Hello,
Is there some way to start firefox3 in a defined geometry, something
like
$ firefox3 -geometry 1024x768
The desktop in question is KDE3, if this does matter, but I don't think
so; thanks
the background of this is: I have to prepare some HTML based presentation
(in S5, http://meyerweb.c
On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 07:15:21PM +0100, Patrick Lamaiziere wrote:
> Le Sun, 8 Jan 2012 19:58:18 -0500,
>
> Hello,
>
>
> I've just tried without problem. Well, have you the port
> textproc/docproj installed (of course)?
The equivalent, AIUI: docproj-nojadetex.
> Be sure that the source are up
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 5:00 PM, alexus wrote:
> Thank you so much for this wonderful feedback!
>
> One of the things I'm seeing is that unfortunately packages are
> somewhat limited vs ports...
>
> For example:
>
> I'm trying to get Apache httpd + PHP to work, after pkg_add -r php5,
> php5 doesn't
All,
I am having an issue with getting buildworld to work for me. It is failing
while building zfs -
cc -DADARA_OS
-I/data/pmahan/devel/pm_ipr9.0/ipr9.0/src/cddl/sbin/zfs/../../../cddl/contrib/opensolaris/lib/libzpool/common
-I/data/pmahan/devel/pm_ipr9.0/ipr9.0/src/cddl/sbin/zfs/../../../cd
On 01/08/12 09:05, leeoliveshackelf...@surewest.net wrote:
Greetings, dear FreeBSD enthusiast. I am tearing my hair out trying to get
FreeBSD 8.2 operating on my Hewlett-Packard xw4400 workstation. I am a
newcomer to FreeBSD. This workstation is used by several different people.
Normally,
Thank you so much for this wonderful feedback!
One of the things I'm seeing is that unfortunately packages are
somewhat limited vs ports...
For example:
I'm trying to get Apache httpd + PHP to work, after pkg_add -r php5,
php5 doesn't have libphp5.so that links Apache and PHP together... so
unle
On 1/9/2012 10:20 PM, Christoph Egger wrote:
Hi all!
I'm having a FreeBSD 8 gateway that is supposed to do NAT/firewall
stuff with internet coming through 2 distinct DSL modems from the same
carrier. Unfortunately I can only run ppp on one of these lines as the
endpoint address for both lines
Update.
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-
> questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Devin Teske
> Sent: Monday, January 09, 2012 12:05 PM
> To: FreeBSD Questions
> Subject: Broken amd64 packages: cvsup-without-gui and sup
>
> Hi all,
>
>
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 3:37 PM, David Jackson wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 9:46 AM, Alejandro Imass wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 1:41 AM, Da Rock
>> wrote:
>> > On 01/03/12 12:06, Walter Alejandro Iglesias wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, Jan 02, 2012 at 12:33:20PM -0700, Chad Perrin wro
> And that's just the way it is now. Try replicating the wealth of
> information you get in various config files in FreeBSD in a GUI. Just
> how hard it is to open a simple text file in an editor and just fracking
> do what it tells you to in comments?! And it's not just the base
> system, any d
Am 09.01.2012, 21:47 Uhr, schrieb Michael Ross :
Am 09.01.2012, 21:20 Uhr, schrieb Christoph Egger
:
Hi all!
I'm having a FreeBSD 8 gateway that is supposed to do NAT/firewall
stuff with internet coming through 2 distinct DSL modems from the same
carrier. Unfortunately I can only run ppp
Am 09.01.2012, 21:20 Uhr, schrieb Christoph Egger
:
Hi all!
I'm having a FreeBSD 8 gateway that is supposed to do NAT/firewall
stuff with internet coming through 2 distinct DSL modems from the same
carrier. Unfortunately I can only run ppp on one of these lines as the
endpoint address for b
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 9:46 AM, Alejandro Imass wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 1:41 AM, Da Rock
> wrote:
> > On 01/03/12 12:06, Walter Alejandro Iglesias wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, Jan 02, 2012 at 12:33:20PM -0700, Chad Perrin wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Ubuntu, actually, has thrown out the baby with the
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 13:50, Joseph Mingrone wrote:
> From within emacs, if I invoke a new multi-term buffer with C-c c, the
> TERM environment variable is set to eterm-color and a TERMCAP variable
> is also set and
> everything works fine. However, if I ssh to a remote host from within
> this b
Hi all!
I'm having a FreeBSD 8 gateway that is supposed to do NAT/firewall
stuff with internet coming through 2 distinct DSL modems from the same
carrier. Unfortunately I can only run ppp on one of these lines as the
endpoint address for both lines are the same so bringing up the second
line fai
On Jan 9, 2012, at 12:02 PM, alexus wrote:
> there is no way to make it like that? so it has to be build via ports?
The PHP maintainer decides the default options, which is what the precompiled
package you got used. While many people want PHP in the form of an Apache
module, other folks use it
Hi all,
Running FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE-p6 here, we've noticed that both the amd64 build of
"supfilesrv" as installed by the "sup-2.0.20060802" package AND the amd64 build
of "cvsupd" as installed by the "cvsup-without-gui-16.1h_4" package, both
segmentation fault immediately upon connection.
The eas
there is no way to make it like that? so it has to be build via ports?
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 3:02 PM, Peter wrote:
>> I created a jail and within a jail I did
>>
>> pkg_add -r apache22
>> pkg_add -r php5
>>
>> now I have apache and php, but whenever I'm trying to hit phpinfo.php,
>> I see source
> I created a jail and within a jail I did
>
> pkg_add -r apache22
> pkg_add -r php5
>
> now I have apache and php, but whenever I'm trying to hit phpinfo.php,
> I see source code... I dont think php5 added inside of apache22
>
> --
> http://alexus.org/
I don't think the package has the apache mod
I created a jail and within a jail I did
pkg_add -r apache22
pkg_add -r php5
now I have apache and php, but whenever I'm trying to hit phpinfo.php,
I see source code... I dont think php5 added inside of apache22
--
http://alexus.org/
___
freebsd-quest
> -Original Message-
> From: aim...@yabarana.com [mailto:aim...@yabarana.com] On Behalf Of
> Alejandro Imass
> Sent: Monday, January 09, 2012 11:37 AM
> To: Devin Teske
> Cc: alexus; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: ports vs packages
>
> On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 1:19 PM, Devin
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 1:19 PM, Devin Teske wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-
[...]
> Of course, this is explicit to rather serious production environments.
> Desktop and casual usage ... ports may serve you better if you li
On 1/9/12 6:48 PM, claudiu vasadi wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 6:17 PM, alexus wrote:
>
>> Ports vs Packages?
>>
>> /usr/ports vs pkg_*
>>
>> pros/cons
>>
>> --
>> http://alexus.org/
>> ___
>> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
>> http://li
On Jan 8, 2012, at 11:57 AM, Chris wrote:
> Can the upcoming FreeBSD 9 mount ext4 file systems out of the box?
Probably no. There's ext2 backwards-compatibility, but from what I recall, as
soon as someone uses extents under the ext4 filesystem it is no longer
backwards-compatible with ext2/3.
On Mon, 9 Jan 2012, Polytropon wrote:
On Mon, 9 Jan 2012 12:17:37 -0500, alexus wrote:
Ports vs Packages?
/usr/ports vs pkg_*
pros/cons
In short:
ports:
pro:
most current, if properly updated
build from source (security!)
apply optimi
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 6:17 PM, alexus wrote:
> Ports vs Packages?
>
> /usr/ports vs pkg_*
>
> pros/cons
>
> --
> http://alexus.org/
> ___
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To un
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-
> questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of alexus
> Sent: Monday, January 09, 2012 9:18 AM
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: ports vs packages
>
> Ports vs Packages?
>
> /usr/ports vs pkg_*
>
Hi,
Packages [1] for wine-fbsd64-1.3.36 have been uploaded to mediafire [2].
There are many reports that wine does not work with a clang compiled world
(help in fixing this problem is appreciated as it affects quite a few users).
The patch [3] for nVidia users is now included in the package
On Mon, January 9, 2012 12:17 pm, alexus wrote:
> Ports vs Packages?
>
> /usr/ports vs pkg_*
>
> pros/cons
Ports:
Compiled to *your* specs, for *your* machine.
Faster/smaller downloads.
More options available for customization.
Can apply your own patches.
Packages:
Faster installs.
Known configu
Le Sun, 8 Jan 2012 19:58:18 -0500,
Joe Altman a écrit :
> Greetings...
Hello,
> I've some sort of image error in building the docs from source. I've
> copied it below, and wonder how it might be fixed? Sometimes, the
> issue causes many runs of make in the directory
> /usr/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1 b
On Mon, 9 Jan 2012 13:06:27 -0500, Alejandro Imass wrote:
> Use pre-built binary packages to install very large
> stuff like Gnome, Open Office, etc.
Not an option if your required language settings or
the inclusion or exclusion of desktop bindings (KDE,
Gnome, CUPS) don't match the default option
On Mon, 9 Jan 2012 12:17:37 -0500, alexus wrote:
> Ports vs Packages?
>
> /usr/ports vs pkg_*
>
> pros/cons
In short:
ports:
pro:
most current, if properly updated
build from source (security!)
apply optimization (speed!)
a
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 12:17 PM, alexus wrote:
> Ports vs Packages?
>
> /usr/ports vs pkg_*
>
> pros/cons
The beauty of FBSD: they ultimately update the same DB, heck even Perl
modules installed via the FBSD CPAN shell get updated to that same db.
My rule of thumb: use ports for everything, compi
Ports vs Packages?
/usr/ports vs pkg_*
pros/cons
--
http://alexus.org/
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.o
Здравствуйте, Robert.
Вы писали 26 декабря 2011 г., 23:54:59:
RB> [drivelectomy -- 200+ lines]
RB> You've been told the following, *repeatedly*:
RB> Your hardware is not capable of keeping up with the level of network traffic
RB> it is being subjected to.
RB> Reaaltek cards and the 're' devic
Perplexed by an issue connecting a Windows 7 client to an old FreeBSD 5.3
server. On Windows XP clients SecureCRT gets "The semaphore timeout period
has expired". PuTTY gets "Network error: Software caused connection abort".
I have no issues connecting to newer 6.x, 7.x, 8.x, 9.x BSD servers thoug
Can you obtain partitioning information via bsdlabel (disklabel) for the s4
slice to check if FreeBSD can identify the other partitions properly.
Sorta:
$ sudo bsdlabel da0s4
# /dev/da0s4:
16 partitions:
#size offsetfstype [fsize bsize bps/cpg]
a: 146801907
Hi
Since a while I notice on some 8.1-RELEASE machines that after a buildkernel
and installkernel, besides the old kernel being moved to /boot/kernel.old,
it also seems to get copied /boot/kernel.old1. I update most servers with
freebsd-update which also update the sources from which the new kerne
On 1/6/12 10:46 PM, Коньков Евгений wrote:
> Здравствуйте, Devin.
>
> Вы писали 6 января 2012 г., 23:42:54:
>
>
>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-
>>> questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of ??? ???
>>> Sent: Friday, Janua
On 9 January 2012 01:31, Matt Mullins wrote:
> Whoops, I missed this message before posting my reply a few minutes ago.
>
> On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 9:36 AM, Drew Tomlinson
> wrote:
> > Yes, although I've read that 'zfs set mountpoint=/ zroot' is acceptable
> as
> > well. I set mine to "/" after
Dnia poniedziałek, 9 stycznia 2012 08:36:33 n dhert pisze:
> /usr/ports/UPDATING
>
> 20120108 contains instructions
> # portmaster -o devel/p5-CPAN-Meta devel/p5-Version-Requirements
> # pkg_delete p5-Version-Requirements-\*
> I don't use portmaster.
> What are the equivalent instructions for
/usr/ports/UPDATING
20120108 contains instructions
# portmaster -o devel/p5-CPAN-Meta devel/p5-Version-Requirements
# pkg_delete p5-Version-Requirements-\*
I don't use portmaster.
What are the equivalent instructions for portupgrade ?
___
freebsd-que
42 matches
Mail list logo
