On Sun, Sep 02, 2012 at 16:01:51 +0400, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:
>
> I believe that original intention was not to hardcode the zope port
> version. Yes, there is only one zope version at the moment, but there
> may be more in future. Just though about ports that needs different zope
> version
Li-Wen Hsu wrote on 02.09.2012 20:37:
On Sun, Sep 02, 2012 at 16:01:51 +0400, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:
I believe that original intention was not to hardcode the zope port
version. Yes, there is only one zope version at the moment, but there
may be more in future. Just though about ports that
Hi Li-Wen,
Li-Wen Hsu wrote on 02.09.2012 14:03:
On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 3:31 PM, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:
Hi,
I'm preparing an update of www/plone and discovered thing that's need to be
changed to make USE_ZOPE knob actually work. We do not define ZOPESKELDIR
anymore, so the RUN_DEPENDS lin
On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 3:31 PM, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm preparing an update of www/plone and discovered thing that's need to be
> changed to make USE_ZOPE knob actually work. We do not define ZOPESKELDIR
> anymore, so the RUN_DEPENDS line should be fixed.
> While here, trim some l
Hi,
I'm preparing an update of www/plone and discovered thing that's need to
be changed to make USE_ZOPE knob actually work. We do not define
ZOPESKELDIR anymore, so the RUN_DEPENDS line should be fixed.
While here, trim some leftover from py24/25 removal, that's now always
true in current por
