Hi David,
At Sun, 10 Mar 2013 21:18:12 +0300,
David Naylor wrote:
> > however my translation processes under -DPYPY_IGNORE_MEMORY take 2GB
> > for normal binary and 2.5GB for sandboxed one so they aggregate 4.5GB
> > to run parallel.
>
> This is good news. Could you please detail how you measur
On Sunday, 10 March 2013 00:37:15 poyop...@puripuri.plala.or.jp wrote:
> Hi, good work, David.
Hi Kuro
> It compiles, packages and works flawlessly here for replacement of 1.9
> so far for a week.
Great, thanks. Good to know :-)
> On my compile box, amd64/Athlon64 5050e 2.6GHz 2 core/8GB,
> m
Hi, good work, David.
It compiles, packages and works flawlessly here for replacement of 1.9
so far for a week.
On my compile box, amd64/Athlon64 5050e 2.6GHz 2 core/8GB,
memory requirement for translation processes is far less than
warning shown. It prevents build with
| warn: this system has in
Hi All.
After many months of (sporadic) work I would like to introduce pypy-2.0.b1.
Could you please have a look at, and test, my proposed changes (attached) and
the wiki page at http://wiki.FreeBSD.org/PyPy.
I would like to commit these changes (after incorporating feedback) sometime
next
