Re: FreeBSD python patch for databases/ldb

2013-11-25 Thread Timur I. Bakeyev
Hm, that's true. Well, possibly the right fix would be to implement do-configure target, as piggy-backing on GNU_CONFIGURE doesn't work well anyhow... Lemme think about it. With regards, Timur Bakeyev. On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 4:15 PM, Marcus von Appen wrote: > On, Mon Nov 25, 2013, Timur I. B

Re: FreeBSD python patch for databases/ldb

2013-11-25 Thread Marcus von Appen
On, Mon Nov 25, 2013, Timur I. Bakeyev wrote: > Hi, Marcus! > > I see this patch as useless, as WAF isn't called via shebang. > > Please, take a closer look onto port's Makefile. It is called via shebang in the configure stage. do-configure (from bsd.port.mk) expands to: ${CONFIGURE_ENV} ./${CON

Re: FreeBSD python patch for databases/ldb

2013-11-25 Thread Timur I. Bakeyev
Hi, Marcus! I see this patch as useless, as WAF isn't called via shebang. Please, take a closer look onto port's Makefile. With regards, Timur. On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 6:19 PM, Marcus von Appen wrote: > Dear maintainer of databases/ldb, > > the FreeBSD python team is currently cleaning up th

FreeBSD python patch for databases/ldb

2013-11-24 Thread Marcus von Appen
Dear maintainer of databases/ldb, the FreeBSD python team is currently cleaning up the python ports infrastructure in order to get rid of the implicit lang/python build and run-time dependency for ports. This is done to prepare the ports tree for building packages for multiple python versions at t