Vinum shows 0% space used

2004-07-07 Thread Mario Doria
Hi, Im running 5-CURRENT on a machine with vinum enabled, its works perfectly but the command "vinum ld" gives only this output: vinum -> ld D tecdigital2 State: up /dev/da3s1e A: 0/35016 MB (0%) D tecdigital1 State: up /dev/da2s1e A: 0/35016 MB (0%) D var

Re: Network configuration in FreeBSD

2004-07-07 Thread uidzero
Miguel Cardenas wrote: Hello Am new to FreeBSD... just installed it for 2nd time today, but don't know what I did that it didn't ask me for the network configuration (ip, domain, etc)... once installed, is there a command to perform that task? I'm linux user, so am familiar to *nix systems, but

Network configuration in FreeBSD

2004-07-07 Thread Miguel Cardenas
Hello Am new to FreeBSD... just installed it for 2nd time today, but don't know what I did that it didn't ask me for the network configuration (ip, domain, etc)... once installed, is there a command to perform that task? I'm linux user, so am familiar to *nix systems, but don't know how to con

Freebsd com/non-com user list

2004-07-07 Thread jim
I'm trying to find out where the hyperlink to the commercial and regular users of FreeBSD went! This is where I found the HungryProgrammers I'm not looking for their site but the link you guys had that listed many many many com/non-com users who use FreeBSD? I've looked at it in the past but

Texas Instruments Laptop

2004-07-07 Thread David Wiebe
Hi, I am trying to install freebsd from a cdrom onto my Texas Instruments Laptop Model Extensa 650 CD. It has a 133Mhz processor(intel), a 5Gbyte HD and 32 Megs Ram. The problem I run into is that when booting from the CDROM, after going past the page where it asks you if you want to continue

Re: allowing users to mount cdrom again

2004-07-07 Thread Gautam Gopalakrishnan
On Thu, 8 Jul 2004 00:41:59 +0200, Grant Speelman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi > > I read in the previous post about allowing users to mount cdrom and > wanted to try it for myself > I did the follow : > > added vfs.usermount=1 to /etc/sysctl.conf > changed the permissions on /dev/acd0 to incl

RE: Devices not being built

2004-07-07 Thread Mike Sacauskis
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nathan Kinkade Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2004 3:02 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Devices not being built On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 08:12:35PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >

Re: Turning off submission (587) port

2004-07-07 Thread Oliver Fuchs
On Wed, 07 Jul 2004, Chris wrote: > Folks, > I would prefer to shut this port down if I can. I'm unsure if and how it > can/do it. Other then that, would there be an effective ipfw rule that would > block this? > > If the above needs recompiling sendmail, then I would certainly pref

peace

2004-07-07 Thread agha dilbar
Change the World with Peace and Prosperity 10-Million Urgent Peace letters to Head of States, UN, Parliaments, Political Parties, TV News Channels,International Newspapers, Magazines, Universities, Think tanks, AmnestyInternational and Welfare NGO’s, all over the WorldSubject: Friendship, Progr

Re: WPC11 ver 3 or bust...

2004-07-07 Thread Andrew L. Gould
On Wednesday 07 July 2004 09:23 pm, Eric Crist wrote: > Hey all, > > I posted almost a week ago about not being able to use my 16-bit > PCMCIA Linksys WPC-11 v3 wifi card. This card always worked well > under 4.9, but I can't get it to work under 5.2.1. The card is > recognized, and I can even as

RE: dns/sendmail/resolve problems...

2004-07-07 Thread Eric Crist
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gary Kline > Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2004 9:21 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: dns/sendmail/resolve problems... > > > > On "tao" sendmail hangs forevr before it ever strts up. > Anybo

WPC11 ver 3 or bust...

2004-07-07 Thread Eric Crist
Hey all, I posted almost a week ago about not being able to use my 16-bit PCMCIA Linksys WPC-11 v3 wifi card. This card always worked well under 4.9, but I can't get it to work under 5.2.1. The card is recognized, and I can even assign IP addresses and such, but it never associates to my wireles

dns/sendmail/resolve problems...

2004-07-07 Thread Gary Kline
On "tao" sendmail hangs forevr before it ever strts up. Anybody know why? thanks garY -- Gary Kline [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.thought.org Public service Unix ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.fr

Re: Which branch to use as tag for 5.2.1?

2004-07-07 Thread Trey Sizemore
On Thu, 2004-07-08 at 04:05 +0200, Erik Trulsson wrote: > What you want is RELENG_5, which doesn't exist yet. It will be created > when 5.x is considered to be the new -STABLE. Until then you can > either follow -CURRENT (which is the "branch" leading up to the next > 5.x release just as RELENG_4

Re: Which branch to use as tag for 5.2.1?

2004-07-07 Thread Erik Trulsson
On Thu, Jul 08, 2004 at 03:01:11AM +0200, Rickard Borgmäster wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying out FBSD 5.2.1 at the moment to see if it will work OK with my > onboard VIA 8237 SATA Controller, which didn't work that fine in 4.10. > > I'm about to do a buildworld. But I have a little difficult understa

Re: Which branch to use as tag for 5.2.1?

2004-07-07 Thread Andrew L. Gould
On Wednesday 07 July 2004 08:01 pm, Rickard Borgmäster wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying out FBSD 5.2.1 at the moment to see if it will work OK > with my onboard VIA 8237 SATA Controller, which didn't work that fine > in 4.10. > > I'm about to do a buildworld. But I have a little difficult > understandin

Re: where o where is it starting from

2004-07-07 Thread Bill Moran
"Mark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Never mind. I found it. > /etc/defaults/rc.conf > I thought /etc/rc.conf overrode the other. In /etc/rc.conf I put sendmail > and inetd to NO but they were still starting up. Don't modify /etc/defaults/rc.conf /etc/rc.conf _does_ override /etc/defaults/rc.conf

query iir(4) device for disk status

2004-07-07 Thread Edwin Groothuis
Hi, Does anybody know how I can query the status of the disks accessed via the iir(4) device (Intel Integrated RAID)? Edwin -- Edwin Groothuis |Personal website: http://www.mavetju.org [EMAIL PROTECTED]| Weblog: http://weblog.barnet.com.au/edwin/ __

Which branch to use as tag for 5.2.1?

2004-07-07 Thread Rickard Borgmäster
Hi, I'm trying out FBSD 5.2.1 at the moment to see if it will work OK with my onboard VIA 8237 SATA Controller, which didn't work that fine in 4.10. I'm about to do a buildworld. But I have a little difficult understanding what tag to set in my cvsupfile? I want something similar to RELENG_4 but

Re: FreeBSD via BitTorrent

2004-07-07 Thread Gautam Gopalakrishnan
On Wed, 07 Jul 2004 16:39:53 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Does anyone know if there is an official release available for current (5.2.1) via > BitTorrent. http://www.opentorrent.org/ Gautam ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list ht

Re: postmap main.cf

2004-07-07 Thread Joshua Lewis
> main.cf doesn't get postmaped. > only the .map files do. > > unless its changed since i last upgraded. I have never set up Postfix. In fact I have never set up any e-mail server. I am following a document titled: Creating a Stable Secure FreeBSD MailServer found on http://www.bsdhound.com You

allowing users to mount cdrom again

2004-07-07 Thread Grant Speelman
Hi I read in the previous post about allowing users to mount cdrom and wanted to try it for myself I did the follow : added vfs.usermount=1 to /etc/sysctl.conf changed the permissions on /dev/acd0 to include the user restarted freebsd (It's amazing what a restart does for me sometimes) but this

cvsup behind windows xp

2004-07-07 Thread Grant Speelman
Hi there I got the small problem, I would like to keep my ports collection update using cvsup but I don't have a direct connection to the internet. My Computer is on a network with my Fathers computer which is running windows xp. Lets say I have full access to my fathers computer as long I do

Re: where o where is it starting from

2004-07-07 Thread Mark
Never mind. I found it. /etc/defaults/rc.conf I thought /etc/rc.conf overrode the other. In /etc/rc.conf I put sendmail and inetd to NO but they were still starting up. Mark - Original Message - From: "Mark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2004 6:32

Re: where o where is it starting from

2004-07-07 Thread Bill Moran
"Mark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Howdy, > I replaced the sendmail with postfix. > However on boot up I get a error: > Starting Standard daemons : inetd cron sshd sendmail-submitsendmail: illegal > option --0 > sendmail: fatal usage : sendmail [options] > Jul 7 18:38:40 spiderman postfix/sendmai

Re: postmap main.cf

2004-07-07 Thread Joshua Lewis
> main.cf doesn't get postmaped. > only the .map files do. > > unless its changed since i last upgraded. I have never set up Postfix. In fact I have never set up any e-mail server. I am following a document titled: Creating a Stable Secure FreeBSD MailServer found on http://www.bsdhound.com You

where o where is it starting from

2004-07-07 Thread Mark
Howdy, I replaced the sendmail with postfix. However on boot up I get a error: Starting Standard daemons : inetd cron sshd sendmail-submitsendmail: illegal option --0 sendmail: fatal usage : sendmail [options] Jul 7 18:38:40 spiderman postfix/sendmail[83]: fatal:usage: sendmail [options} sendmail-

Re: bypass no new partitions protection ?

2004-07-07 Thread Bill Moran
"Hugo Silva" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all > > In one of my servers I left a 80GB disk unpartitioned to later partitition > it according to my needs, only to have sysinstall always complain it > couldn't write to ad1. I've googled a bit and it seems its related to some > kind of protection t

Re: making without threads

2004-07-07 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 03:11:55PM -0700, David Bear wrote: > I'm trying to use the python 2.3.4 port. I tried to issue > > make --without-threads > > but its still is making it with threads. make help doesn't.. > > the pkg_* files don't seem to be much help. > > how do I list and change make

making without threads

2004-07-07 Thread David Bear
I'm trying to use the python 2.3.4 port. I tried to issue make --without-threads but its still is making it with threads. make help doesn't.. the pkg_* files don't seem to be much help. how do I list and change make options? -- David Bear phone: 480-965-8257 fax:480-965-9189 College of

Re: Mon? (or a substitute monitoring daemon)

2004-07-07 Thread Bill Moran
Dan Finn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Nagios. > > I have used it at my current and previous employer and it works very > well. Many more features than mon IMO. Thanks for the input. I also found Big Sister, which looks pretty nice. Not sure which one I'll use, but this gives me lots to evaluat

Re: Devices not being built

2004-07-07 Thread Nathan Kinkade
On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 08:12:35PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 05:44:02AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Hi > > > > > > I've built a FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE #5 kernel. I have a linksys WMP 11 > wi> reless > > > card. > > > I've configured and built the kernel

Re: postmap main.cf

2004-07-07 Thread Bill Moran
"Joshua Lewis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am trying to set up Postfix on 4.10 and when trying to run: > > postmap main.cf > > I get a postmap not found error. > > Can anyone tell me where this program is located or a way to search my > system for the program. whereis postmap find / -name p

Re: postmap main.cf

2004-07-07 Thread uidzero
Joshua Lewis wrote: I am trying to set up Postfix on 4.10 and when trying to run: postmap main.cf I get a postmap not found error. Can anyone tell me where this program is located or a way to search my system for the program. Thank you, Joshua Lewis ___

Re: postmap main.cf

2004-07-07 Thread Chuck Swiger
Joshua Lewis wrote: I am trying to set up Postfix on 4.10 and when trying to run: postmap main.cf I get a postmap not found error. Can anyone tell me where this program is located or a way to search my system for the program. "locate postmap", "which postmap", or "find / -name postmap" are possible

postmap main.cf

2004-07-07 Thread Joshua Lewis
I am trying to set up Postfix on 4.10 and when trying to run: postmap main.cf I get a postmap not found error. Can anyone tell me where this program is located or a way to search my system for the program. Thank you, Joshua Lewis ___ [EMAIL PROTE

OpenSSL with threads enabled, problem getting it to install

2004-07-07 Thread Gene Gilbert
Hello, Firstly I am fairly new to FreeBSD and I have been stuck on this for a couple of weeks now. I am installing a web server, Resin, that in order to run ssl connections needs to have openssl compiled with threads enabled. I am running FreeBSD 4.10 Stable, it is brand new computer with a cle

Re: A few simple questions(...if you don't mind)

2004-07-07 Thread Andy Holyer
On 6 Jul 2004, at 11:36, Erik Trulsson wrote: If you go back a bit further in time there was the Great Worm of 1988, which targeted VAX and Sun3 systems running BSD code, and which actually did bring down most of the Internet at the time. That was the incident that got people in the Unix community

FreeBSD via BitTorrent

2004-07-07 Thread adstro
Does anyone know if there is an official release available for current (5.2.1) via BitTorrent. Thanks ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: maillog

2004-07-07 Thread Chris
On Wednesday 07 July 2004 03:07 pm, Gary Kline wrote: > Here is part of /var/log/maillog. Does this suggest > anything?? > > > Jul 7 12:53:13 sage sm-mta[291]: i67Jqns6000291: --- 221 2.0.0 > ns1.thought.org closing connection Jul 7 12:53:13 sage sm-mta[295]: > i67Jqns5000291: --- 050 <[EM

maillog

2004-07-07 Thread Gary Kline
Here is part of /var/log/maillog. Does this suggest anything?? Jul 7 12:53:13 sage sm-mta[291]: i67Jqns6000291: --- 221 2.0.0 ns1.thought.org closing connection Jul 7 12:53:13 sage sm-mta[295]: i67Jqns5000291: --- 050 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... Connecting to tao.thought.org. via relay.

RE: pf on 4.10

2004-07-07 Thread hamlet
as far as i remember, that's correct. this is moderately fuzzy memory from the 'state of freebsd' presentation at usenix, but appears to match my rather sketchy notes. ~hamlet On Wed, 7 Jul 2004, JJB wrote: > Please clarify; > > It's my understanding that in 5.3 pf will be delivered as the 3rd

Re: Turning off submission (587) port

2004-07-07 Thread Bill Moran
Dick Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [0701 18:01]: > > Folks, > > I would prefer to shut this port down if I can. I'm unsure if and how it > > can/do it. Other then that, would there be an effective ipfw rule that would > > block this? > > > > If the abov

Re: portsclean -DD

2004-07-07 Thread Conrad J. Sabatier
On 07-Jul-2004 Randy Pratt wrote: > On Wed, 07 Jul 2004 12:25:39 -0500 (CDT) > "Conrad J. Sabatier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> I understand that -D specified once cleans out any distfiles for >> ports which are not currently installed, but specified twice, does >> it *only* clean out distfi

Re: Mon? (or a substitute monitoring daemon)

2004-07-07 Thread Nico Meijer
Hey Bill, If not, what do folks recommend for service monitoring? monit[1] and monitord[2]. I mainly use FreeBSD and OpenBSD boxes right now, and I couldn't get monitord to run on OpenBSD, so I've switched to monit. There's a security warning roaming about on monit and http, so don't get bitten.

Re: Turning off submission (587) port

2004-07-07 Thread Dick Davies
* Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [0701 18:01]: > Folks, > I would prefer to shut this port down if I can. I'm unsure if and how it > can/do it. Other then that, would there be an effective ipfw rule that would > block this? > > If the above needs recompiling sendmail, then I would certain

Re: portsclean -DD

2004-07-07 Thread Randy Pratt
On Wed, 07 Jul 2004 12:25:39 -0500 (CDT) "Conrad J. Sabatier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The man page for portsclean is a little vague on the exact semantics of > using "portsclean -DD". > > I understand that -D specified once cleans out any distfiles for ports > which are not currently install

RE: pf on 4.10

2004-07-07 Thread JJB
Please clarify; It's my understanding that in 5.3 pf will be delivered as the 3rd built in firewall solution. It will have it's own boot time loadable module just like ipfilter. No kernel recompile needed to enable it. Is this correct? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:

APM and DRI lockups when suspending

2004-07-07 Thread Sean Welch
Duane, there have always been issues with this aspect of APM. I have found it sufficient to run two X servers to handle the issue. Most of my software runs in an X session without DRI enabled and then when I want to run accelerated 3D I just start up another X session with DRI enabled. For exampl

Re: Mon? (or a substitute monitoring daemon)

2004-07-07 Thread Dan Finn
Nagios. I have used it at my current and previous employer and it works very well. Many more features than mon IMO. On Wed, 7 Jul 2004 14:06:01 -0400, Bill Moran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm replacing some Debian servers with FreeBSD machines ... > > I'm having a little trouble with "mon

Mon? (or a substitute monitoring daemon)

2004-07-07 Thread Bill Moran
I'm replacing some Debian servers with FreeBSD machines ... I'm having a little trouble with "mon" ... the service monitoring daemon for Linux. It doesn't appear as if there's a FreeBSD port. Is there a FreeBSD port of mon, and I'm just searching the ports wrong? I'd like to continue to use mon

Re: pf on 4.10

2004-07-07 Thread hamlet
that's coming in 5.3-RELEASE ~hamlet On Wed, 16 Jun 2004, JJB wrote: > Is there an port of pf firewall that installs on 4.10? > > ___ > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send

APM and DRI lockups when suspending

2004-07-07 Thread Duane Winner
Does anybody know if there is a workaround for the problem with DRI and APM within X? If I load the DRI module in my XF86Config file, and attempt to suspend my laptop, the system freezes on resume, then reboots. If I comment out the line "Load dri" out of the Module section in /etc/X11/XF86Con

Re: Can't install kdebase

2004-07-07 Thread Manuel Astudillo
On Wednesday 07 July 2004 11.13, Jason Oakley wrote: > Resend as my previous emails didn't seem to arrive. > > I can't get kdebase to install. > This is a new FreeBSD build from Mini ISO. kde has not been installed on > here before. > I first installed evolution. Now KDE. > I've tried building from

Re: Turning off submission (587) port

2004-07-07 Thread Chris
On Wednesday 07 July 2004 12:24 pm, Gregory Neil Shapiro wrote: > > AFAIK, it is sufficient to edit /etc/mail/sendmail.cf and > > comment or delete the follwoing line: > > O DaemonPortOptions=Port=587, Name=MSA, M=E > > and restart sendmail afterwards. > > Hand editing the sendmail.cf is a bad ide

Re: Turning off submission (587) port

2004-07-07 Thread Chico
Gregory, Great reply... I like how you gave the exact instructions. Shawn --- Gregory Neil Shapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I would prefer to shut this port down if I can. > I'm unsure if and how it > > can/do it. Other then that, would there be an > effective ipfw rule that would >

portsclean -DD

2004-07-07 Thread Conrad J. Sabatier
The man page for portsclean is a little vague on the exact semantics of using "portsclean -DD". I understand that -D specified once cleans out any distfiles for ports which are not currently installed, but specified twice, does it *only* clean out distfiles that are unreferenced by any port in the

Re: Turning off submission (587) port

2004-07-07 Thread Gregory Neil Shapiro
> AFAIK, it is sufficient to edit /etc/mail/sendmail.cf and > comment or delete the follwoing line: > O DaemonPortOptions=Port=587, Name=MSA, M=E > and restart sendmail afterwards. Hand editing the sendmail.cf is a bad idea. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailin

Re: Turning off submission (587) port

2004-07-07 Thread Gregory Neil Shapiro
> I would prefer to shut this port down if I can. I'm unsure if and how it > can/do it. Other then that, would there be an effective ipfw rule that would > block this? 1. cd /etc/mail/ 2. Edit `hostname`.mc (if it doesn't exist, "cd /etc/mail; make") 3. Add this next to one of the other FE

Re: Turning off submission (587) port

2004-07-07 Thread Thomas Wolf
Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > Folks, > I would prefer to shut this port down if I can. I'm unsure if and how it > can/do it. Other then that, would there be an effective ipfw rule that would > block this? > > If the above needs recompiling sendmail, then I would certainly prefer the >

Re: Sendmail hand upon boot and restart

2004-07-07 Thread Gary Kline
On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 11:07:11AM -0500, Eric Crist wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > > Steve Bertrand > > Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2004 8:32 AM > > To: Gary Kline > > Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List > > Subject: Re: Sendmail h

Re: Sendmail hand upon boot and restart

2004-07-07 Thread Gary Kline
On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 09:32:12AM -0400, Steve Bertrand wrote: > > > > > > After a year I'm finally upgrading DNS servers, and having > > a bad time getting sendmail and dhcp to work. I may finally > > have dhcp woking on ns1.thought.org. ping works and my > > /var/log/maillog is filling up. B

Turning off submission (587) port

2004-07-07 Thread Chris
Folks, I would prefer to shut this port down if I can. I'm unsure if and how it can/do it. Other then that, would there be an effective ipfw rule that would block this? If the above needs recompiling sendmail, then I would certainly prefer the latter. -- Best regards, Chris -

RE: Sendmail hand upon boot and restart

2004-07-07 Thread Eric Crist
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Steve Bertrand > Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2004 8:32 AM > To: Gary Kline > Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List > Subject: Re: Sendmail hand upon boot and restart > > > > > > > > After a year I'm finally upgrading

RE: BandwidthD syntax error?

2004-07-07 Thread Eric Crist
Here you go! =START CONFIG= subnet 63.228.14.240 255.255.255.248 dev "dc0" #skip_intervals 0 #graph_cutoff 1024 #promiscuous true #output_cdf false #recover_cdf false #filter "ip" #graph true =STOP CONFIG= Thanks for your help. Please note, this is a short config file, but I no

Re: Devices not being built

2004-07-07 Thread Nathan Kinkade
On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 05:44:02AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi > > I've built a FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE #5 kernel. I have a linksys WMP 11 wireless > card. > I've configured and built the kernel with the followings devices > device wlan# 802.11 support > device

bypass no new partitions protection ?

2004-07-07 Thread Hugo Silva
Hi all In one of my servers I left a 80GB disk unpartitioned to later partitition it according to my needs, only to have sysinstall always complain it couldn't write to ad1. I've googled a bit and it seems its related to some kind of protection that won't allow the system to create any new partiti

Re: tcpdump (/dev/bpf* permission) in FreeBSD-current

2004-07-07 Thread Lowell Gilbert
Patrick Dung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Only /dev/bpf0 is there at boot time > But when I run tcpdump, it automatically create > /dev/bpf1 (I have multiple NIC). > Running devfs at boot time cannot set the /dev/bpf1, > which is not present. Running devfs(8) at boot time will set rules that wil

Re: tcpdump (/dev/bpf* permission) in FreeBSD-current

2004-07-07 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Jul 07), Patrick Dung said: > Only /dev/bpf0 is there at boot time > But when I run tcpdump, it automatically create > /dev/bpf1 (I have multiple NIC). > Running devfs at boot time cannot set the /dev/bpf1, > which is not present. Devfs rules use wildcard matches: path pat

Re: Sendmail hand upon boot and restart

2004-07-07 Thread Steve Bertrand
> > > After a year I'm finally upgrading DNS servers, and having > a bad time getting sendmail and dhcp to work. I may finally > have dhcp woking on ns1.thought.org. ping works and my > /var/log/maillog is filling up. But on tao.thought.org, > sendmail refuses to start. Can anybody help me ith

RE: BandwidthD syntax error?

2004-07-07 Thread Michael Clark
If you want to post your configuration file Ill take a look at it. Michael Clark Nemschoff Chairs Inc mclark at nemschoff dot com CompTIA A+, Network+, Server+, MCP Voice: (920) 457 7726 x294 Fax: (920) 453 6594 -Original Message- From: Eric Crist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesd

Strange error while installing apache 2.0.50 on freebsd 5.2.1-RELEASE-p9

2004-07-07 Thread Alexander Liebau
hi, i got a strange problem with apache 2.0.50 on freebsd 5.2.1.. while installing it says: mkdir /usr/local/libexec/apache2 /usr/ports/www/apache2/work/httpd-2.0.50/srclib/apr/libtool --silent --mode= install cp mod_access.la /usr/local/libexec/apache2/ grep: /usr/local/libexec/apache2/mod_acces

Re: BandwidthD syntax error?

2004-07-07 Thread Bill Moran
"Eric Crist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hey all, > > I just installed bandwidthd, and I get the following error when I try to > run it from it's home directory: > > Monitoring subnet 63.228.14.240 with netmask 255.255.255.248 > grog# Opening dc0 > Opening dc0 > Opening dc0 > Opening dc0 > Synta

Re: tcpdump (/dev/bpf* permission) in FreeBSD-current

2004-07-07 Thread Patrick Dung
Only /dev/bpf0 is there at boot time But when I run tcpdump, it automatically create /dev/bpf1 (I have multiple NIC). Running devfs at boot time cannot set the /dev/bpf1, which is not present. --- Lowell Gilbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 內容:> Patrick Dung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > There is no w

BandwidthD syntax error?

2004-07-07 Thread Eric Crist
Hey all, I just installed bandwidthd, and I get the following error when I try to run it from it's home directory: Monitoring subnet 63.228.14.240 with netmask 255.255.255.248 grog# Opening dc0 Opening dc0 Opening dc0 Opening dc0 Syntax Error "parse error" on line 40 Syntax Error "parse error" on

Re: 4.10 Installation/configuration

2004-07-07 Thread Matthew Seaman
On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 06:36:51AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I am in the process of installing 4.10 FreeBSD and have got as far as the ' > basic ' insatllation and am now starting post-installation configuration. I > find, however, that I appear to have the wrong default keyboard configu

4.10 Installation/configuration

2004-07-07 Thread AlbrtNew
Hi I am in the process of installing 4.10 FreeBSD and have got as far as the ' basic ' insatllation and am now starting post-installation configuration. I find, however, that I appear to have the wrong default keyboard configuration for my Region [UK] and I was wondering if anybody can put me s

Can't install kdebase

2004-07-07 Thread Jason Oakley
Resend as my previous emails didn't seem to arrive. I can't get kdebase to install. This is a new FreeBSD build from Mini ISO. kde has not been installed on here before. I first installed evolution. Now KDE. I've tried building from ports. I've deleted the "work/" directory and tried again. I've d

Freebsd 4.10 and Oracle-Client 9

2004-07-07 Thread Volker Lieder
Hello List, i need help on installing an oracle-client on my freebsd-box. I have to connect with the client to an external Server. In the ports is only the version7. Perhaps anyone has tried such an installation or can tell me where to get a client and a way or an alternative solution. Greets, Volk

IMAP-UW problems

2004-07-07 Thread Jorn Argelo
Hi guys, I've compiled IMAP-UW from the ports-tree with the following option: WITH_SSL_AND_PLAINTEXT I can telnet to port 993, internal and external, and the imapd is being invoked by inetd. However, I still can't login. My machine throws out this kernel message: Jul 7 10:48:34 www imapd[6778

Re: Anybody know how to run Skype for Linux on FreeBSD

2004-07-07 Thread Murray Taylor
On Wed, 2004-07-07 at 12:59, Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P. wrote: > Hasse wrote: > > >On Wednesday 07 July 2004 02.05, Adam Smith wrote: > > > > > >>On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 02:02:42AM +0200, Hasse said: > >> > >> > >>>Thx Adam, I'll certainly will do that. > >>>Shame on ME , > >>>and my fait