On July 23, 2007, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> Andriy Babiy wrote:
> > Hi everybody,
> >
> > I'm experiencing a minor problem with xfce4 - can't enable
> > reboot/shutdown options in the menu.
> > I had the following lines in my sudoers file (I used the second one):
> > 1)
> > %groupnameALL = NOPASS
Prakash Poudyal wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I do have problem when I tried to access the file kernel file GENEREIC
> I did as follows but following error cames so could please any body
> answer me waht is exactly the problem
>
>
> ns2# /cdrom/5.5-RELEASE/src/install.sh all
>
> Extracting sources in
Hello All,
I do have problem when I tried to access the file kernel file GENEREIC
I did as follows but following error cames so could please any body
answer me waht is exactly the problem
ns2# /cdrom/5.5-RELEASE/src/install.sh all
Extracting sources into /usr/src...
Extracting source componen
Tsu-Fan Cheng wrote:
hi,
just found out that i have some mount process that cant be killed. I
was
trying to mount a digital photo frame but failed, I issued "mount_msdos
/dev/da0 /mnt" on console. After seeing it not returned, I login from
another console and killed the previous login. Now th
also good to keep in mind, that if you're going to be rebuilding the world and
updating that minimal install to -STABLE or RELEASE-p[latest], that you'll be
installing the man pages along with the updated world as well.
cheers,
--
Jonathan Horne
http://dfwlpiki.dfwlp.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
On Mon, 23 Jul 2007 18:11:38 -0500
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It compiles and runs here (6.2 & 7 i386), although
> almost none of the extensions or plugins want to
> run on it.
you can disable the version check for the extensions - they may still not run
(they may even cras
On 23/07/07, Steve Franks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm not totally opposed to what comes up in X if you start with no
.xinitrc, but it's a tad ugly. I'd ideally like to have a nifty
window manager, like one of those new 3d ones,
3d?! My VR goggles, when I jack into the global
net, only give
Tsu-Fan Cheng writes:
> i see. After running just the mlnet_real itself, the app doesnt
> consume so much power anymore. So the gui is the real problem
> here, huh?? any attempt to improve this??
For this, you will probably hace to talk to the developers
Here's a followup, so anyone checking the archives
will know what to do... (and if it helps the group
overall, even better)
Much thanks to those who tried to help. As I was
running a Pentium on an Intel board, it never
occurred to me to even look at the amd64 variant,
until I realized the one g
hi,
just found out that i have some mount process that cant be killed. I was
trying to mount a digital photo frame but failed, I issued "mount_msdos
/dev/da0 /mnt" on console. After seeing it not returned, I login from
another console and killed the previous login. Now the mount process is
still
I better try avant, k-meleon ,, I am not very happy with FF/IE.. They are
slow.. They use a lot of resources..
Thanks
http://dominor.net
On 7/23/07, Tsu-Fan Cheng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
sorry, i didnt notice that its the "devel" version. I just saw it in the
freebsd.org/ports page. a
sorry, i didnt notice that its the "devel" version. I just saw it in the
freebsd.org/ports page. anyhow, I initial attempt was to find a alternative
browser to firefox. On windows, there are avant, k-meleon and such, they are
pretty good and fast compared to ff/IE. I wonder if there is any such cl
http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/nightly/latest-trunk/
Troy
http://primoris.com
On 7/23/07, Anton Galitch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/23/07, Tsu-Fan Cheng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>just browser the port directory and discovered that firefox 3.0 is in
> the
>
I got Firefox 3.0 Alpha 7 / 2.0.0.5 / 1.5.0.12
No problem so far ...
Thanks
Troy
http://dominor.com
*
*On 7/23/07, Tsu-Fan Cheng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
just browser the port directory and discovered that firefox 3.0 is in
the
system, before i upgrade to that, would like to know if
>
> Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote:
> >
> > himinbjorg# ldd work/bdftopcf-1.0.1/bdftopcf
> > work/bdftopcf-1.0.1/bdftopcf:
> > libXfont.so.1 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libXfont.so.1 (0x2808)
> > libc.so.5 => /lib/libc.so.5 (0x280e6000)
> >
> > WHY when the cc step is stating -L/usr/local/lib is
On 23/07/07, Tsu-Fan Cheng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
just browser the port directory and discovered that firefox 3.0 is in the
system, before i upgrade to that, would like to know if *everything* works
fine with this version, especially the flash plugin, thank you !!
It compiles and ru
On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 07:53:14PM -0300, Anton Galitch wrote:
> On 7/23/07, Tsu-Fan Cheng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>just browser the port directory and discovered that firefox 3.0 is in
>> the
>> system, before i upgrade to that, would like to know if *everything* works
>> fine wi
On 7/23/07, Tsu-Fan Cheng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
just browser the port directory and discovered that firefox 3.0 is in
the
system, before i upgrade to that, would like to know if *everything* works
fine with this version, especially the flash plugin, thank you !!
TFC
Hi,
just browser the port directory and discovered that firefox 3.0 is in the
system, before i upgrade to that, would like to know if *everything* works
fine with this version, especially the flash plugin, thank you !!
TFC
___
freebsd-questions@freebs
i see. After running just the mlnet_real itself, the app doesnt consume so
much power anymore. So the gui is the real problem here, huh?? any attempt
to improve this??
ciao,
TFC
On 7/23/07, Danny Woods <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 04:44:17PM -0400, Tsu-Fan Cheng wrote:
>
On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 04:44:17PM -0400, Tsu-Fan Cheng wrote:
> Hi,
> I run mldonkey (mlnet+gui) on freebsd 6.2 and found it takes up a lot of
> CPU resources. Is this a common thing or just me.
I run mlnet 2.8.7 *without* the GUI on 6.2 on a 533MHz VIA C3 (hardly a
powerhorse) and it consumes
Tsu-Fan Cheng writes:
> I run mldonkey (mlnet+gui) on freebsd 6.2 and found it takes
> up a lot of CPU resources. Is this a common thing or just
> me. Also, is there something else, e.g. amule, xmule that
> runs a little lighters on the system?? thank you!!
From "top" a
Hi there,
might somebody be able to recommend a good XML repository that keeps
files in XML format but still viewable, uploadable, downloadable, and
searchable via a web front-end?
Cheers,
Noah
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://
On Mon, 23 Jul 2007 16:44:17 -0400
"Tsu-Fan Cheng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>I run mldonkey (mlnet+gui) on freebsd 6.2 and found it takes up a
> lot of CPU resources.
What happens if you shut down the gui. The good thing about mldonkey is
that most of the time you don't need it.
At 02:06 PM 7/23/2007, John Clement wrote:
So I got a copy of boot-only 6.2 onto cd and went back into the bios and
changed a few options:
LBA mode: off
Multi-sector transfers: auto
Fast PIO: auto
32 bit transfer mode: on
Ultra DMA: auto
then ran the 6.2 install using dangerously dedicated whic
Hi,
I run mldonkey (mlnet+gui) on freebsd 6.2 and found it takes up a lot of
CPU resources. Is this a common thing or just me. Also, is there something
else, e.g. amule, xmule that runs a little lighters on the system?? thank
you!!
TFC
___
freebsd-que
On Mon, 23 Jul 2007 21:22:52 +0200
Martin Schweizer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello RW
>
> Am Sun, Jul 22, 2007 at 10:16:50PM +0100 RW schrieb:
> > > I read UPDATING and did all the steps described there.
> >
> > No, you didn't because /usr/ports/x11/xorg-libraries/Makefile
> > contains a li
Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote:
>
> himinbjorg# ldd work/bdftopcf-1.0.1/bdftopcf
> work/bdftopcf-1.0.1/bdftopcf:
> libXfont.so.1 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libXfont.so.1 (0x2808)
> libc.so.5 => /lib/libc.so.5 (0x280e6000)
>
> WHY when the cc step is stating -L/usr/local/lib is it bring the
Hello RW
Am Sun, Jul 22, 2007 at 10:16:50PM +0100 RW schrieb:
> > I read UPDATING and did all the steps described there.
>
> No, you didn't because /usr/ports/x11/xorg-libraries/Makefile contains
> a little test to make sure you have read UPDATING.
No, it's not correct. I followed the steps fro
I have the Freebsd 6.2 version.
I got a problem installing from my DVD ROM drive, and I found a patch in
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/111084 .
I wonder if I could try this patch to solve my problem.
What may I do to get a FreeBSD with this patch working?
I need get the source
Dear folks,
whenever I try to attach gdb to my firefox settings because I'm expecting
firefox to be the source of my stability problems (I always find a gnash.core
and a firefox.core file in my home directory) I get the following error message:
gdb --quiet
(gdb) attach 11808
Attaching to proces
So I got a copy of boot-only 6.2 onto cd and went back into the bios and
changed a few options:
LBA mode: off
Multi-sector transfers: auto
Fast PIO: auto
32 bit transfer mode: on
Ultra DMA: auto
then ran the 6.2 install using dangerously dedicated which went fine and
then on reboot now it comes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 7/23/07, Steve Franks wrote:
I'm not totally opposed to what comes up in X if you start with no
.xinitrc, but it's a tad ugly. I'd ideally like to have a nifty
window manager, like one of those new 3d ones, but I find no point in
running kde/g
> Now i have the version 7.02 of xorg. when i do Xorg -config
> /root/xorg.config, i have as response: could not read default font
> fixed. what does it mean? what i must do?
>
I wonder if you might be having part of a problem I'm sure to
expect to have... Do this for me please to see if
oug wrote:
On Mon, 23 Jul 2007, Boudjema wrote:
Bonjour,
Please excuses,
my english is bad, so i will explain in french my problem if this is
not understood;
i have a problem to install x window. my hope is to install kde. but
without x, i am stopped; when i do pkg_add -r xorg, the response
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm following the directions to upgrade Xorg (REALLY I AM, PROMISE!)
> and I'm seeing this fly by my screen :
>
> /usr/local/bin/bdftopcf -t lubR12-ISO8859-13.bdf | gzip >
> lubR12-ISO8859-13.pcf.gz
> /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/X11R6/lib/libXfont.so.1: Undefined symbol
> "ser
On Jul 22, 2007, at 9:04 PM, Olivier Nicole wrote:
With some delay, several answers together.
Very good. :-)
For the example I gave, I am of course authoritative.
Are you? Depending on which servers I query, I either get an
NXDOMAIN, an answer with no authoritative nameservers listed, or t
Hi,
I'm following the directions to upgrade Xorg (REALLY I AM, PROMISE!)
and I'm seeing this fly by my screen :
/usr/local/bin/bdftopcf -t lubR12-ISO8859-13.bdf | gzip >
lubR12-ISO8859-13.pcf.gz
/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/X11R6/lib/libXfont.so.1: Undefined symbol
"serverClient"
/usr/loc
On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 11:49:40AM +0200, Michael Nottebrock wrote:
> Gary Kline schrieb:
> > Apologies for the triple postings, but this is general enough
> > for the -questions list and aimed at the gnome list. It
> > includes a query for the KDE list.
> >
> > I just opened a "ko
I'm not totally opposed to what comes up in X if you start with no
.xinitrc, but it's a tad ugly. I'd ideally like to have a nifty
window manager, like one of those new 3d ones, but I find no point in
running kde/gnome/xfce - I launch everything (firefox, etc.) from a
prompt anyway. So howto? I
Florent Thoumie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Yuri Pankov wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 14, 2007 at 02:21:09AM -0700, Dino Vliet wrote:
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> I'm having problems with my monitor on freebsd. The vesa driver uses
>> 1024X768 while the monitor is capable of doing 1680x1050.
>>
>> Observed here as
On Sun, 22 Jul 2007 22:07:43 -0400
Michael Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> A partner and I recently purchased a dedicated FreeBSD box. We're
> currently using Plesk (blech!) to manage client domains and such.
> I'm curious though as to what the best (most manageable) setup
On 23/07/07, Matthew Seaman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
David N wrote:
> pid 96087 (conftest), uid 0: exited on signal 11 (core dumped)
> Are the conftest core dumps anything to worry about?
Actually, these are deliberate. GNU autoconf will eng
Gary Kline schrieb:
> Apologies for the triple postings, but this is general enough
> for the -questions list and aimed at the gnome list. It
> includes a query for the KDE list.
>
> I just opened a "konsole", the KDE-hacked xterm, IIRC. I had the
> BEL set to "syste
On Mon, 23 Jul 2007 12:09:51 +0100 (BST)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In Mplayers makefile it says 'Wants Gnome' - does this mean that
> making it would drag in all the gnome libs etc ?
No it doesn't. It's more a matter co-ordinating with gnome.
___
free
On Mon, 23 Jul 2007 04:54:36 +0200
"Antonio Évora" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But I also ask you... when I
> installed XFCE and GDM, Shouldnt have their dependencies already
> installed the basics of xorg so I could run the X?
I'm not sure that they should, you might be building an application
s
In Mplayers makefile it says 'Wants Gnome' - does this mean that making it
would drag in all the gnome libs etc ? I was hoping for a text / cli mode
dvd player would work under X ? Also, does anyone know of a FreeBSd
version of MyBashBurn ? Thanks !
___
On 2007-07-23 12:26, Zbigniew Szalbot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/i386/6.2-RELEASE/manpages/
> >
> > [4] Run the 'install.sh' script as root:
>
> Need to chmod it to have appropriate permissions but thank you! I now
> enjoy man pages for all the defau
Dear Giorgos,
>> Thanks for your answer. You probably did not read my post. I do this
>> via sysinstall and it fails.
>
> Ah, I apologize for that. You are right, of course; I misread at least
> part of the original post. I obviously need more coffee before I am
> fully aware of the reality ar
On 2007-07-23 11:31, Zbigniew Szalbot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> When I went for FreeBSD, I chose the minimal distribution and as a
>>> result do not have man pages. I would like to install them but when
>>> I specify an fpt server (via sysinstall) I get:
>>>
>>> Unable to transfer the manpages
Hi,
>> When I went for FreeBSD, I chose the minimal distribution and as a
> result
>> do not have man pages. I would like to install them but when I specify
> an
>> fpt server (via sysinstall) I get:
>>
>> Unable to transfer the manpages distribution from ftp://ftp.freebsd.org.
>>
>> This is 6.2-
On 2007-07-23 11:12, Zbigniew Szalbot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> When I went for FreeBSD, I chose the minimal distribution and as a result
> do not have man pages. I would like to install them but when I specify an
> fpt server (via sysinstall) I get:
>
> Unable to transfer the manpa
Hello,
When I went for FreeBSD, I chose the minimal distribution and as a result
do not have man pages. I would like to install them but when I specify an
fpt server (via sysinstall) I get:
Unable to transfer the manpages distribution from ftp://ftp.freebsd.org.
This is 6.2-RELEASE-p6 #4. I cha
Hello my name is Chris McDonald
I am seeking out possible link partners that our visitors would be
interesting in visiting.
I've found your website (http://www.pl.freebsd.org/) to be a very good fit
for our visitors.
I would like to go ahead and add your link to our website, but before I do,
I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
David N wrote:
> pid 96087 (conftest), uid 0: exited on signal 11 (core dumped)
> Are the conftest core dumps anything to worry about?
Actually, these are deliberate. GNU autoconf will engineer a SEGV
in a piece of test code in order to test var
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Elan marikit wrote:
> Do we have already a tool equivalent to libux's ethtool?
ifconfig(8). In FreeBSD it's a lot more capable than in Linux.
Cheers,
Matthew
- --
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courty
Andriy Babiy wrote:
Hi everybody,
I'm experiencing a minor problem with xfce4 - can't enable
reboot/shutdown options in the menu.
I had the following lines in my sudoers file (I used the second one):
1)
%groupnameALL = NOPASSWD:/usr/local/libexec/xfsm-shutdown-helper
2)
ALIAS_NAME ALL =
Hi,
pid 96087 (conftest), uid 0: exited on signal 11 (core dumped)
I've been googling around and people say its usually a hardware
problem or memory. I've done memtest86+ on all of them and it returned
fine. (I know it doesn't mean there isn't a problem), HDD SMART is all
good. But I've been get
Hi everybody,
I'm experiencing a minor problem with xfce4 - can't enable
reboot/shutdown options in the menu.
I had the following lines in my sudoers file (I used the second one):
1)
%groupnameALL = NOPASSWD:/usr/local/libexec/xfsm-shutdown-helper
2)
ALIAS_NAME ALL = (ALL) NOPASSWD: AL
On Mon, 23 Jul 2007 04:54:36 +0200
"Antonio Évora" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Basically it seems that it cant found /usr/local/bin/X because in fact
> it doesnt exist. I would like to know which port/s do I have to
> install for avoiding the meta port of xorg 7.2 which would install a
> lot of t
60 matches
Mail list logo
