https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216208
John W. O'Brien changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #179022|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197072
John W. O'Brien changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||j...@saltant.com
--- Comment #3
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214295
John W. O'Brien changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pyt...@freebsd.org
--
You are r
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216576
Bug ID: 216576
Summary: [patch] sysutils/py-iocage: Port is unsupported under
python3
Product: Ports & Packages
Version: Latest
Hardware: Any
OS: Any
Hello FreeBSD Python,
One of the most common problems I encounter with python3
interoperability is when the concurrent option is needed and can be
trivially enabled. There is a growing list of bugs where this, on a
individual port basis, has been fixed ([0], [1]), is in progress ([2],
[3]), or is
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216579
Bug ID: 216579
Summary: [patch] devel/py-boto: Enable concurrent installs
Product: Ports & Packages
Version: Latest
Hardware: Any
OS: Any
Status: New
On 29 January 2017 at 11:08, John W. O'Brien wrote:
> Hello FreeBSD Python,
> On the
> other hand, there are lots of ports for which concurrent is a no-op, and
> lots more that don't support python3 at all meaning that concurrent has
> little to no chance to cause harm.
>
> What I propose is to en
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216579
Ruslan Makhmatkhanov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|New |Open
--- Comment #1 from Ru
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216580
Bug ID: 216580
Summary: [PATCH] devel/py-tables: Enable concurrent installs
Product: Ports & Packages
Version: Latest
Hardware: Any
OS: Any
Status: New
On 1/29/17 14:08, John W. O'Brien wrote:
> There is a growing list of bugs [...] in my queue and perhaps others'
> to submit ([4]).
> [...]
> [4] devel/py-boto, devel/py-tables, devel/pep8, devel/flake8
It just goes to show how much dust my queue has accumulated. devel/pep8
is done [5].
Also, dev
On 1/29/17 14:22, Eitan Adler wrote:
> On 29 January 2017 at 11:08, John W. O'Brien wrote:
>> Hello FreeBSD Python,
>> On the
>> other hand, there are lots of ports for which concurrent is a no-op, and
>> lots more that don't support python3 at all meaning that concurrent has
>> little to no chanc
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216579
--- Comment #2 from John W. O'Brien ---
(In reply to Ruslan Makhmatkhanov from comment #1)
Should have said "scripts" because there are lots.
Without concurrent the plist for py27-boto (the default) includes, e.g.,
/usr/local/bin/asa
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216579
--- Comment #3 from Ruslan Makhmatkhanov ---
(In reply to John W. O'Brien from comment #2)
Ah, so you just need them to contain python version in scripts name?
What the point of that? Do you need to install py36-boto and py27-boto in
parall
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216579
--- Comment #4 from John W. O'Brien ---
(In reply to Ruslan Makhmatkhanov from comment #3)
Yes, that's the point of 'concurrent'.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
To view an individual PR, use:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=(Bug Id).
The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users,
which need special attention. These represent problem reports covering
all versions including experimental development code and ob
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216581
Bug ID: 216581
Summary: [PATCH] devel/py-pycodestyle: Enable concurrent
installs
Product: Ports & Packages
Version: Latest
Hardware: Any
OS: Any
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216582
John W. O'Brien changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||216581
Referenced Bugs:
https:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216582
Bug ID: 216582
Summary: [patch] devel/py-flake8: Enable concurrent installs
Product: Ports & Packages
Version: Latest
Hardware: Any
OS: Any
Status: New
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216581
John W. O'Brien changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||216582
Referenced Bugs:
https:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216583
Bug ID: 216583
Summary: [PATCH] devel/py-jmespath: Enable concurrent installs
Product: Ports & Packages
Version: Latest
Hardware: Any
OS: Any
Status: New
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216585
John W. O'Brien changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||j...@saltant.com
Depends
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216585
Bug ID: 216585
Summary: [PATCH] www/py-pelican: Concurrent install is
ineffective without PKGNAMEPREFIX
Product: Ports & Packages
Version: Latest
Hardware: Any
On Sun, Jan 29, 2017 at 02:08:00PM -0500, John W. O'Brien wrote:
> Hello FreeBSD Python,
>
> One of the most common problems I encounter with python3
> interoperability is when the concurrent option is needed and can be
> trivially enabled. There is a growing list of bugs where this, on a
> indivi
Thank you for your input.
On 1/29/17 19:50, Roland Smith wrote:
[...]
> There also seems to be a trend of separate py3-* ports. This is sometimes a
> much better solution than trying to make a single port support python 2 and 3.
If I am not mistaken, the purpose of the py3-* ports is mainly to
de
Hello all,
At some point between 2017-01-17T07:39:59-05:00
2017-01-23T10:48:15-05:00, some ports started failing to build under
python3.4 (not 3.5 or 3.6). The failure occurs during the poudriere
stage phase while processing the MANIFEST.in template. If the manifest
contains a graft statement that
On 01/29/17 14:08, John W. O'Brien wrote:
> Hello FreeBSD Python,
>
> One of the most common problems I encounter with python3
> interoperability is when the concurrent option is needed and can be
> trivially enabled. There is a growing list of bugs where this, on a
> individual port basis, has be
On 1/29/2017 9:40:15 PM, "John W. O'Brien" wrote:
On 1/29/17 14:22, Eitan Adler wrote:
On 29 January 2017 at 11:08, John W. O'Brien
wrote:
Hello FreeBSD Python,
On the
other hand, there are lots of ports for which concurrent is a no-op,
and
lots more that don't support python3 at all m
Dear port maintainer,
The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your
ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check
each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you
28 matches
Mail list logo
