OK, Its all figured out now..
I didnt catch Kris's unix2dos.. I thought it was dos2unix. Then I found
the port unix2dos, which builds BOTH a dos2unix, and a unix2dos. I prefer
full explainations like that.. :)
Thanks to all that replied.
C.
On Sat, 28 Dec 2002, paul beard wrote:
>
> On Satur
On Sat, 28 Dec 2002 22:54:53 -0800 (PST), Chris P wrote:
>
>Hello,
> Anyone know of any similar commands that will strip out the DOS
>control-M's that show up in files? dos2unix in solaris... rmcr in SCO..
>how about FreeBSD?
there is a dos2unix in the ports...
cd /usr/ports
make search key="d
On Saturday, Dec 28, 2002, at 10:54PM, Chris P <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>Hello,
> Anyone know of any similar commands that will strip out the DOS
>control-M's that show up in files? dos2unix in solaris... rmcr in SCO..
>how about FreeBSD?
>
[/usr/ports]:: make search key=unix2dos | egrep
the port for unix2dos goes both ways
--mat
On Sun, 2002-12-29 at 01:26, Chris P wrote:
> for entire files. I didnt see any ports for dos2unix.. Not real familiar
> with tr..
>
> C.
>
>
> On Sat, 28 Dec 2002, Kris Kennaway wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Dec 28, 2002 at 10:54:53PM -0800, Chris P wrote:
Rick Hamell writes:
> > I'm not sure where I'm going wrong, but the system doesn't seem to
> > detect the card. I've tried scanpci, pcitweak, and pciconf to see if
> > the card shows up there (I'm not sure if those utilities actually scan
> > the PCI bus, or just report what's been scanned bef
Probably you have your cd-rom drive plugged into your soundcard, which
means that its bypassing your operating system and sending the output
directly through the sound card. try running '#esd -trust -unix' and
see if your speakers are outputting sound. maybe its a problem with the
output plugin (
On Sat, Dec 28, 2002 at 11:26:26PM -0800, Chris P wrote:
> for entire files. I didnt see any ports for dos2unix.. Not real familiar
> with tr..
I already you answered your question.
Kris
msg13546/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
for entire files. I didnt see any ports for dos2unix.. Not real familiar
with tr..
C.
On Sat, 28 Dec 2002, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 28, 2002 at 10:54:53PM -0800, Chris P wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> > Anyone know of any similar commands that will strip out the DOS
> > control-M's that s
I compiled device pcm in my kernel. my music cds play
perfect but mp3s wont play at all in xmms. i upgraded
from 4.6.2 to 4.7 last night and the mp3s played fine
in 4.6.2. Is there something I need to do in 4.7 that
I don't know about? I checked the handbook but
nothing. please Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Sat, Dec 28, 2002 at 10:54:53PM -0800, Chris P wrote:
>
> Hello,
> Anyone know of any similar commands that will strip out the DOS
> control-M's that show up in files? dos2unix in solaris... rmcr in SCO..
> how about FreeBSD?
The unix2dos port or a trivial 1-line tr command :)
Kris
msg1
Hello,
Anyone know of any similar commands that will strip out the DOS
control-M's that show up in files? dos2unix in solaris... rmcr in SCO..
how about FreeBSD?
Thanks..
C.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
> I'm not sure where I'm going wrong, but the system doesn't seem to
> detect the card. I've tried scanpci, pcitweak, and pciconf to see if
> the card shows up there (I'm not sure if those utilities actually scan
> the PCI bus, or just report what's been scanned before, but...) and
> still, it's
Today I purchased a Belkin 5 port USB PCI card, which claims to be
OHCI compliant, and backwards-compatible to USB 1.1 -- so it should
work with FreeBSD, right?.
I'm not sure where I'm going wrong, but the system doesn't seem to
detect the card. I've tried scanpci, pcitweak, and pciconf to see if
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
>> (12.28.2002 @ 2157 PST): Derision said, in 0.4K: <<
> What is the correct line in the kernel config for
> making halt -p work?
>
> Mine is currently
> deviceapm0
>
> (FreeBSD 4.7)
>> end of "APM" from Derision <<
Make sure you al
What is the correct line in the kernel config for
making halt -p work?
Mine is currently
device apm0
(FreeBSD 4.7)
Regards,
Greg Smith
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.
On Sun, Dec 29, 2002 at 02:02:01AM +0100, Daimonion wrote:
>
> When openssl in the basesystem and in ports will be updated? Quite a
> long time has passed since the openssl 0.9.6h was released (5.12.02).
After 5.0-RELEASE; FreeBSD-current and the ports collection are in code freeze.
Kris
msg1
On Sat, Dec 28, 2002 at 02:49:34PM -0500, Murat Bicer wrote:
> Lets say I have 2 freebsd instances installed on a box.
>
> partition 1 contains one system, and partition 2 contains another freebsd
> system.
>
> Using freebsd boot loader, you need to press F1, F2 etc to select the
> partition to b
On Sat, Dec 28, 2002 at 10:34:28PM -0500, Fuzzy wrote:
>
> On Sun, 29 Dec 2002, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
>
> > On Saturday, 28 December 2002 at 22:32:30 +, lewiz wrote:
> > No, this means that your DNS is flaky. As somebody observed, this is
> > a transient error. Your MTA retries about e
Geez, Is this *still* going on?
Why are you still cc'ing the list
Regards,
Stacey
On Sun, 2002-12-29 at 03:11, Harry Tabak wrote:
> Chuck Swiger wrote:
>
> > If one sends a message that could not be delivered, an error report
> > (called a DSN) is returned, describing the problem. People
Chuck Swiger wrote:
If one sends a message that could not be delivered, an error report
(called a DSN) is returned, describing the problem. People sending
legitimate email know who they've sent mail to, right? And when they
get DSN's, as you most probably did, you talk to your ISP, etc, et
Dear/Beste Patrick,
Saturday, December 28, 2002, 4:37:26 PM, you wrote:
> Hello all,
> What do you use for a backup solution for your freebsd server?
> I've got a server running mail and web that I would like to back up
> on a regular basis. Some of the ideas ive heard:
> o B
Brett Glass wrote:
At 09:16 AM 12/28/2002, Harry Tabak wrote:
I can't really stop the Spambouncer people from shouting "fire" from their own website -- freedom of speech and all that. But should FreeBSD act as an amplifier.
I personally believe that spam is a serious security issue (see
my
On Saturday, December 28, 2002, at 04:22 PM, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
No, this means that your DNS is flaky. As somebody observed, this is
a transient error. Your MTA retries about every 30 minutes for about
5 days, and sooner or later the reverse lookup succeeds, and your mail
is delivere
On Sat, 28 Dec 2002, lewiz wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 28, 2002 at 10:22:56PM +, lewiz wrote:
> > pccard_ifconfig but I could be wrong. It works so I'm leaving it there.
> > I ran the DOS-based 3Com configuation utility. I downloaded it from the
> > Internet (mail me if you can't find it and I'll e
> i prefer some way to insure that users cannot cd to other directory's
> outside of there homedir.
>
i found the solution, i created a /etc/ftpchroot file and added the
usergroup.
Greetings,
Marcel
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body
When openssl in the basesystem and in ports will be updated? Quite a
long time has passed since the openssl 0.9.6h was released (5.12.02).
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
On Saturday, 28 December 2002 at 22:32:30 +, lewiz wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 28, 2002 at 08:53:15AM -0500, Harry Tabak wrote:
>> Mail sent from my main server, gatehouse.quadtelecom.com (66.45.116.138)
>> gets rejected.
>> _450_Client_host_rejected:_cannot_find_your_hostname,_[66.45.116.138]
>
> I
On Saturday, 28 December 2002 at 11:27:53 -0600, Len Conrad wrote:
>
>> Easier said than done. I've been assigned 66.45.116.136/29 by the ISP.
>
> .136 is not a power of 2 which is required for classless reverse
> delegation.
They don't need to be powers of 2.
> It should be .132/29 or .140/29
Hi all,
I just found a little problem with my security and i hope you guys (and
girls) can help me out.
I'm running an apache webserver (1.3.27) and the default ftpd (from the
inetd).
To use the mod_userdir i need to give all dirs and files in
/home//www 705 (rwx---r-x) and /home/ 701 (rwx-x
Hi all. I used to have an email that came from this list detailing which
UPS program to use for freebsd, but for some reason I have lost it. I
currently have an APC 650 Pro UPS attached to Com1 on one of my machines
and I need to set it up so that it will monitor the machine and shut it
down
* Anish Mistry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-12-28 14:11]:
> On Saturday 28 December 2002 02:44 pm, Dale Morris wrote:
> > I'm in the process of setting up 4.7 after being away from FreeBSD for a
> > while. I'm having trouble with kmix
> try running kmix from an xterm window and see what error message(
On Sat, Dec 28, 2002 at 08:53:15AM -0500, Harry Tabak wrote:
> Mail sent from my main server, gatehouse.quadtelecom.com (66.45.116.138)
> gets rejected.
> _450_Client_host_rejected:_cannot_find_your_hostname,_[66.45.116.138]
I'm getting this all the time too. It seems that after a while my mai
On Sat, Dec 28, 2002 at 10:22:56PM +, lewiz wrote:
> pccard_ifconfig but I could be wrong. It works so I'm leaving it there.
> I ran the DOS-based 3Com configuation utility. I downloaded it from the
> Internet (mail me if you can't find it and I'll email it to you). This
On second thoughts.
On Sat, Dec 28, 2002 at 10:21:55PM +0100, Marcel Stangenberger wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Dec 2002, lewiz wrote:
>
> > I was playing around with some options on a 4.4-RELEASE disc1 ISO I'd
> > burnt. I have now got it working. I'm just about to test if it'll work
> > on 5.0-DP2. A guy on eu.openprojec
On Sat, Dec 28, 2002 at 02:33:10PM -0500, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
> lewiz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I've just got a 3C589 PCCARD NIC going. However, I'm using the BNC
> > (10Base2) connector so I need to specify ``media 10base2/BNC'' in
> > rc.conf. However, if I do this DHCP doesn't see
CAN WE GET THIS THREAD KILLED NOW ???
It has nothing to do with FreeBSD.
Please shut up and move this thread somewhere else!
Poul-Henning
In message <1041114029.3577.60.camel@pitbull>, Shawn Duffy writes:
>
>--=-hYgamAC/8Ubo1V9A/Ysq
>Content-Type: text/plain
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted
I would say a better solution that blocks would be header/body based
phrase and word matching on a weighting system like spamassassin
provides. The False positive rates for such a system are MUCH lower
than what you could ever hope for with a blacklist. Also regarding
Inflow. They have been warned
On Sat, 28 Dec 2002, Chris Orr wrote:
> *doesnt want to get laws very involved with the internet*
>
better yet, who's laws should be followed then? should the world follow
the american laws like loyal puppies or should we follow another countries
laws? perhaps the law of the country of the sendin
Here is the difference...
The US Postal Service is a government agency "owned by the people",
hence, "interfering" with regular mail is bad..
email runs over corporate networks and uses private resources, none
"owned" by the "people"... hence a corporation, ISP, can certainly
decide what it allo
On Saturday 28 December 2002 02:44 pm, Dale Morris wrote:
> I'm in the process of setting up 4.7 after being away from FreeBSD for a
> while. I'm having trouble with kmix
>
> I have sound working, cd's play, realplayer works but when I
> select kmixer from the panel, the waiting cursor comes up an
*doesnt want to get laws very involved with the internet*
On Sat, 28 Dec 2002, Duncan Patton a Campbell wrote:
> No. The automated systems to filtre spam and virii better
> be *really* careful about what they block.
>
> If you block or subvert discrete communications between humans then
> you ar
No. The automated systems to filtre spam and virii better
be *really* careful about what they block.
If you block or subvert discrete communications between humans then
you are asking for real trouble. That's all.
Dhu
On 28 Dec 2002 17:00:54 -0500
Shawn Duffy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
So we should let the govt open all unopened mail to make sure nothing is
illegal in it? and then leave it up to them to determine if it was
intentional?
please...
On Sat, 2002-12-28 at 16:51, Duncan Patton a Campbell wrote:
> The law would have to consider intention of the sender:
>
> Virii are
Harry Tabak wrote:
[This is a resend. Ironically, the orignal was blocked by FreeBSD's spam
filter, I've had to send this from another account]
I'm sorry to hear that you've had problems with spam filters; like most things
(and most people), they aren't perfect and they sometimes make mistakes.
The law would have to consider intention of the sender:
Virii are (generally) not intended by the sender, except
for the original author. If I didn't intend to send the
virus, there is no constraint on you scanning and chopping
it. As for porn, if you are a minor, then by sending it
to you I hav
So theoretically scanning email attatchments for viruses is illeagal too?
and the same goes for filtering out porn?
-chris
On Sat, 28 Dec 2002, Duncan Patton a Campbell wrote:
> Seems to me that this is an invitation to government
> regulation -- interfering with the mail is a criminal
> offense
I _really_ fail to see what this has to do with FreeBSD.
Can you please move this to a more appropriate forum ? I'm sure
there are lists and groups out there where the black-listing
crew communicates.
Thankyou!
Poul-Henning
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Duncan Patton a Campb
ell writes:
>--
On Sat, 28 Dec 2002 14:11:50 -0800 (PST)
Rick Hamell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Seems to me that this is an invitation to government
> > regulation -- interfering with the mail is a criminal
> > offense for good reason.
>
> Email is not regulated by the government.
>
> Rick
On Thu, 26 Dec 2002, lewiz wrote:
> I was playing around with some options on a 4.4-RELEASE disc1 ISO I'd
> burnt. I have now got it working. I'm just about to test if it'll work
> on 5.0-DP2. A guy on eu.openprojects.net in #freebsd told me to disable
> all unrequired devices in visual config.
(please tell me this is just a dream, and this thread really isn't
happening and I am not participating...)
++ 28/12/02 08:45 -0500 - Harry Tabak:
| I am not sure which list is best for this issue, hence the cross
| posting. I believe spam and anti-spam measures are security issues --
The
On Sat, 28 Dec 2002, Bosko Milekic wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 28, 2002 at 02:00:12PM -0700, Brett Glass wrote:
> > I personally believe that spam is a serious security issue (see
> > my paper at http://www.brettglass.com/spam/). However, be warned
> > that this list's Supreme Moderator may declare your
Abe wrote:
Are you sure that the 66.45.0.0/17 block is from sb-blockdomains.rc file?
Nevermind. I found the Inflow entry in sb-blockdomains.rc file. :)
Regards,
Abe Ro
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
On Sat, Dec 28, 2002 at 02:00:12PM -0700, Brett Glass wrote:
> I personally believe that spam is a serious security issue (see
> my paper at http://www.brettglass.com/spam/). However, be warned
> that this list's Supreme Moderator may declare your posting to
> be "off-topic," because it doesn't re
> Seems to me that this is an invitation to government
> regulation -- interfering with the mail is a criminal
> offense for good reason.
Email is not regulated by the government.
Rick
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the
On Sat, 28 Dec 2002, [ISO-8859-1] Mikko Työläjärvi wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Dec 2002, Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
>
> > Hey folks,
> >
> > I'm noticing some odd behaviour with the linux compatability
> > recently. I have this small gnome app called gnome-run. It links against
> > a number of gnome l
At 09:16 AM 12/28/2002, Harry Tabak wrote:
>I can't really stop the Spambouncer people from shouting "fire" from their own
>website -- freedom of speech and all that. But should FreeBSD act as an amplifier.
I personally believe that spam is a serious security issue (see
my paper at http://www.
Are you sure that the 66.45.0.0/17 block is from sb-blockdomains.rc file?
My guess is that it is from a listing on Five-Ten-SG blacklist, check out:
http://www.five-ten-sg.com/blackhole.php?ip=66.45.0.0
SpamBouncer supports a variety of blacklists including the Five-Ten-SG
blacklist, though sup
Joe (and the list),
Your suggestion fixed my problem.
(I'm not sure if my first reply made it. Sorry if you received
duplicate responses.)
Cheers...
Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
On Thu, 2002-12-26 at 22:39, Tom Parquette wrote:
Please CC me on any replies. Thanks...
This is a 4.7-STABLE system
Why is it? If you send me a letter, I have every right to refuse it, do
I not? If a company blocks too much, they will lose customers, and
eventually either will have to lighten up or go out of business...
shawn
On Sat, 2002-12-28 at 15:49, Duncan Patton a Campbell wrote:
> Seems to me that this
Here is _all_ of the lists that spam bnc supports. One of them will have
your ip range on it im sure.
http://www.spambouncer.org/#BlacklistSupport
I think spamBNC is GPL'ed software. You use it at your own risk. Dont
quote me on that one though. :)
-chris
On Sat, 28 Dec 2002, Duncan Patton a Cam
Seems to me that this is an invitation to government
regulation -- interfering with the mail is a criminal
offense for good reason.
Dhu
On 28 Dec 2002 15:46:10 -0500
Shawn Duffy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The lists are usually kept on the websites of whatever particular
> organizations are do
How do you find if you are on the list? And who has the list?
Can they be sued?
Thanks,
Duncan (Dhu) Campbell
On Sat, 28 Dec 2002 08:45:23 -0500
Harry Tabak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [This is a resend. Ironically, the orignal was blocked by FreeBSD's spam
> filter, I've had to send this
On Sat, 28 Dec 2002, Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
> Hey folks,
>
> I'm noticing some odd behaviour with the linux compatability
> recently. I have this small gnome app called gnome-run. It links against
> a number of gnome libraries that I've copied from my linux partition over
> to /compat/lin
At 06:55 PM 12.28.2002 +, Matthew Seaman wrote:
>On Sat, Dec 28, 2002 at 11:09:12AM -0600, Jack L. Stone wrote:
>> I've looked for a good set of working examples of packeting forwarding
>> using ipfw, but no luck yet. I'm wondering if the following rule would work
>> for sending packets receive
On Sat, 2002-12-28 at 18:51, Gerard Samuel wrote:
> Well after almost 24 hours later, here is what happened...
> Shortly after your last post, the situation got worse. I tried banging
> the switch with a screwdriver, and that was it.
> No more switch. The link light kept flashing, so I knew it w
> Is there a way to allow passive *outgoing* ftp via
> IPFILTER.
> The docs I read didn't make it clear if the IPFILTER's
> proxy is trying to proxy a ftp server behind a firewall
> or an ftp client behind a firewall.
Looks like you didn't find the right docs :-)
Answers to all your questions c
Lets say I have 2 freebsd instances installed on a box.
partition 1 contains one system, and partition 2 contains another freebsd
system.
Using freebsd boot loader, you need to press F1, F2 etc to select the
partition to boot from.
Say, I am on the system on partition one and I want to boot into
Hey folks,
I'm noticing some odd behaviour with the linux compatability
recently. I have this small gnome app called gnome-run. It links against
a number of gnome libraries that I've copied from my linux partition over
to /compat/linux and put in the appropriate directories.
Th
I'm in the process of setting up 4.7 after being away from FreeBSD for a
while. I'm having trouble with kmix
I have sound working, cd's play, realplayer works but when I
select kmixer from the panel, the waiting cursor comes up and then
nothing happens. I've tried changing permissions to 666 on /d
I am having some strange problems with detection of my ata hard drive, first here is
my system config.
Asus A7V8X, AMD 2000 512mb DDR400 ram, Geforce4 Ti4200 video, Adaptec 29160, Seagate
18gig LVD,
WD31600 HDD on primary, Lite-on cd-rw secondary master, Memorex cd-rom secondary slave.
Sometim
lewiz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've just got a 3C589 PCCARD NIC going. However, I'm using the BNC
> (10Base2) connector so I need to specify ``media 10base2/BNC'' in
> rc.conf. However, if I do this DHCP doesn't seem to work. Is there any
> way that I can combine media 10base2/BNC and DH
Someone, quite probably Harry Tabak, once wrote:
>> From: Chuck Rock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> There's not much you can do but what you already are doing. Complain.
>>
>> You complain to the people using the software, and if they can't
>> configure it, they will probably stop using it if they care.
>
Hi,
I have an IPFILTER firewall that, ideally, should not
allow any arbitrary outgoing connections. So right
now, I only allow 25, 80 and 21. The machine itself
is behind one more firewall (at least temporarily)
so that I can't do active ftp even if the IPFILTER
does any kind of proxying.
Is ther
On Sat, Dec 28, 2002 at 11:09:12AM -0600, Jack L. Stone wrote:
> I've looked for a good set of working examples of packeting forwarding
> using ipfw, but no luck yet. I'm wondering if the following rule would work
> for sending packets received on the gateway to a machine on the internal
> network
Well after almost 24 hours later, here is what happened...
Shortly after your last post, the situation got worse. I tried banging
the switch with a screwdriver, and that was it.
No more switch. The link light kept flashing, so I knew it was pretty
much dead.
Just so happens, that its a Friday e
>_450_Client_host_rejected:_cannot_find_your_hostname,_[66.45.116.138]
>
Your mail server is identifying itself as [66.45.116.138] instead of a
host with (valid) forward DNS records (hosts that do this are blocked
as a -- very effective -- anti-spam measure). Fix your mail server to
identif
Today Cliff Sarginson wrote:
> Hello,
> This is my festive season question.
> I was having some problems with my SMTP mail connection to my ISP.
> So I tcpdump'ed the ethernet ADSL connection.
> I think I know what most of it means, but can anyone tell me what
> the following messages, every 2 sec
On Sat, 28 Dec 2002 10:15:21 +0700, dodi agusri wrote:
>I use USER PPP to connect to internet . what is the
>command to display the current
>Speed of my modem ?
>Thank fo reply.
cat /var/log/ppp.log | grep CONNECT
and look at the last one
---
doug reynolds | the maverick | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Today Harry Tabak wrote:
> Mail sent from my main server, gatehouse.quadtelecom.com (66.45.116.138)
> gets rejected.
>_450_Client_host_rejected:_cannot_find_your_hostname,_[66.45.116.138]
If 450 is some error code, then it's only a _temporary_ error/failure
(RFC 1893). Maybe the DNS servers
phpbb2 :)
On Sat, 28 Dec 2002, Dr. Richard E. Hawkins wrote:
> After using the custom software provided here at Penn State, and, uhm,
> finding it lacking ("Please restore from backup." "You'll have to tell
> us when it failed" "?!?!?!"), I need to find some simple, presumably
> apache-based, we
On Fri, 27 Dec 2002 12:02:52 +, Daniel Bye wrote:
>On Fri, Dec 27, 2002 at 03:18:41PM +0400, Fawaz wrote:
>> Hello everyone,
>>
>> We are a small company, and we have a POP3 Email server that is running by
>> iPlanet. I need to to build a web interface so I can check the email by a
>> browser
On Thursday, December 26, 2002, at 06:01 PM, Keith Spencer wrote:
What does your /var/log/qmail/current file say?
$tail -f /var/log/qmail/current | tai64nlocal
Brian...I dont have such a /var/log/qmail/current
beast!
:(
Look in your /var/qmail directory for a subdirectory called
"s
Easier said than done. I've been assigned 66.45.116.136/29 by the ISP.
.136 is not a power of 2 which is required for classless reverse
delegation. It should be .132/29 or .140/29
I control DNS for quadtelecom.com, but I don't control the reverse
lookup. I'd like to know the exact algorith
On Sat, Dec 28, 2002 at 08:53:15AM -0500, Harry Tabak wrote:
> Mail sent from my main server, gatehouse.quadtelecom.com (66.45.116.138)
> gets rejected.
>_450_Client_host_rejected:_cannot_find_your_hostname,_[66.45.116.138]
>
> What are the rules for sending mail! I'm not a spammer -- I'
Hey,
I've been trying to get X running on a laptop with a Silicon Motion
SM710 LynxEM.
When I startx I get a brief flash on the screen (two vertical lines)
but these soon disappear and I am unable to do anything (even
CTRL+ALT+F1) other than SSH in and kill -9 X.
pciconf shows it as: none1@p
In some mail from Allan Jude, sie said:
>
> This is not all that surprising
> The behavior you are talking about, blocking entire isp's and blocks of
> ips, is the same as the other service you mentioned earlier, SPEWS.
>
> SPEWS has blocked 2 entire c-classes at my isp, preventing my company
> f
I've looked for a good set of working examples of packeting forwarding
using ipfw, but no luck yet. I'm wondering if the following rule would work
for sending packets received on the gateway to a machine on the internal
network (LAN)...???
# ipfw add fwd tcp from 65.xxx.zzz.yyy to 192.168.0.5
An
Does anyone have any URLs that explain the order in which the following
occur:
1. an outbound packet is NATed, encapsulated by ESP, and compared to an
ipfw ruleset
2. the same as above, except for an inbound packet
3. the same as both above, except for an ipf ruleset
I remember coming acros
On Sat, 2002-12-28 at 16:26, Cliff Sarginson wrote:
> Hello,
> This is my festive season question.
> I was having some problems with my SMTP mail connection to my ISP.
> So I tcpdump'ed the ethernet ADSL connection.
> I think I know what most of it means, but can anyone tell me what
> the following
This is not all that surprising
The behavior you are talking about, blocking entire isp's and blocks of
ips, is the same as the other service you mentioned earlier, SPEWS.
SPEWS has blocked 2 entire c-classes at my isp, preventing my company
from sending mail to many large email sites, like mail.c
my business is main on biological and genetic field ,not computer or internet,
internet business is just for my interest only..
I main live on social assistance, so i don't care if i have no money or not , i only
busy about my research on biological and chemical study ,
i hope before i die , anyo
Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2002 14:50:54 +0100
From: rocky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: rocky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Harry Tabak wrote:
> Mail sent from my main server, gatehouse.quadtelecom.com
> (66.45.116.138) gets rejected.
> _450_Client_host_reject
Hello,
This is my festive season question.
I was having some problems with my SMTP mail connection to my ISP.
So I tcpdump'ed the ethernet ADSL connection.
I think I know what most of it means, but can anyone tell me what
the following messages, every 2 seconds mean ?
It is not a problem, I just wo
Subject: Re: Bystander shot by a spam filter.
Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2002 09:19:32 -0600 (CST)
From: Chuck Rock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Harry Tabak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
There's not much you can do but what you already are doing. Complain.
You complain to the p
From: Harry Tabak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
This is so crazy I had to respond.
My tiny x/29 block is sub-allocated from my DSL provider's x/23 block.
The DSL provider's block is a sub-allocation from Inflow.com's
66.45.0.0/17 block. Spambouncer doesn't like Inflow. While they have a
right to the
After using the custom software provided here at Penn State, and, uhm,
finding it lacking ("Please restore from backup." "You'll have to tell
us when it failed" "?!?!?!"), I need to find some simple, presumably
apache-based, web software to run on my workstation.
There will not be more than 70 stu
There's not much you can do but what you already are doing. Complain.
You complain to the people using the software, and if they can't
configure it, they will probably stop using it if they care.
You complain to the people that actually wrote the software. Usually found
in the source code and suc
On Sat, 28 Dec 2002 05:54:50 -0800
Adam Weinberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
> I use courier-imapd with SquirrelMail, and it rocks. It doesn't knock
> my socks off when it's using really large directories, though. I save
> every porn spam I get (dunno why... I get about 50/day), and it takes
On Sat, 28 Dec 2002, Harry Tabak wrote:
> I recently discovered, and quite by accident, that a FreeBSD ported
> package -- spambnc (aka Spambouncer or SB) -- was blocking mail from
> me to an unknown number of businesses and individuals on the
> internet.
More precisely, people who have chosen to
WOULD YOU LIKE TO HAVE YOUR MESSAGE SEEN BY OVER
15.1 MILLION TARGETED PROSPECTS DAILY?
Below contains all the information you will ever need to market your product or
service on the Internet.
If you have a product, service, or message that you would like to get out
to Thousands, Hundreds of T
1 - 100 of 110 matches
Mail list logo
