Has anyone (everyone?) else been receiving these DSNs a week or so after
having posted to freebsd-questions@ ? Since around early April?
I've had four such in the last three days, and the only recipient the
messages that I posted have in common is the -questions list itself.
If it's 'just me'
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 2:42 PM, Streamlyn Technologies
wrote:
> Since its establishment in 2005 Streamlyn Technologies has actively and
> successfully been helping small to medium companies deal with:
>
> Computer hardware and software hassles and needs by providing
>
WTF?
_
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 8:37 PM, Leandro F Silva
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to know what kind of technology are you using on FreeBSD for volume
> manager, I mean, Z file system (ZFS), VINUM, GEOM, or anyone else.
> Seems that Oracle won't offer support for ZFS on opensolaris, so do you know
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
John R. Levine wrote:
> fetch http://people.freebsd.org/~glarkin/diffs/pecl-APC-3.1.3p1.diff
> patch < pecl-APC-3.1.3p1.diff
Didn't work, because pecl-APC is www/pecl-APC, not devel/pecl-APC. I
edited the patch to be www/ rather than
Hi all,
I'd like to know what kind of technology are you using on FreeBSD for volume
manager, I mean, Z file system (ZFS), VINUM, GEOM, or anyone else.
Seems that Oracle won't offer support for ZFS on opensolaris, so do you know
if FreeBSD will keep working with ZFS ?
I had some old production s
Hey list, I've searched and searched for a solution to this problem and I can't
find one.
I've got the wireless nic setup, its a Linksys WUSB54G v2.
Its picked up by the ural driver, but as far as I can tell that driver doesn't
work for it.
dmesg gives me:
ural0: MAC/BBP RT2570 (rev 0x05
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 4:38 PM, wrote:
> On 2010-04-20 02:14:20, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
>> A switch to use newer GMP version has been committed.
>>
>> I'm still investigating lang/gnat-gcc44.
>
> As far as I know, the gnat-gcc44 bootstrap binaries will be
> fine as they're bundled with the libgm
On 2010-04-20 02:14:20, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
> A switch to use newer GMP version has been committed.
>
> I'm still investigating lang/gnat-gcc44.
As far as I know, the gnat-gcc44 bootstrap binaries will be
fine as they're bundled with the libgmp library that was used
to build them. Whether gcc
A switch to use newer GMP version has been committed.
Unfortunately lang/ghc and dependent ports (and possibly
lang/gnat-gcc44) were broken by this. The brokenness wasn't detected in
our -exp run because of being masked by other issues.
It will take a few days to fix lang/ghc.
I'm still investi
On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 19:04:05 +0100
Matthew Seaman wrote:
> You could change to using csup rather than portsnap, but be aware that
> this pretty much means scrubbing all of your portsnap state. Indeed,
> for best results with csup, starting with an empty /usr/ports might be
> an idea -- I don't
I just found out that the video chip is HM55, if that helps.
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 01:52:17PM -0700, Chip Camden wrote:
> Salutations,
>
> I'm fairly new to this list and have only lurked until now. Please
> forgive me if this question has been asked before. I've exhausted the
> man pages, go
I see this error on every boot of an Intel 946GZ mobo with a Pentium D 3GHz
CPU and 2G memory. The problem does not go away after a new BIOS battery
is installed, nor does it go away after going into BIOS and re-saving
the configuration.
This machine is running 8.0-STABLE very nicely, so I don'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Joe Auty wrote:
> Greg Larkin wrote:
>> John Levine wrote:
>>> I have the same problem, recently upgraded to PHP 5.3.2 and Apache
>>> was crashing whenever I tried to use a mediawiki page until I commented
>>> out the apc library. (Apache is 2.0, Free
On 18 April 2010 15:56, J.D. Bronson wrote:
> be created by the time your system boots on.
>>
>> Nice answer by Sergio, but I personally would use the j option with tar
>> to compress to bzip2;
>>
>> 3) tar --one-file-system -cvjf /mnt/backup.tbz ./ var usr home
>>
>> Though I prefer personally t
fetch http://people.freebsd.org/~glarkin/diffs/pecl-APC-3.1.3p1.diff
patch < pecl-APC-3.1.3p1.diff
Didn't work, because pecl-APC is www/pecl-APC, not devel/pecl-APC. I
edited the patch to be www/ rather than devel/ at which point the
patch applied but make failed due to one of the other patches:
Greg Larkin wrote:
> John Levine wrote:
> > I have the same problem, recently upgraded to PHP 5.3.2 and Apache
> > was crashing whenever I tried to use a mediawiki page until I commented
> > out the apc library. (Apache is 2.0, Freebsd is still 7.0, if that
> > matters.)
>
> >> cd /usr/ports
> >>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
John Levine wrote:
> I have the same problem, recently upgraded to PHP 5.3.2 and Apache
> was crashing whenever I tried to use a mediawiki page until I commented
> out the apc library. (Apache is 2.0, Freebsd is still 7.0, if that
> matters.)
>
>> cd
Since its establishment in 2005 Streamlyn Technologies has actively and
successfully been helping small to medium companies deal with:
Computer hardware and software hassles and needs by providing
Desktop Support
After installations computers are rarely checked nor is the software managed
cor
I have the same problem, recently upgraded to PHP 5.3.2 and Apache
was crashing whenever I tried to use a mediawiki page until I commented
out the apc library. (Apache is 2.0, Freebsd is still 7.0, if that
matters.)
>cd /usr/ports
>fetch http://people.freebsd.org/~glarkin/diffs/pecl-APC-3.1.3p1.d
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Joe Auty wrote:
> Greg Larkin wrote:
>> Does pecl-APC not compile, or is it functionally broken after compiling
>> succesfully?
> It compiles, but once loaded it causes either Apache child processes to
> segfault or abort traps depending on where the e
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 19/04/2010 18:10:36, Joe Auty wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've identified my pecl-APC install as being broken after upgrading to
> PHP 5.3.2. According to the commit history listed here:
> http://www.freshports.org/www/pecl-APC/ there is a fix out. However
Greg Larkin wrote:
>
> Does pecl-APC not compile, or is it functionally broken after compiling
> succesfully?
It compiles, but once loaded it causes either Apache child processes to
segfault or abort traps depending on where the extension is listed in my
extensions.ini file. Apache itself is runnin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Joe Auty wrote:
> Hello,
Hi Joe,
>
> I've identified my pecl-APC install as being broken after upgrading to
> PHP 5.3.2.
Does pecl-APC not compile, or is it functionally broken after compiling
succesfully?
According to the commit history listed h
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 19/04/2010 16:16:21, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
> Nope. "shutdown" doesn't appear in /etc/rc.d/zfs keywords, so it won't
> get "stop" during normal shutdown. That must happen later.
Dammit. I know this really -- but for some reason i had it in my
Hello,
I've identified my pecl-APC install as being broken after upgrading to
PHP 5.3.2. According to the commit history listed here:
http://www.freshports.org/www/pecl-APC/ there is a fix out. However,
doing a portsnap fetch update does not seem to fetch this latest
revision to this port, after d
192.168.0.244's /etc/exports file says:
/usr/home1 -maproot=root 192.168.0.252
/usr/home1 -maproot=root 192.168.0.253
192.168.0.252 is the machine that should have access to 192.168.0.244's drive,
but was having difficulty obtaining it. I'm kind of surprised to see the entry
fo
What information is contained in the /etc/exports file on the NFS server? If
that changed between NFS Server restarts that _could_ be the cause.
Also, has there been any simultaneous change in the network across which the
servers speak? Especially with regard to port 111.
On 19 April 2010 15:38
ok this is the bit that worries me
That looks perfectly normal, since .museum is a TLD and doesn't have an A
record. Try about.museum, which has these records in the TLD's zone file:
about.museum.86400 IN NS nic.frd.se.
about.museum.86400 IN NS n
I rebooted the server at 192.168.0.244 and the mount_nfs command miraculously
engaged.
---
At 10:38 AM 4/19/2010, pe...@vfemail.net wrote:
>I have two servers funning FreeBSD. For the past four years, an:
>
>/sbin/mount_nfs 192.168.0.244:/usr/home1 /home1
>
>command has successfull
On 19 April 2010 16:06, John R. Levine wrote:
> I think watch i really need to do is find a root ns that is already serving
>> signed records then limit djb to that, and then i can do some testing. My
>> gut feeling is that it will be ok, but its no where near 90% let alone
>> 100%
>> which is wh
> "Sergio" == Sergio de Almeida Lenzi writes:
>> It kills everything ungracefully and will screw up anything that needs
>> to sync state to disk -- like mysql.
>>
>> Just use shutdown(8): it's what it's there for.
>>
>> # shutdown now "Going single user to make backups"
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>
I have two servers funning FreeBSD. For the past four years, an:
/sbin/mount_nfs 192.168.0.244:/usr/home1 /home1
command has successfully allowed one server access to data on the other
server's hard drive.
This morning, following reboots of both servers, the mount_nsf command fails,
r
I also use djbdns and don't expect any particular problems, since you
don't get EDNS responses if you don't make EDNS queries.
There's a one-line patch I can probably dig up which makes dnscache
accept oversized responses. Dunno if it would help, but it's unlikely
to hurt.
R's,
John
I have two servers funning FreeBSD. For the past four years, an:
/sbin/mount_nfs 192.168.0.244:/usr/home1 /home1
command has successfully allowed one server access to data on the other
server's hard drive.
This morning, following reboots of both servers, the mount_nsf command fails,
r
I think watch i really need to do is find a root ns that is already serving
signed records then limit djb to that, and then i can do some testing. My
gut feeling is that it will be ok, but its no where near 90% let alone 100%
which is why im nervous. PR nightmare if it does go wrong
The roots al
Hi there,
I'm trying to install bacula server from /usr/ports/sysutils/bacula-server and
make install aborts with the message:
===> Building for bacula-server-5.0.0
==>Entering directory /usr/ports/sysutils/bacula-server/work/bacula-5.0.0/src
==>Entering directory
/usr/ports/sysutils/bacula-s
On 19 April 2010 15:56, John Levine wrote:
> I also use djbdns and don't expect any particular problems, since you
> don't get EDNS responses if you don't make EDNS queries.
>
> There's a one-line patch I can probably dig up which makes dnscache
> accept oversized responses. Dunno if it would he
On 19 April 2010 13:06, Vincent Hoffman wrote:
> On 19/04/2010 12:12, krad wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Not strictly a freebsd question this but I'm feeling jittery about this
> as I
> > cant afford it to go wrong.
> >
> > As you are probably aware the root zones are going to be signed soon. I
> run
>
On 19/04/2010 12:12, krad wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Not strictly a freebsd question this but I'm feeling jittery about this as I
> cant afford it to go wrong.
>
> As you are probably aware the root zones are going to be signed soon. I run
> a number of heavily used dns caches (~ 600-900 queries / sec) runn
Hi,
Not strictly a freebsd question this but I'm feeling jittery about this as I
cant afford it to go wrong.
As you are probably aware the root zones are going to be signed soon. I run
a number of heavily used dns caches (~ 600-900 queries / sec) running djb
dnscache. From what I can see dnscach
Garrett Cooper skrev 2010-04-19 09:28:
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 12:25 AM, Leslie Jensen wrote:
It's now more than 10 days. Are ports stable now?
http://ragingred.files.wordpress.com/2008/10/simpsons_are-we-there-yet.jpg
In short, sorry... nope (there's still some ways to go on updating
pa
On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 09:25:06 +0200
Leslie Jensen wrote:
>
>
> It's now more than 10 days. Are ports stable now?
As written in my previous two or three mails on the subject, for now
yes.
Xorg is in the second phase of testing, and the rest are waitgin for
it. I can't give a firm ETA yet.
--
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 12:25 AM, Leslie Jensen wrote:
>
>
> It's now more than 10 days. Are ports stable now?
http://ragingred.files.wordpress.com/2008/10/simpsons_are-we-there-yet.jpg
In short, sorry... nope (there's still some ways to go on updating
packages -- porters have hit some snags wit
It's now more than 10 days. Are ports stable now?
Thanks
/Leslie
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
44 matches
Mail list logo
