On 3 June 2012 14:29, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:
> Ok, will do next time. I didn't actually bother to ask in this case because
> I'm interested in this port and I'm in python@ :).
I missed the the second part. Sorry for the noise.
--
Eitan Adler
___
f
Eitan Adler wrote on 04.06.2012 01:24:
On 3 June 2012 12:52, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:
Hi!
Sorry, I know I didn't discussed maintainership transferring step with
anybody from python@. But I think that mercurial port is important enough to
keep it's maintenance under collective effort.
Teams
On 3 June 2012 12:52, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Sorry, I know I didn't discussed maintainership transferring step with
> anybody from python@. But I think that mercurial port is important enough to
> keep it's maintenance under collective effort.
Teams are treated exactly like individu
Hi!
Sorry, I know I didn't discussed maintainership transferring step with
anybody from python@. But I think that mercurial port is important
enough to keep it's maintenance under collective effort.
Original Message
Subject: cvs commit: ports/devel/mercuria
