*Hi,
I want to configure CVS in eclipse so can you please help me in this
configuration?
*
--
Thanks & Regards,**
*N V R Gupta Nallajalla
**P **Please do not print this e-mail unless you really need to. This will
preserve trees on our planet.*
___
f
I agree if you move drives and a particular zfs has not seen them before - and
there is a zfs label at the end things can go pear shaped - however…
if you blast just the end of the drive it should be fine.
RB
Ps. Maybe I;ll title a book fun with zfs and glabel or cheap thrills with zfs,
glabe
> I've got a weird problem... I was working on installing 9.0 w/zfs on my
> laptop, messed up, rebooted, *formatted the drives* and restarted. Got
> much further the next time, however...
>
> There is a zombie copy of the old zpool sitting around interfering with
> things. 'zpool import' lis
update
>
> Terminated
> ===>>> The following actions were performed:
> Re-installation of poppler-glib-0.18.0
>
>
> ===>>> You can restart from the point of failure with this command line:
> portmaster x11-wm/xfce4-wm
>
>
> Any id
Dear folks,
Running FreeBSD-8.2 amd64 on three machines, on all three the poppler
message appears everytime I issue
# portmaster -a
command to update ports. Message says
===>>> The following actions were performed:
Re-installation of poppler-glib-0.18.0
It has done this for quite a whil
Dear folks,
I am trying to update all ports and have encountered xfce4-wm failing
to compile. I used
# portmaster -a -x xfce4-wm
to bypass the failure.
===>>> Launching child to install x11-wm/xfce4-wm
===>>> Port directory: /usr/ports/x11-wm/xfce4-wm
===>>> Starting check for build dependenci
Matt Mullins wrote:
>> The link-local addresses don't really harm, but I found them confusing,
>> as the host is running as a router, and rtadv announces the link-local
>> address by default.
>
> IPv6-standards-wise, this is the correct thing to do. Router
> advertisements should contain link-lo
Hi,
is anyone running a Common Lisp port on FreeBSD/sparc64?
I'm asking because none of our Common Lisp ports lang/clisp,
lang/ccl, lang/cmucl, lang/sbcl compile on sparc64.
On Debian Linux 6.0.1a for SPARC, at least sbcl is available.
Maybe clisp as well, IIRC.
Any suggestions for running Commo
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 03:30:29PM -0700, Dale Scott wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: Yuri Pankov
> Date: Monday, January 16, 2012 13:49
>
> > Just use `man /full/path/to/the/manpage`. Also check man(1) and
> > man.conf(5) on how to specify additional MANPATHs.
>
> Thanks Yuri! As p
- Original Message -
From: Yuri Pankov
Date: Monday, January 16, 2012 13:49
> Just use `man /full/path/to/the/manpage`. Also check man(1) and
> man.conf(5) on how to specify additional MANPATHs.
Thanks Yuri! As per man.conf(5), I created /usr/local/etc/rc.d/mdbtools.conf to
add /usr/loc
Dear folks,
I had a FreeBSD 9.0 BETA 2 Machine I was happily running since the
release and only updated ports via portmaster -a, and now since Fedora
9 has officially been released, I ran make buildworld, make
buildkernel, make installkernel and mergemaster -i, and make
installworld and now X does
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 01:27:31PM -0700, Dale Scott wrote:
> I installed mdbtools from source on github and it put its man pages in
> "/usr/local/share/man/man1", where the default man command doesn't find
> them (although "man -M /usr/local/share/man mdb-export" works).
Just use `man /full/path/
I installed mdbtools from source on github and it put its man pages in
"/usr/local/share/man/man1", where the default man command doesn't find them
(although "man -M /usr/local/share/man mdb-export" works).
>From "man hier", it looks like the man pages should have been put into
>"/usr/local/man
Approximate 'zpool status' on 8.2:
NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM
data.zfs DEGRADED 0 0 0
mirror-0DEGRADED 0 0 0
gpt/mid.zfs.sg1tb ONLINE 0 0 0
gpt/sam1tbONLINE 0 0
On 16/01/2012 09:55, Matthias Apitz wrote:
El día Monday, January 16, 2012 a las 09:45:23AM +0100, Bernard Higonnet
escribió:
I am trying to install 9.0 on a small notebook on which I have
previously successfully installed 8.2.
I don't get very far. When defining partitions I have opted for G
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 7:27 AM, Freek Dijkstra wrote:
> The link-local addresses don't really harm, but I found them confusing,
> as the host is running as a router, and rtadv announces the link-local
> address by default.
IPv6-standards-wise, this is the correct thing to do. Router
advertiseme
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 8:37 AM, Daniel Staal wrote:
> There is a zombie copy of the old zpool sitting around interfering with
> things. 'zpool import' lists it, but it can't import it because the disks
> don't actually exist. 'zpool destroy' can't delete it, because it's not
> imported. ('No s
most likely a ifs "label" on the disk from before that you need to get rid of
before doing the install.
RB
On Jan 16, 2012, at 11:37 AM, Daniel Staal wrote:
>
> I've got a weird problem... I was working on installing 9.0 w/zfs on my
> laptop, messed up, rebooted, *formatted the drives* and r
I've got a weird problem... I was working on installing 9.0 w/zfs on my
laptop, messed up, rebooted, *formatted the drives* and restarted. Got
much further the next time, however...
There is a zombie copy of the old zpool sitting around interfering with
things. 'zpool import' lists it, bu
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 7:03 AM, Daniel Lewis
wrote:
> Hey I install apache on free bsd 8.2 but accidentially didnt include
> the perl threads. Now when I try to re-install it says perl file
> required for apache..How do i fix this problem?
>
I am assuming you want to run mod_perl on mod_work
Op 16-1-2012 13:17, Magnus Strahlert schreef:
On 15 January 2012 14:23, Dick Hoogendijk wrote:
Does anybody already did a *binary* update (w/ freebsd-update) from a zfs on
root freebsd-8.2-RELEASE to a new freebsd-9.0-RELEASE zfs on root system?
Did all went well? I know the procedure (freebsd-
On 1/16/12 1:03 PM, Daniel Lewis wrote:
> Hey I install apache on free bsd 8.2 but accidentially didnt include
> the perl threads. Now when I try to re-install it says perl file
> required for apache..How do i fix this problem?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
> Daniel Lewis
> 561-676-1073
Hi,
Sadly, "p
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 12:21:27 +, RW wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 12:59:59 +0100
> Polytropon wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 05:32:11 -0600, ajtiM wrote:
> > > On Sunday 15 January 2012 23:54:52 Chip Camden wrote:
> > > > Quoth Polytropon on Monday, 16 January 2012:
> > > > > On Sun, 15 Jan 20
On 15 January 2012 14:23, Dick Hoogendijk wrote:
> Does anybody already did a *binary* update (w/ freebsd-update) from a zfs on
> root freebsd-8.2-RELEASE to a new freebsd-9.0-RELEASE zfs on root system?
> Did all went well? I know the procedure (freebsd-update, recompile all
> ports, finish freeb
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 12:59:59 +0100
Polytropon wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 05:32:11 -0600, ajtiM wrote:
> > On Sunday 15 January 2012 23:54:52 Chip Camden wrote:
> > > Quoth Polytropon on Monday, 16 January 2012:
> > > > On Sun, 15 Jan 2012 15:40:20 -0800, Jim Pazarena wrote:
> > > > > Is it permi
Hey I install apache on free bsd 8.2 but accidentially didnt include
the perl threads. Now when I try to re-install it says perl file
required for apache..How do i fix this problem?
Thanks,
Daniel Lewis
561-676-1073
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.or
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 05:32:11 -0600, ajtiM wrote:
> On Sunday 15 January 2012 23:54:52 Chip Camden wrote:
> > Quoth Polytropon on Monday, 16 January 2012:
> > > On Sun, 15 Jan 2012 15:40:20 -0800, Jim Pazarena wrote:
> > > > Is it permissible to delete the dot snap folder which is created
> > > > in
On Sunday 15 January 2012 23:54:52 Chip Camden wrote:
> Quoth Polytropon on Monday, 16 January 2012:
> > On Sun, 15 Jan 2012 15:40:20 -0800, Jim Pazarena wrote:
> > > Is it permissible to delete the dot snap folder which is created
> > > in a filesystem?
> >
> > First of all, it's called a directo
2012-01-14 10:34, Polytropon skrev:
On Sat, 14 Jan 2012 10:12:48 +0100, Bernt Hansson wrote:
2012-01-14 09:22, Polytropon skrev:
How many subdirectories are there?
ls | wc -l
32765
Seems that you have reached LINK_MAX of 32767
(according to /usr/src/sys/sys/syslimits.h).
The differen
El día Monday, January 16, 2012 a las 09:45:23AM +0100, Bernard Higonnet
escribió:
> I am trying to install 9.0 on a small notebook on which I have
> previously successfully installed 8.2.
>
> I don't get very far. When defining partitions I have opted for Guided
> and chosen a drive with enou
I am trying to install 9.0 on a small notebook on which I have
previously successfully installed 8.2.
I don't get very far. When defining partitions I have opted for Guided
and chosen a drive with enough space (3.5GB), Entire disk. I am then
asked if I'm sure I want to proceed, to which I answ
31 matches
Mail list logo
