Re: [RFC] lang/pypy

2013-03-10 Thread poyopoyo
Hi David, At Sun, 10 Mar 2013 21:18:12 +0300, David Naylor wrote: > > however my translation processes under -DPYPY_IGNORE_MEMORY take 2GB > > for normal binary and 2.5GB for sandboxed one so they aggregate 4.5GB > > to run parallel. > > This is good news. Could you please detail how you measur

Re: Re: [RFC] lang/pypy

2013-03-10 Thread David Naylor
On Sunday, 10 March 2013 00:37:15 poyop...@puripuri.plala.or.jp wrote: > Hi, good work, David. Hi Kuro > It compiles, packages and works flawlessly here for replacement of 1.9 > so far for a week. Great, thanks. Good to know :-) > On my compile box, amd64/Athlon64 5050e 2.6GHz 2 core/8GB, > m

Re: [RFC] lang/pypy

2013-03-09 Thread poyopoyo
Hi, good work, David. It compiles, packages and works flawlessly here for replacement of 1.9 so far for a week. On my compile box, amd64/Athlon64 5050e 2.6GHz 2 core/8GB, memory requirement for translation processes is far less than warning shown. It prevents build with | warn: this system has in