On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 05:44:28PM -0500, Jason Massey wrote:
> Dear FreeBSD masters:
>
> I am looking to understand the toolchain that begins with an mdoc-based
> manual page and ends with a nice HTML file (as illustrated by
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=groff_mdoc&apropos=0&sektion=
For those on the questions list who would find this interesting.
Original Message
Subject: [HEADSUP][CFT] pkgng beta1 is out
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 13:39:30 +0100
From: Baptiste Daroussin
To: curr...@freebsd.org, po...@freebsd.org, ports-annou...@freebsd.org
Hi,
pkgng has jus
On 1/30/2012 6:13 PM, freebsd-lists-e...@erikosterholm.org wrote:
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 03:28:28PM -0700, Chad Perrin wrote:
You talk a lot about how easy it is to maintain a binary package system.
I would like you to convince me that it is easy, keeping in mind that it
should remain compatibl
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 18:40:50 -0500, David Jackson wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 5:49 PM, Polytropon wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 17:04:56 -0500, David Jackson wrote:
> > > I wish to use binary packages and I specifically do not want to compile
> > > anything, it tends to take far too long
I'd try routed_enable = "YES" instead.
Regards
Éric Masson
I have now setup a virtual instance of FreeBSD and another machine
running Bind9 on OpenBSD.
I can tell that the system is receiving RIP updates as netstat -r shows
the routes advertised by my router however, it seems that RIP
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 03:28:28PM -0700, Chad Perrin wrote:
> You talk a lot about how easy it is to maintain a binary package system.
> I would like you to convince me that it is easy, keeping in mind that it
> should remain compatible with the ports system. I am willing to be
> convinced.
>
>
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 11:49:46PM +0100, Polytropon wrote:
> > Binary
> > packages are a big time saver and are more efficient.
>
> More efficient? Depends. In regards of installation, they're
> often faster. In regards of spped during operation... well,
> depends. :-)
>
> The binary packages ar
On 2012.01.30 18:40, David Jackson wrote:
Perhaps that is because the people who want to use packages have given up
on FreeBSD.
WTF?!? hint: I'm standing right beside you as you're saying this.
Steve
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
ht
On 30/01/2012 22:04, David Jackson wrote:
> Binary packages are a big time saver and are more efficient.
Yes, definitely -- this is true for many use cases. Not all by any
means, but enough that binary packages are a must-have.
> It should be easy for FreeBSD to make it easy to install the most
On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 00:02:44 +0100
Bas Smeelen wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 17:04:56 -0500
> David Jackson wrote:
To put it bluntly
It's the users fault
from my own experience
Apple: just fsck off
Mcrsft and Oracle and whom they have swallowed so far: just pay enough
bucks, it's still your fa
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 12:52:07 -0500
David Jackson wrote:
> I have tried endlessly to no avail to upgrade binary the packages on
> Freebsd to the latest version. I have tried:
>
> *portupgrade -PP -a
> *portmaster -PP -a
> *pkg_update
>
> All fail miserably and totally and have left the system in
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 5:49 PM, Polytropon wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 17:04:56 -0500, David Jackson wrote:
> > I wish to use binary packages and I specifically do not want to compile
> > anything, it tends to take far too long to compile programs and would
> > rather install some packages and
Dear FreeBSD masters:
I am looking to understand the toolchain that begins with an mdoc-based
manual page and ends with a nice HTML file (as illustrated by
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=groff_mdoc&apropos=0&sektion=0&manpath=FreeBSD+9.0-RELEASE&arch=default&format=html
).
Hypothetical
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 17:04:56 -0500
David Jackson wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 3:58 PM, Bas Smeelen wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 12:52:07 -0500
> > David Jackson wrote:
> >
> > > I have tried endlessly to no avail to upgrade binary the packages
> > > on Freebsd to the latest versio
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 17:04:56 -0500
David Jackson wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 3:58 PM, Bas Smeelen wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 12:52:07 -0500
> > David Jackson wrote:
> >
> > > I have tried endlessly to no avail to upgrade binary the packages
> > > on Freebsd to the latest version. I
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 17:04:56 -0500, David Jackson wrote:
> I wish to use binary packages and I specifically do not want to compile
> anything, it tends to take far too long to compile programs and would
> rather install some packages and have it all work right away.
That's often true, especially w
You talk a lot about how easy it is to maintain a binary package system.
I would like you to convince me that it is easy, keeping in mind that it
should remain compatible with the ports system. I am willing to be
convinced.
--
Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 14:24:08 +0100
Lubomir Matousek wrote:
I changed apache default user from www to wbserv.
I changed also file ownership from www to wbserv.
Is there any way for portupgrade, that the ownership of installed
port files remains the same? It means wbserv?
On 30.1.2012 15:08
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 3:58 PM, Bas Smeelen wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 12:52:07 -0500
> David Jackson wrote:
>
> > I have tried endlessly to no avail to upgrade binary the packages on
> > Freebsd to the latest version. I have tried:
> >
> > *portupgrade -PP -a
> > *portmaster -PP -a
> > *pkg_
On 1/30/2012 at 7:26 PM Chris Whitehouse wrote:
|http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=136327
|
|includes a workaround, hopefully it will work for you:
|
|disable firewire (IEEE 1394) in BIOS.
|rebuild kernel with device sbp disabled and install it.
|reboot
|if it works re-enable firewire in
Le 30 janv. 2012 à 17:15, bsd a écrit :
> Le 30 janv. 2012 à 16:59, Matthew Seaman a écrit :
>
>> On 30/01/2012 15:40, bsd wrote:
>>> I am still not able to get the log correctly sent to the specified jail… ??
>>
>> Are you running syslogd in the host environment?
>
> Yes I am running it both
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 12:52:07 -0500
David Jackson wrote:
> I have tried endlessly to no avail to upgrade binary the packages on
> Freebsd to the latest version. I have tried:
>
> *portupgrade -PP -a
> *portmaster -PP -a
> *pkg_update
>
> All fail miserably and totally and have left the system in
In the Linux NFS server it's permissible to share a directory with
whitespace in the directory name by wrapping the first field in the exports
list with double-quotes. This does not seem to be true with the FreeBSD NFS
server. Is there a way to share a directory with spaces in the name?
Thanks in
On 01/30/2012 07:11 PM, Eric Masson wrote:
Eric Masson writes:
Sorry, Followup to myself.
I'd try routed_enable = "YES" instead.
router_enable = "YES" as Michael stated in another post.
Regards
Éric Masson
The generic syntax of rc.conf is like so (using mine as example):
zfs_enable="YE
On 1/30/12 2:24 PM, Lubomir Matousek wrote:
I changed apache default user from www to wbserv.
I changed also file ownership from www to wbserv.
Is there any way for portupgrade, that the ownership of installed port
files remains the same? It means wbserv?
On 30.1.2012 14:52, Damien
On 30/01/2012 17:41, Mike. wrote:
I installed 9.0 on my test ThinkPad. During the boot-up process, I see
the following message after a pause in the boot-up process:
run_interrupt_driven_hooks: still waiting after 60 seconds for
xpt_config
A quick spin through google showed the message occurre
On 01/30/2012 06:53 PM, Eric Masson wrote:
Kaya Saman writes:
Hi,
does anyone know if there's an implementation of the RIP version 2
routing protocol in FreeBSD???
man 8 routed
I did check out the handbook for the enable_routerd="YES"
I'd try routed_enable = "YES" instead.
Regards
Éric
On 01/30/2012 06:47 PM, Michael Sierchio wrote:
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 10:33 AM, Kaya Saman wrote:
Hi there,
does anyone know if there's an implementation of the RIP version 2 routing
protocol in FreeBSD???
man routed
The routed utility is a daemon invoked at boot time to manage the n
Eric Masson writes:
Sorry, Followup to myself.
> I'd try routed_enable = "YES" instead.
router_enable = "YES" as Michael stated in another post.
Regards
Éric Masson
--
> et me dis quil y a eu une merde avec le serveur truc machin et que ca a
> fait un gros server crash. OU ets la merde???
Rick Miller writes:
> Thanks Rob...
>
> I put the kernel conf file in the source tree as opposed to linking to
> it and it certainly did compile the custom kernel.
>
> What confuses me (not that I expect you to have the answer) is that
> Chapter 9 of the handbook has a tip that recommends keeping
Kaya Saman writes:
Hi,
> does anyone know if there's an implementation of the RIP version 2
> routing protocol in FreeBSD???
man 8 routed
> I did check out the handbook for the enable_routerd="YES"
I'd try routed_enable = "YES" instead.
Regards
Éric Masson
--
je crosspost sur fr rec moto
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 10:33 AM, Kaya Saman wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> does anyone know if there's an implementation of the RIP version 2 routing
> protocol in FreeBSD???
man routed
The routed utility is a daemon invoked at boot time to manage the network
routing tables. It uses Routing
Thanks Rob...
I put the kernel conf file in the source tree as opposed to linking to
it and it certainly did compile the custom kernel.
What confuses me (not that I expect you to have the answer) is that
Chapter 9 of the handbook has a tip that recommends keeping the kernel
config in /root/kernel
Hi there,
does anyone know if there's an implementation of the RIP version 2
routing protocol in FreeBSD???
I would like to use it to exchange routes with my Cisco 857W router as
the BSD machine will provide routing for a virtual test network in VBox.
I did check out the handbook for the
I installed 9.0 on my test ThinkPad. During the boot-up process, I see
the following message after a pause in the boot-up process:
run_interrupt_driven_hooks: still waiting after 60 seconds for
xpt_config
A quick spin through google showed the message occurred in older
versions of FreeBSD, thou
I have tried endlessly to no avail to upgrade binary the packages on
Freebsd to the latest version. I have tried:
*portupgrade -PP -a
*portmaster -PP -a
*pkg_update
All fail miserably and totally and have left the system in an unuseable
state.
Why can't FreeBSD just make the package system "just
Hello,
I'm having a problem on a server of mine that is acting as a bridge,
that whenever I download from the server itself it's very slow. From
machines going through it's bridge there are no problems.
When looking for what could be the cause, I had a look at my routing
table and saw the followi
Le 30 janv. 2012 à 16:59, Matthew Seaman a écrit :
> On 30/01/2012 15:40, bsd wrote:
>> I am still not able to get the log correctly sent to the specified jail… ??
>
> Are you running syslogd in the host environment?
Yes I am running it both in the host and jail environment.
> If so, it's pr
On 30/01/2012 15:40, bsd wrote:
> I am still not able to get the log correctly sent to the specified jail… ??
Are you running syslogd in the host environment? If so, it's probably
bound to INADDR_ANY and thus pre-empted your jailed syslog from binding
to a network port.
Try adding
syslogd_flag
Hello,
I would like to setup a syslog server inside a jail
I have setup couple of other jail and they are already working as a DNS server
and a HTTP server.
The next step would be to configure a new jail as a syslog server.
I have the following parameters :
jail_enable="YES"
jail_mount_en
On 30/01/2012 14:43, hvn wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 14:25:42 +, Matthew Seaman wrote:
>
>> On 30/01/2012 13:57, hvn wrote:
>>> Using v.FreeBSD 8.2, I'm trying to install Firefox 9 by pkg_add -r
>>> firefox. According to the docs, this should work. However, instead of
>>> v9 it tries to insta
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 6:19 PM, Pierre-Luc Drouin wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 11:44 AM, Pierre-Luc Drouin > wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 10:41 AM, Pierre-Luc Drouin <
>> pldro...@pldrouin.net> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 9:58 AM, Pierre-Luc Drouin <
>>> pl
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 8:26 PM, Joshua Isom wrote:
> It should be 9.0-release. I suspect a problem with pkg_upgrade any not
> FreeBSD.
>
> Install misc/compat8x and you won't need to upgrade all the ports at once,
> they'll still work.
>
>
Yes But I want to be able to upgrade the binary package
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 14:25:42 +, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> On 30/01/2012 13:57, hvn wrote:
>> Using v.FreeBSD 8.2, I'm trying to install Firefox 9 by pkg_add -r
>> firefox. According to the docs, this should work. However, instead of
>> v9 it tries to install v 3.6 which goes wrong because of dep
On 30/01/2012 13:57, hvn wrote:
> Using v.FreeBSD 8.2, I'm trying to install Firefox 9 by pkg_add -r
> firefox. According to the docs, this should work. However, instead of v9
> it tries to install v 3.6 which goes wrong because of dependency
> conflicts. Any idea on how to solve this or what go
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 14:24:08 +0100
Lubomir Matousek wrote:
> I changed apache default user from www to wbserv.
>
> I changed also file ownership from www to wbserv.
>
>
> Is there any way for portupgrade, that the ownership of installed
> port files remains the same? It means wbserv?
>
If you
Hi,
Using v.FreeBSD 8.2, I'm trying to install Firefox 9 by pkg_add -r
firefox. According to the docs, this should work. However, instead of v9
it tries to install v 3.6 which goes wrong because of dependency
conflicts. Any idea on how to solve this or what goes wrong?
Thanks
On 1/30/12 2:24 PM, Lubomir Matousek wrote:
> I changed apache default user from www to wbserv.
>
> I changed also file ownership from www to wbserv.
>
>
> Is there any way for portupgrade, that the ownership of installed port
> files remains the same? It means wbserv?
>
You'll want to be mor
I changed apache default user from www to wbserv.
I changed also file ownership from www to wbserv.
Is there any way for portupgrade, that the ownership of installed port
files remains the same? It means wbserv?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mai
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 13:17:16 +0100 (CET)
Marco Beishuizen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> When booting my computer today I noticed the message at the end:
> starting background filesystem check in 60 seconds. This seems
> strange to me since SU+J is enabled on all filesystems. How is this
> possible? NB running
hello,
first i very thanks for you because read my mail...
i install squid 2.7 on FreeBSD 8.2 (width GENERIC kernel + PF + Bridge) and
mark hit object with squid zph_mode , like this:
zph_mode tos
zph_local 0x30
zph_parent 0x0
zph_option 136
but when i run : tcpdump -nvi em1 port 80
Hi,
When booting my computer today I noticed the message at the end: starting
background filesystem check in 60 seconds. This seems strange to me since
SU+J is enabled on all filesystems. How is this possible? NB running
FreeBSD 9-STABLE
Regards,
Marco
--
In most instances, all an argument
p
On 1/30/12 11:40 AM, Darrell Betts wrote:
> Installed Freebsd9.0 along with Apache2.2 ,php5, php5-extensions, perl, and
> phpmyadmin
>
> phpmyadmin works fine when i put in the url but if I add a virtual host file
> then I get the error can't find phpmyadmin on the server.
>
> What am I missing
Installed Freebsd9.0 along with Apache2.2 ,php5, php5-extensions, perl, and
phpmyadmin
phpmyadmin works fine when i put in the url but if I add a virtual host file
then I get the error can't find phpmyadmin on the server.
What am I missing here?
Thanks__
54 matches
Mail list logo
