https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219890
Bernhard Froehlich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|Open|In Progress
--- Comment #5 fr
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219890
--- Comment #6 from commit-h...@freebsd.org ---
A commit references this bug:
Author: decke
Date: Mon Jun 12 08:37:05 UTC 2017
New revision: 443416
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/443416
Log:
Fix dependency issue with mis
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219890
--- Comment #7 from Kubilay Kocak ---
Note that the quarterly version is still affected.
One of the reason its (highly) preferable to separate fixes from version
updates is that so those fixes can be merged to the quarterly branch where
th
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219890
--- Comment #8 from nimr...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Kubilay Kocak from comment #7)
To level set, I've been using the quarterly ports tree.
I didn't think about looking at upstream, but it sounds like this is the way to
go. It's been b
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219890
Bernhard Froehlich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|In Progress |Closed
Resolution|---
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219890
--- Comment #10 from nimr...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Bernhard Froehlich from comment #9)
Totally understood.
I was just pointing out that I had been using the quarterly branch and hadn't
thought to look at the upstream code and that sin
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219890
Kubilay Kocak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|r...@freebsd.org|ports-sect...@freebsd.org
Please note the Python 2.7 port is NOT broken with the openssl-devel
port. One does need to compile the openssl-devel port with NEXTPROTONEG
option enabled, as there's a bug in how Python 2.7.13 determines if
that's enabled or not. Or one could patch Modules/_ssl.c to detect it
properly. I.e