Peter Andreev wrote:
> >>
> >> > Victor, we researched this topic and learned that response time highly
> >> > depends on distance between user and resolver, while cache influence
> >> > on this value is lesser.
> >> > So I advice you to keep all as is.
> >>
> >> Be it so. Thank you.
> >
> > And th
2011/12/29 Victor Sudakov :
> Victor Sudakov wrote:
>>
>> > Victor, we researched this topic and learned that response time highly
>> > depends on distance between user and resolver, while cache influence
>> > on this value is lesser.
>> > So I advice you to keep all as is.
>>
>> Be it so. Thank yo
[N.B. Please reply directly or Cc: me in any replies. I read -questions
in the digest form, so there can be a delay of a day or more before I see
replies posted only to the list. Thanks.]
I was in the process of preparing to upgrade from 7.4 to 8.2 (at last!),
when I encountered a poss
On Thu, 29 Dec 2011 04:39:40 +0100
"Julian H. Stacey" wrote:
> Hi,
> "Conrad J. Sabatier" wrote:
> > On Wed, 28 Dec 2011 05:32:42 +0100
> > "Julian H. Stacey" wrote:
> >
> > > Damien Fleuriot wrote:
> > > > On 12/27/11 4:45 PM, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
> > > > > Hi questions@
> > > > [snip]
> >
Hi,
"Conrad J. Sabatier" wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Dec 2011 05:32:42 +0100
> "Julian H. Stacey" wrote:
>
> > Damien Fleuriot wrote:
> > > On 12/27/11 4:45 PM, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
> > > > Hi questions@
> > > [snip]
> > >
> > > > Externaly
> > > > {
> > > > man gnash says what to do
On Dec 28, 2011 9:26 PM, "Victor Sudakov" wrote:
> And the reason for the whole thread. One of the customers told me that
> 8.8.8.8 is faster than our own DNS servers which are located on the
> same 100 MBit/s LAN with them. I was shocked but it seems true, at
> least for the answers which are no
Victor Sudakov wrote:
>
> > Victor, we researched this topic and learned that response time highly
> > depends on distance between user and resolver, while cache influence
> > on this value is lesser.
> > So I advice you to keep all as is.
>
> Be it so. Thank you.
And the reason for the whole th
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-
> questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Gary Kline
> Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2011 3:50 PM
> To: FreeBSD Mailing List
> Subject: how to tell that a file exists and is not 0-len?
>
>
>
> guys,
>
>
On 28/12/2011 23:50, Gary Kline wrote:
> access(filenamewithpath, F_OK) returned true as Zero if i have
> access to it. what do i use in C to tell me that a file is not
> empty? fstat? or is there something more common?
stat(2) which uses the file path -- unless you have an open file
descri
guys,
access(filenamewithpath, F_OK) returned true as Zero if i have
access to it. what do i use in C to tell me that a file is not
empty? fstat? or is there something more common?
thanks,
gary
--
Gary Kline kl...@thought.org http://www.thought.org Public Service Unix
J
On Wed, 28 Dec 2011 05:32:42 +0100
"Julian H. Stacey" wrote:
> Damien Fleuriot wrote:
> > On 12/27/11 4:45 PM, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
> > > Hi questions@
> > [snip]
> >
> > > Externaly
> > > {
> > > man gnash says what to do from CLI,
> > > But I'm not clear what the URL is, of the flash
RB> [drivelectomy -- 200+ lines]
RB> You've been told the following, *repeatedly*:
RB> Your hardware is not capable of keeping up with the level of network traffic
RB> it is being subjected to.
RB> Reaaltek cards and the 're' device driver are a *BAD*CHOICE* for systems
with
RB> heavy network
Peter Andreev wrote:
[dd]
> Victor, we researched this topic and learned that response time highly
> depends on distance between user and resolver, while cache influence
> on this value is lesser.
> So I advice you to keep all as is.
Be it so. Thank you.
--
Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RI
Damien Fleuriot wrote:
>
>
> >>
> >> If you're trying to build up a cache to improve performance and response
> >> time, here's your scenario:
> >>
> >> DNS C, forward to DNS A,B for all queries
> >> DNS D, forward to DNS B,A for all queries
> >>
> >> Your cache will start building up and only re
Hello all,
I currently have a FreeBSD server colocated and it isn't always physically
accessible. I was trying to develop an upgrade path for my server, in
hopes to mainly save a trip to the colo center.
There are four disks, all in a single storage pool - tank.
Here is the naming convention I
Hi,
I have a dual port HBA:
isp0@pci0:2:0:0:class=0x0c0400 card=0x015d1077 chip=0x25321077
rev=0x02 hdr=0x00
vendor = 'QLogic Corporation'
device = '8Gb PCIe x8 Single/Dual Fibre Channel HBA (ISP2532)'
class = serial bus
subclass = Fibre Channel
isp1@pci0:2:
2011/12/28 Damien Fleuriot :
>
>
> On 12/28/11 2:07 PM, Victor Sudakov wrote:
>> Damien Fleuriot wrote:
>>>
>>> If you're trying to build up a cache to improve performance and response
>>> time, here's your scenario:
>>>
>>> DNS C, forward to DNS A,B for all queries
>>> DNS D, forward to DNS B,A fo
On 12/28/11 2:07 PM, Victor Sudakov wrote:
> Damien Fleuriot wrote:
>>
>> If you're trying to build up a cache to improve performance and response
>> time, here's your scenario:
>>
>> DNS C, forward to DNS A,B for all queries
>> DNS D, forward to DNS B,A for all queries
>>
>> Your cache will star
I am have vmcore files but kernel has compiled without -g
can I take any usefull information about 'why this problem occour'?
cat info.0 info.1 info.2
Dump header from device /dev/ad0s1b
Architecture: i386
Architecture Version: 2
Dump Length: 380215296B (362 MB)
Blocksize: 512
Dumptim
Damien Fleuriot wrote:
>
> If you're trying to build up a cache to improve performance and response
> time, here's your scenario:
>
> DNS C, forward to DNS A,B for all queries
> DNS D, forward to DNS B,A for all queries
>
> Your cache will start building up and only responses that are not cached
On 28/12/2011 07:54, Victor Sudakov wrote:
> This question is not directly related to FreeBSD, but perhaps some
> network administrators reading this list know the answer.
>
> Can I setup several ISC BIND servers to be each other's mutual forwarders?
> Will it work or create an endless loop of DNS
On 12/28/11 8:54 AM, Victor Sudakov wrote:
> Colleagues,
>
> This question is not directly related to FreeBSD, but perhaps some
> network administrators reading this list know the answer.
>
> Can I setup several ISC BIND servers to be each other's mutual forwarders?
> Will it work or create an
My friend did an installation to try it out. He is currently running Apache
for over a week with no problems. Nothing heavier was done.
--
Lyubomir Grigorov (bgalakazam)
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/li
27.12.2011 19:55, Alain G. Fabry wrote:
Hello in the FreeBSD handbook it mentions there's USB support in
Virtualbox. In other sources I read however that the VBoxPuelMain module is not
supported in FreeBSD.
VirtualBox comes with basic USB support, extension pack provides USB2.0
support.
24 matches
Mail list logo
