On 3/2/18 9:03 PM, Kubilay Kocak wrote:
>
> users care, that software someone does is not in question.
^W---^
>
> ./koobs
>
___
freebsd-python@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-pyth
On 3/2/18 8:45 PM, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 02, 2018 at 07:57:51AM +, Kubilay Kocak wrote:
>> 1) Assuming what users care about is risky business.
>> 2) The 'app vs library' distinction is not sound here. It wasn't sound
>> for python package prefixing in the past either.
>> 3) The c
On 3/2/18 7:32 PM, Yuri wrote:
> On 03/01/18 23:57, Kubilay Kocak wrote:
>> 1) Assuming what users care about is risky business.
>
>
> Port has to provide to users functionality that they expect. If port is
> an app, executable provides this functionality. Executables based on
> different python
On Fri, Mar 02, 2018 at 07:57:51AM +, Kubilay Kocak wrote:
> 1) Assuming what users care about is risky business.
> 2) The 'app vs library' distinction is not sound here. It wasn't sound
> for python package prefixing in the past either.
> 3) The change introduces and increases inconsistency am
On 03/01/18 23:57, Kubilay Kocak wrote:
1) Assuming what users care about is risky business.
Port has to provide to users functionality that they expect. If port is
an app, executable provides this functionality. Executables based on
different python versions are expected to work the same wa
On 3/2/18 6:40 PM, Yuri wrote:
> If the port can only be used as an app, as opposed to library, multiple
> flavors aren't needed. All users care about is an executable. It doesn't
> matter what python version is used.
That's what sane^Wyou and I would think. :-)
On Fri, Mar 02, 2018 at 06:57:51PM
On 3/2/18 6:40 PM, Yuri wrote:
> On 03/01/18 23:23, Kubilay Kocak wrote:
>> This reason doesn't sound correct. Could you explain this further?
>
>
> If the port can only be used as an app, as opposed to library, multiple
> flavors aren't needed. All users care about is an executable. It doesn't
>
On 03/01/18 23:23, Kubilay Kocak wrote:
This reason doesn't sound correct. Could you explain this further?
If the port can only be used as an app, as opposed to library, multiple
flavors aren't needed. All users care about is an executable. It doesn't
matter what python version is used.
Y
On 3/2/18 5:51 PM, Yuri Victorovich wrote:
> Author: yuri
> Date: Fri Mar 2 06:51:55 2018
> New Revision: 463374
> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/463374
>
> Log:
> security/nyx: Add USE_PYTHON=noflavors; Add LICENSE_FILE
>
> nyx is an app, therefore noflavors.
This reason
