JANJ> >
On 01/16/13 12:58, Peter Vereshagin wrote:
> Hello.
>
> By far the 'portsnap' has a lag from svn. I think firefox-18.0,1 update was
> late at 4 days at the least, for instance.
>
> Thus I'd like to move to svn for base and ports.
Have you read the handbook?
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO
Hello.
By far the 'portsnap' has a lag from svn. I think firefox-18.0,1 update was
late at 4 days at the least, for instance.
Thus I'd like to move to svn for base and ports.
The only problem for me personally with svn is: its multiple '.svn'
directoriees all over the repo.
This is what I get c
On Jan 16, 2013 10:24 AM, "Robert Huff" wrote:
>
>
>Situation:
>I have a hard drive which may or may not have died already,
> from which I would _very_ much like to recover maybe 1 gbyte of data.
>After extracting it from the old machine, it's now hooked up to
> a system ru
> Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2013 10:14:19 -0800
> From: "Thomas D. Dean"
> Subject: Re: time_t definition
>
> On 01/16/13 03:00, Patrick Lamaiziere wrote:
>
> > Looks like gcc47 checks the printf format string (-Wformat)
> > Disable this check or convert your time_t.
>
> Yes, I know gcc47 checks the form
Situation:
I have a hard drive which may or may not have died already,
from which I would _very_ much like to recover maybe 1 gbyte of data.
After extracting it from the old machine, it's now hooked up to
a system running:
FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #0: Sun Dec 30 12:52:09 EST 2012
Top posting for brevity - the fact is, the code in your original
example is wrong. There are reasons to complain about argument size
mismatches, esp. in print functions that call (versions of) malloc.
You should cast the time_t value explicitly, or use %d instead of %ld.
- M
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013
On 01/16/13 03:00, Patrick Lamaiziere wrote:
Looks like gcc47 checks the printf format string (-Wformat)
Disable this check or convert your time_t.
Yes, I know gcc47 checks the format string.
But, time_t is of type int32, from a typedef statement.
#include
typedef int zzz;
typedef zzz yyy;
2013-01-16 12:14, Bas Smeelen skrev:
On 01/16/2013 12:08 PM, Leslie Jensen wrote:
I'm using vnc-4.1.3_5 on FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE with xfce4.
I have about 10 different hosts that I usually connect to.
I would like these hosts to be in a drop down menu so I just have to
pick the one I need to c
On 01/16/2013 12:08 PM, Leslie Jensen wrote:
I'm using vnc-4.1.3_5 on FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE with xfce4.
I have about 10 different hosts that I usually connect to.
I would like these hosts to be in a drop down menu so I just have to pick
the one I need to connect to.
From what I can read on-li
I'm using vnc-4.1.3_5 on FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE with xfce4.
I have about 10 different hosts that I usually connect to.
I would like these hosts to be in a drop down menu so I just have to
pick the one I need to connect to.
From what I can read on-line the hosts should be saved to
$HOME/.vnc/rec
Le Tue, 15 Jan 2013 10:35:53 -0800,
"Thomas D. Dean" a écrit :
Hello,
> I am attempting to recompile some code from an older version.
>
> > uname -a
> FreeBSD ZD7000 9.1-STABLE FreeBSD 9.1-STABLE #1: Sun Jan 13 23:44:33
> PST 2013 root@ZD7000:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386
>
> > make
32 matches
Mail list logo
