On 27/07/2010 6:54 AM, John Almberg wrote:
John Almberg wrote:
If you have hardware controller with RAID capabilities, using native
RAID is better, otherwise look towards gvinum or maybe ccd; see also:
I've just been reading up on RAID in my Absolute FreeBSD book, and it
occurs to me that my
Hello fellas,
I was wondering about your update strategy. Do you update your apps as soon
as a new version is available in the ports ? Or do you follow the "if it
works, don't touch it" strategy ?
I'm guessing "portupgrade" is your preferred way of doing this hence, do you
also choose -P or -PP ?
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 7:01 PM, Polytropon wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Jul 2010 18:22:21 -0500, Neal Hogan wrote:
>> No . . . not you . . . Polytropon! The end of the world must be coming
>> (Revelations-1.0).
>
> Do *NOT* tempt me. Okay, you did. And this is what will happen:
> It turns this thread int
Agreed with single user or sequential I/O systems, but with highly concurrent
random I/O, more is better. At some point with enough users even sequential I/O
becomes "random".
From: Rich
To: Gary Gatten
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Sent: Mon Jul 26 19:57:2
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 1:07 AM, John Francis Lee wrote:
> Thanks... I did that and ffmpeg did install!
>
> But...
>
> [...@28amen ~/www/robinlea.com]$ ffmpeg -i introduction.wav introduction.mp3
> FFmpeg version 0.6, Copyright (c) 2000-2010 the FFmpeg developers
> built on Jul 26 2010 22:42:00 w
that's great ! I will use /etc/mergemaster.rc to upgrade my FB 8.0.
Mike Clarke-17 wrote:
>
> On Monday 26 July 2010, zaxis wrote:
>
>> I want to upgrade my freebsd 8.0 to 8.1. I have read all the steps
>> about upgrading freebsd. I feel mergemaster is difficult to use e.g.
>> which paramet
From: Gary Gatten
Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org"
Sent: Mon, July 26, 2010 1:41:19 PM
Subject: RE: 1 file system, 2 drives?
>From my experience (YMMV), most RAID controllers will NOT redistribute the
>existing data/files onto the newly added drives. So
On 7/26/10, Glenn Sieb wrote:
> On 7/26/10 8:01 PM, Polytropon wrote:
>>,ggg, nd spotteth twice they the system before
>> dP""8I the fifth version, and so, the Programmers
>> dP 88 went Forth to RAM Gilead in Kernel Bilgemath,
>> dP88 by S
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 05:53:30PM -0500, Paul Schmehl wrote:
> --On Monday, July 26, 2010 14:06:17 -0700 David Brodbeck
> wrote:
>
> >On Mon, July 26, 2010 11:24 am, Paul Schmehl wrote:
> >>When this is the way one answers a simple question, I tend to believe
> >>there's no genuine interest in
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 01:24:21PM -0500, Paul Schmehl wrote:
> --On Saturday, July 24, 2010 00:24:46 -0600 Chad Perrin
> wrote:
> >
> >When this is the way someone starts a "discussion" about wanting to use a
> >new OS, I tend to believe there is no genuine interest in using the OS in
> >questio
On 7/26/10 8:01 PM, Polytropon wrote:
>,ggg, nd spotteth twice they the system before
> dP""8I the fifth version, and so, the Programmers
> dP 88 went Forth to RAM Gilead in Kernel Bilgemath,
> dP88 by Shell Ethra Joygalion, to the house
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 08:39:12AM -0700, Andy Balholm wrote:
>
> It's also possible that, after reading the responses to his inquiry,
> the original poster decided that his question had been adequately
> answered, his concerns were justified, and he should use a different
> operating system.
>
>
On Mon, 26 Jul 2010 18:22:21 -0500, Neal Hogan wrote:
> No . . . not you . . . Polytropon! The end of the world must be coming
> (Revelations-1.0).
Do *NOT* tempt me. Okay, you did. And this is what will happen:
It turns this thread into a bottomless pit of nonsense, but well,
you asked for it. :
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 7:47 PM, Alejandro Imass wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 6:59 PM, David Brodbeck wrote:
>> On Mon, July 26, 2010 3:53 pm, Paul Schmehl wrote:
>>> --On Monday, July 26, 2010 14:06:17 -0700 David Brodbeck
>>> wrote:
>>>
On Mon, July 26, 2010 11:24 am, Paul Schmehl wro
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 6:59 PM, David Brodbeck wrote:
> On Mon, July 26, 2010 3:53 pm, Paul Schmehl wrote:
>> --On Monday, July 26, 2010 14:06:17 -0700 David Brodbeck
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, July 26, 2010 11:24 am, Paul Schmehl wrote:
When this is the way one answers a simple question, I t
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 5:46 PM, Polytropon wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Jul 2010 14:06:17 -0700, "David Brodbeck" wrote:
>> These people
>> have been taught from a young age that logic is evil and will lead them
>> down the road to hell, so logical arguments are lost on them.
>
> Reminds me to the discus
On 7/26/10 12:35 PM, "Pegasus Mc Cleaft" wrote:
>>> By the way . . . while I think a BelssedBSD fork is a ridiculous idea,
>>> the name "BlessedBSD" is *brilliant*. Pronouncing it aloud makes the
>>> high-quality pun buried in the name more obvious, for those who didn't
>>> quite catch it on the
Thanks... I did that and ffmpeg did install!
But...
[...@28amen ~/www/robinlea.com]$ ffmpeg -i introduction.wav introduction.mp3
FFmpeg version 0.6, Copyright (c) 2000-2010 the FFmpeg developers
built on Jul 26 2010 22:42:00 with gcc 3.4.6 [FreeBSD] 20060305
configuration: --prefix=/usr/local
On Mon, 26 Jul 2010 13:00:46 -0500, Andrew Gould
wrote:
> Compiling OpenOffice is not a practical option for many of us due to
> hardware restraints.
>
> I'm glad to see that there's a compiled binary somewhere!
Additionally, there's also the problem of the various configurational
items for the
On Mon, July 26, 2010 3:53 pm, Paul Schmehl wrote:
> --On Monday, July 26, 2010 14:06:17 -0700 David Brodbeck
> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, July 26, 2010 11:24 am, Paul Schmehl wrote:
>>> When this is the way one answers a simple question, I tend to believe
>>> there's no genuine interest in dialog.
>>
>>
--On Monday, July 26, 2010 14:06:17 -0700 David Brodbeck wrote:
On Mon, July 26, 2010 11:24 am, Paul Schmehl wrote:
When this is the way one answers a simple question, I tend to believe
there's no genuine interest in dialog.
Well, I hate to break it to you, but people who are trying to make
On Mon, 26 Jul 2010 14:06:17 -0700, "David Brodbeck" wrote:
> These people
> have been taught from a young age that logic is evil and will lead them
> down the road to hell, so logical arguments are lost on them.
Reminds me to the discussion around Russell's teapot...
--
Polytropon
Magdeburg,
do this:
#make install -DFORCE_PKG_REGISTER
on that particular port, in this case /archivers/xz.
On Jul 26, 2010, at 4:34 PM, John Francis Lee wrote:
> Thanks
>
> [...@28amen /ports/multimedia/ffmpeg]$ cd ../../archivers/xz/
> [...@28amen /ports/archivers/xz]$ sudo make deinstall
> Password:
Thanks
[...@28amen /ports/multimedia/ffmpeg]$ cd ../../archivers/xz/
[...@28amen /ports/archivers/xz]$ sudo make deinstall
Password:
===> Deinstalling for archivers/xz
[...@28amen /ports/archivers/xz]$ sudo make install
===> Installing for xz-4.999.9_1
===> Generating temporary packing list
==
On Jul 26, 2010, at 2:34 PM, John Francis Lee wrote:
> Thanks
>
> [...@28amen /ports/multimedia/ffmpeg]$ cd ../../archivers/xz/
> [...@28amen /ports/archivers/xz]$ sudo make deinstall
> Password:
> ===> Deinstalling for archivers/xz
> [...@28amen /ports/archivers/xz]$ sudo make install
> ===> In
Hi--
On Jul 26, 2010, at 2:22 PM, John Francis Lee wrote:
> ===>Verifying install for /usr/local/bin/xz in /usr/ports/archivers/xz
> ===> Installing for xz-4.999.9_1
> ===> Generating temporary packing list
> ===> Checking if archivers/xz already installed
> ===> An older version of arch
Hello,
I have a VPS account at viaverio and am trying to install ffmpeg on my
server.
[...@28amen ~]$ uname -a
FreeBSD 28amen.org 6.3-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.3-RELEASE #6: Wed Oct 21
09:32:42 MDT 2009 r...@fc:/usr/src/sys/i386/compile/VKERN i386
I realize that that is an old version of FreeBSD, b
>From my experience (YMMV), most RAID controllers will NOT redistribute the
>existing data/files onto the newly added drives. So, if you have a (3) drive
>RAID5 your file exists on all three drives, as does the parity data. If you
>add (2) drives, your original files will not be on the new dri
On Mon, July 26, 2010 11:24 am, Paul Schmehl wrote:
> When this is the way one answers a simple question, I tend to believe
> there's no genuine interest in dialog.
Well, I hate to break it to you, but people who are trying to make a
religious point aren't interested in dialog, anyway. In fact, i
John Almberg wrote:
If you have hardware controller with RAID capabilities, using native
RAID is better, otherwise look towards gvinum or maybe ccd; see also:
I've just been reading up on RAID in my Absolute FreeBSD book, and it
occurs to me that my client has a SCSI RAID drive chassis that he
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 3:30 PM, John Almberg wrote:
>
> If you have hardware controller with RAID capabilities, using native RAID
>> is better, otherwise look towards gvinum or maybe ccd; see also:
>>
>>
> I've just been reading up on RAID in my Absolute FreeBSD book, and it
> occurs to me that
If you have hardware controller with RAID capabilities, using native RAID is
better, otherwise look towards gvinum or maybe ccd; see also:
I've just been reading up on RAID in my Absolute FreeBSD book, and it
occurs to me that my client has a SCSI RAID drive chassis that he is
using stupi
Oh right.. ok... sorry...
I'll try amd64
Thanks for the heads up!
Samuel Martín Moro
{EPITECH.} tek4
CamTrace S.A.S
(+033) 1 41 38 37 60
1 Allée de la Venelle
92150 Suresnes
FRANCE
"Nobody wants to say how this works.
Maybe nobody knows ..."
Xorg.conf(5)
On Mon
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 03:41:27PM -0700, Charlie Kester wrote:
> On Sun 25 Jul 2010 at 14:42:14 PDT Matthew Seaman wrote:
> >
> >Besides, I suspect that the OP was not in fact genuinely offended but
> >merely trying to stir up trouble
>
> Which makes it all the more disappointing that so many of
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 2:05 PM, Chuck Swiger wrote:
> Hi, John--
>
> On Jul 26, 2010, at 11:55 AM, John Almberg wrote:
> > I know this is probably impossible, but FreeBSD can do so many miraculous
> things, that I can't help asking...
> >
> > Is it possible to use the second drive to 'expand' th
Volodymyr/Chuck,
Is it possible to use the second drive to 'expand' the /videos file system? So
it would miraculously look like a single 400G drive?
The canonical way of doing this is to either create a RAID-0 concat or stripe
volume.
Wow, of course... I should have thought of tha
Hi, John--
On Jul 26, 2010, at 11:55 AM, John Almberg wrote:
> I know this is probably impossible, but FreeBSD can do so many miraculous
> things, that I can't help asking...
>
> Is it possible to use the second drive to 'expand' the /videos file system?
> So it would miraculously look like a s
26.07.2010 21:55, John Almberg wrote:
One of my clients has a server that hosts big public-access type videos.
He started off with a separate 200G drive just for video storage
(FreeBSD is on another drive). This video storage drive is mounted as
/videos.
He's just bought another drive, but now I
One of my clients has a server that hosts big public-access type videos.
He started off with a separate 200G drive just for video storage
(FreeBSD is on another drive). This video storage drive is mounted as
/videos.
He's just bought another drive, but now I'm thinking of what to do with
it..
Petre Bandac writes:
> Lowell Gilbert wrote:
>> "Petre Bandac" writes:
>>
>>> While upgrading port, I have the following problems:
>>> - some cfg files are overwritten (authdaemon's authmysqlrc)
>>
>> I can't figure out what port that comes from, so I can't help.
>
> courier-authlib-mysql-0.63
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 1:24 PM, Paul Schmehl wrote:
> When this is the way one answers a simple question, I tend to believe
> there's no genuine interest in dialog. I am therefore left to wonder who
> really is the intolerant one. One cannot claim to be tolerant while
> demonstrating intoleranc
--On Saturday, July 24, 2010 00:24:46 -0600 Chad Perrin
wrote:
When this is the way someone starts a "discussion" about wanting to use a
new OS, I tend to believe there is no genuine interest in using the OS in
question.
When this is the way one answers a simple question, I tend to believe th
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 12:33 PM, Chip Camden
wrote:
> Quoth Antonio Vieiro on Monday, 26 July 2010:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> For those trying to test OpenOffice 3.2.1 in FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE (no
>> official package yet):
>>
>> This:
>> ftp://ooopackages.good-day.net/pub/OpenOffice.org/FreeBSD/3.2.1/i386/O
Quoth Antonio Vieiro on Monday, 26 July 2010:
> Hi all,
>
> For those trying to test OpenOffice 3.2.1 in FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE (no
> official package yet):
>
> This:
> ftp://ooopackages.good-day.net/pub/OpenOffice.org/FreeBSD/3.2.1/i386/OOo_3.2.1_FreeBSD81Intel_install_es.tbz
>
> From
> ftp://ooo
Hi all,
For those trying to test OpenOffice 3.2.1 in FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE (no
official package yet):
This:
ftp://ooopackages.good-day.net/pub/OpenOffice.org/FreeBSD/3.2.1/i386/OOo_3.2.1_FreeBSD81Intel_install_es.tbz
From
ftp://ooopackages.good-day.net/pub/OpenOffice.org/FreeBSD/3.2.1/i386/
is
Hello,
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 17:39, Andy Balholm wrote:
> The original post looks to me like an expression of sincere concern about
> BSD's image
I'd say, if the logo is hard to cope with for some, then they may be
comforted in something of a far more importance than the logo -
FreeBSD bottom
> > By the way . . . while I think a BelssedBSD fork is a ridiculous idea,
> > the name "BlessedBSD" is *brilliant*. Pronouncing it aloud makes the
> > high-quality pun buried in the name more obvious, for those who didn't
> > quite catch it on the first read-through.
>
> i agree. lovely name. t
Suffice it to say, though there are many intuitive comments I think
that ultimately we are beating a dead horse with another dead horse
while standing on a dead horse. The corpses are starting to reek.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http:/
On Mon, 26 Jul 2010 08:39:12 -0700
Andy Balholm articulated:
> David Brodbeck wrote:
> > It also hasn't escaped my notice that the original poster has never
> > come back to this thread; I suspect we've been trolled, folks.
>
> That's possible. It's also possible that, after reading the respo
David Brodbeck wrote:
> It also hasn't escaped my notice that the original poster has never come back
> to this thread; I suspect we've been trolled, folks.
That's possible. It's also possible that, after reading the responses to his
inquiry, the original poster decided that his question had be
Original message
>Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 09:40:26 -0400
>From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org (on behalf of Tom Worster
>)
>Subject: Re: BSD logo
>To:
>
>On 7/23/10 10:01 PM, "Victor Skovorodnikov" wrote:
>
>> I have always been thinking of trying FreeBSD but as a Christian I ge
Samuel Martín Moro wrote:
> Hi
>
> I would like to install FreeBSD-8.1 ia64, so I downloaded
> FreeBSD-8.1-RELEASE-ia64-disc1.iso.
>
> When I boot from a burnt CD, the screen keeps black, with the
> blinkingunderscore,
> nothing else happend.
> When I make an USB bootable stick, I've got a messa
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 04:07:27PM +0200, Samuel Martín Moro wrote:
> Hi
>
> I would like to install FreeBSD-8.1 ia64, so I downloaded
> FreeBSD-8.1-RELEASE-ia64-disc1.iso.
>
> When I boot from a burnt CD, the screen keeps black, with the
> blinkingunderscore,
> nothing else happend.
> When I mak
Hi
I would like to install FreeBSD-8.1 ia64, so I downloaded
FreeBSD-8.1-RELEASE-ia64-disc1.iso.
When I boot from a burnt CD, the screen keeps black, with the
blinkingunderscore,
nothing else happend.
When I make an USB bootable stick, I've got a message saying that
/boot/loader was not found.
H
On 7/23/10 10:01 PM, "Victor Skovorodnikov" wrote:
> I have always been thinking of trying FreeBSD but as a Christian I get
> deterred by its un-Christian logo.
to me, devils, daemons and demons are mythological critters like elves,
pixies and bogey men.
> Have you considered changing it to so
On 7/24/10 5:59 PM, "Chad Perrin" wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 12:05:14AM -0700, David Brodbeck wrote:
>>
>> I'm reminded that the SATAN network scanner project used to ship a
>> utility with the source code that would patch it to rename it
>> "SANTA". I suppose someone could fork a new BSD
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 12:20:31AM -0500, Kevin Monceaux wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 11:29:37AM -0600, Chad Perrin wrote:
> >
> > Without downloading a PDF and reading it . . . do you know what Latin
> > variant is used in that document?
>
> No, without download and reading the PDF I wouldn'
On Monday 26 July 2010, zaxis wrote:
> I want to upgrade my freebsd 8.0 to 8.1. I have read all the steps
> about upgrading freebsd. I feel mergemaster is difficult to use e.g.
> which parameters should i use ? (you may wish to use -U or -ai or
> -Fi)
I have the following in /etc/mergemaster
On 07/26/2010 07:48, Jason wrote:
HI,ALL:
Hello,
My freebsd server offer service to thousands of clients.
I found lots of warning in the /var/log/message like this :"Approaching
the limit on PV entries, consider increasing either the
vm.pmap.shpgperproc or the vm.pmap.pv_entry_max tunable"
59 matches
Mail list logo
