On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 12:36:29PM +1100, Kubilay Kocak wrote:
> On 13/11/2015 6:26 AM, Vladimir Bogrecov wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm developing a little project on Python 3.5. The server's operating
> > system is FreeBSD 10.2. Today I decided to do a little test "just for fun"
> > and the resul
On 12 Nov 2015, at 19:35, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
>
> I'm adding Freebsd-virtualization to this thread as both problems point to
> some possible issue with FreeBSD as a guest. (although a bare metal
> comparison should likely be done as well).
>
> -Alfred
>
>> On 11/12/15 11:26 AM, Vladimir
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 09:01:57AM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 12:36:29PM +1100, Kubilay Kocak wrote:
> > On 13/11/2015 6:26 AM, Vladimir Bogrecov wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I'm developing a little project on Python 3.5. The server's operating
> > > system is Fr
> On 13 Nov 2015, at 08:08, Mark Blackman wrote:
>
>> On 12 Nov 2015, at 19:35, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
>>
>> I'm adding Freebsd-virtualization to this thread as both problems point to
>> some possible issue with FreeBSD as a guest. (although a bare metal
>> comparison should likely be don
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204519
Bug ID: 204519
Summary: Mk/Uses/python.mk: Set Python 3.5 as the default 3.x
version
Product: Ports & Packages
Version: Latest
Hardware: Any
OS: Any
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204519
Kubilay Kocak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||easy, needs-patch
Assign
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204519
--- Comment #2 from Mathieu Arnold ---
it should be given to portmgr for exp-run, why take it back ?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
freebsd-pytho
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204519
Kubilay Kocak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||exp-run?
--- Comment #3 from Kubil
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204519
--- Comment #4 from Kubilay Kocak ---
Also note, it's still within the Ports Framework component, and the change
technically doesn't require portmgr approval. But certainly an exp-run is
warranted for this kind of change
--
You are receiv
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204519
--- Comment #5 from Mathieu Arnold ---
(In reply to Kubilay Kocak from comment #3)
> I can request an exp-run whilst being 'current responsible' (assignee)
>
> Having said that, if you want to create a patch and take it for an exp-run,
> b
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204519
Antoine Brodin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD. |
|org
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204519
Kubilay Kocak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-qa
--- Comment #6 from Kubil
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204519
Kubilay Kocak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Mk/Uses/python.mk: Set |Mk/bsd.default-versions.mk:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204519
Andrew Berg changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aberg...@my.hennepintech.ed
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204519
--- Comment #8 from Kubilay Kocak ---
@Andrew, is this a change (better/worse/same) in behaviour from 3.4 being the
current 3.x default?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204519
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Berg ---
(In reply to Kubilay Kocak from comment #8)
It's the same. A port wants the py27-foo package because it needs 2.7, but the
py34-foo package was built instead because 3.4 was the default and foo supports
b
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204519
--- Comment #10 from Kubilay Kocak ---
So that would leave us in the net same position, except with 3.5 as the default
version (which is the upstream recommendation: use the latest point release of
a major version branch).
Any poudriere/pk
Vladimir ,
Please run truss(1) against the python code and paste a subset here. Maybe it
is doing many semaphore ops.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Nov 13, 2015, at 12:49 AM, Mark Blackman wrote:
>
> Vladimir
___
freebsd-python@freebsd.org mailing list
On 11/12/15 12:40 PM, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
Most likely its /dev/random or gettimeofday being slow which have nothing
to do with Python.
Urm... so like if FreeBSD's getpid was 100x slower than Linux's then
what exactly would it be?
If FreeBSD's implementation is needlessly precise (and
On 11/13/15 12:01 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
I'm kind of surprised given the number of pythonic people we have that
no one has had a look at how python perform on FreeBSD and how things
are implemented in the python VM to help them. Bapt
Did this recently in a few places however not in thi
Alfred Perlstein wrote this message on Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 11:35 -0800:
> I'm adding Freebsd-virtualization to this thread as both problems point
> to some possible issue with FreeBSD as a guest. (although a bare metal
> comparison should likely be done as well).
This could simply be a python
21 matches
Mail list logo
