Maintainer timeout: devel/py-pluggy bug 235338

2019-03-01 Thread John W. O'Brien
Hello FreeBSD Python, I believe we have exceeded the two week maintainer timeout on bug 235338 [0]. A tested patch has been ready to commit since 2019-01-31T01:15:09Z. Are there any committers within earshot able and willing to take this bug? [0] devel/py-pluggy: Update to 0.7.1 https://bugs

[Bug 235728] net-mgmt/py-pysnmp: Upgrade to 4.4.9

2019-03-01 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235728 Craig Leres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||le...@freebsd.org Status

[Bug 235728] net-mgmt/py-pysnmp: Upgrade to 4.4.9

2019-03-01 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235728 --- Comment #3 from commit-h...@freebsd.org --- A commit references this bug: Author: leres Date: Fri Mar 1 17:23:17 UTC 2019 New revision: 494306 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/494306 Log: Update RUN_DEPENDS as per PR

[Bug 235728] net-mgmt/py-pysnmp: Upgrade to 4.4.9

2019-03-01 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235728 Craig Leres changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|In Progress

[Bug 235772] net-mgmt/py-pysnmp-apps: Rename to snmpclitools and upgrade to 0.6.1

2019-03-01 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235772 Bug 235772 depends on bug 235728, which changed state. Bug 235728 Summary: net-mgmt/py-pysnmp: Upgrade to 4.4.9 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235728 What|Removed |Added

[Bug 235728] net-mgmt/py-pysnmp: Upgrade to 4.4.9

2019-03-01 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235728 --- Comment #4 from John W. O'Brien --- (In reply to Craig Leres from comment #2) I was not party to the offline discussion. Why was this bug closed without applying the patch I submitted that was approved by the maintainer? -- You are re

[Bug 235728] net-mgmt/py-pysnmp: Upgrade to 4.4.9

2019-03-01 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235728 --- Comment #5 from Craig Leres --- (In reply to John W. O'Brien from comment #4) The offline discussion was about me taking the PR and committing the patch. I believe r235728 implements your requested change (with the addition of PORTREVI