https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243497
--- Comment #39 from John Hein ---
(In reply to dave from comment #38)
(In reply to Harry NEWTON from comment #37)
The conflicting cblas.h issue has nothing to do with the original problem
described in this bug (which was resolved). But fo
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243497
d...@jetcafe.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||d...@jetcafe.org
--- Comment #38
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243497
Harry NEWTON changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||h...@yewbarrow.net
--- Comment #37
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243497
Steve Wills changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|Open|Closed
Resolution|---
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243497
--- Comment #35 from commit-h...@freebsd.org ---
A commit references this bug:
Author: swills
Date: Fri Jan 31 14:08:51 UTC 2020
New revision: 524711
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/524711
Log:
math/py-numpy: improve patc
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243497
--- Comment #34 from lum...@gmail.com ---
I did install py-numpy with the last update without problem on FreeBSD
12.1-RELEASE-p1 and reinstall openblas and suitesparse but when I run:
pkg check -d -n -a
Checking all packages: 100%
py27-nump
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243497
--- Comment #33 from rsm...@xs4all.nl ---
(In reply to Steve Wills from comment #31)
The point that John Hein raises is a valid one; Numpy 1.16 is indeed the last
release to support Python 2.7.
Looking at the numpy release notes, I'm not s
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243497
John Hein changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #210997|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243497
--- Comment #31 from Steve Wills ---
(In reply to rsmith from comment #25)
I think the only reason is no one has done it, please feel free to have a go at
updating cython and numpy, that would be great.
--
You are receiving this mail beca
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243497
--- Comment #30 from Steve Wills ---
(In reply to John Hein from comment #28)
Ah, sorry, didn't see your comments until after I committed the patch. If you
think it's more correct, update your patch and I'll test and commit.
--
You are re
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243497
--- Comment #29 from commit-h...@freebsd.org ---
A commit references this bug:
Author: swills
Date: Thu Jan 23 21:31:23 UTC 2020
New revision: 523944
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/523944
Log:
math/py-numpy: fix build wh
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243497
--- Comment #28 from John Hein ---
(In reply to John Hein from comment #27)
This patch (the patch with the openblas cblas_ddot test vs the patch without)
does have a real effect on the build. _multiarray_umath.so is built
differently (I on
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243497
--- Comment #27 from John Hein ---
Created attachment 210997
--> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=210997&action=edit
[patch] add openblas to list of cblas compatible libs to check
(In reply to John Hein from comment #2
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243497
John Hein changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jcfyecr...@liamekaens.com
--- Comment
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243497
--- Comment #25 from rsm...@xs4all.nl ---
(In reply to Kubilay Kocak from comment #2)
Upstream pull request created: https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/15406
BTW, the numpy master branch (which will become numpy 1.19) doesn't have this
bu
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243497
lum...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lum...@gmail.com
--- Comment #24
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243497
Kubilay Kocak changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://github.com/numpy/nu
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243497
--- Comment #23 from Robert Kruus ---
Yes, but the key was to delete suitesparse first, and any libs in
/usr/local/compat... from the old openblas. Not deleting suitesparse kept
references to libopenblasp.so.0 (from the older version of op
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243497
--- Comment #22 from Steve Wills ---
(In reply to Robert Kruus from comment #19)
Robert, is your issue solved now that you've reinstalled suitesparse?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243497
--- Comment #21 from Steve Wills ---
(In reply to rsmith from comment #20)
I see now. I was able to reproduce with math/blas (blas-3.5.0_6) installed. The
patch does seem to avoid the issue. I'll commit it in a bit.
--
You are receiving t
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243497
--- Comment #20 from rsm...@xs4all.nl ---
(In reply to Steve Wills from comment #1)
The fact that I also have blas-3.5.0_6 installed (for Calculix) has a bearing
on this issue.
> pkg list blas-3.5.0_6
/usr/local/lib/libblas.a
/usr/local/li
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243497
--- Comment #19 from Robert Kruus ---
BTW:
pkg info -x blas
openblas-0.3.7,1
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
freebsd-python@freebsd.org mailing list
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243497
--- Comment #18 from Robert Kruus ---
So py-numpy installed/upgraded fine if I did pkg delete suitesparse and
reinstalled it.
(see https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243524 as to why I did
that).
It rebuilt the following (ev
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243497
--- Comment #17 from rsm...@xs4all.nl ---
(In reply to Kubilay Kocak from comment #2)
Upstream issue: https://github.com/numpy/numpy/issues/15389
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
__
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243497
--- Comment #16 from rsm...@xs4all.nl ---
(In reply to Steve Wills from comment #15)
Here are all my blas packages:
> pkg info -x blas
blas-3.5.0_6
openblas-0.3.7,1
There is no cblas, which explains why the error occurs; the system_info.p
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243497
--- Comment #15 from Steve Wills ---
(In reply to rsmith from comment #14)
Ah, ok. Can you tell me if you have cblas installed or give me a full pkg
listing? Apologies if you did already and I missed it.
--
You are receiving this mail bec
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243497
--- Comment #14 from rsm...@xs4all.nl ---
(In reply to Steve Wills from comment #13)
That was Robert Kruus in comment #7, not me. :-)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
__
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243497
--- Comment #13 from Steve Wills ---
(In reply to rsmith from comment #12)
Sorry, I think I was confused since earlier you said:
"my numpy is now linked to:
/usr/local/lib/compat/pkg/libopenblasp.so.0"
--
You are receiving this mail beca
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243497
--- Comment #12 from rsm...@xs4all.nl ---
(In reply to Steve Wills from comment #11)
I don't have a /usr/local/lib/compat directory.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243497
--- Comment #11 from Steve Wills ---
(In reply to rsmith from comment #10)
What is in your /usr/local/lib/compat/pkg/? Does it change things if you were
to say temporarily rename that directory during the rebuild?
--
You are receiving thi
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243497
--- Comment #10 from rsm...@xs4all.nl ---
(In reply to Steve Wills from comment #3)
I've added my build log as an attachment. I'm building against OpenBlas 0.3.7.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243497
--- Comment #9 from rsm...@xs4all.nl ---
Created attachment 210971
--> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=210971&action=edit
build log
Please find attached the build log.
Below is the info about the OpenBlas I'm building
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243497
--- Comment #8 from Steve Wills ---
(In reply to Robert Kruus from comment #7)
Can you show my the initial build failure message?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
__
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243497
--- Comment #7 from Robert Kruus ---
openblas-0.3.7,1
Just update today. I notice there is no libopenblasp.so in this version, my
numpy is now linked to:
/usr/local/lib/compat/pkg/libopenblasp.so.0
No other blas or lapack installed.
pkg
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243497
--- Comment #6 from Steve Wills ---
(In reply to Robert Kruus from comment #5)
What version of openblas do you have installed? Do you have cblas installed,
and if so what version? (If you have cblas, remove it.) A full `pkg info`
output mig
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243497
--- Comment #5 from Robert Kruus ---
My build fails at configure -- seems to not find the libopenblas for me, see
attached make configure log.
FreeBSD flash.gos.ca 12.1-RELEASE-p1 FreeBSD 12.1-RELEASE-p1 GENERIC amd64
--
You are receivin
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243497
Robert Kruus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||robert.kr...@utoronto.ca
--- Commen
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243497
--- Comment #3 from Steve Wills ---
I wasn't able to reproduce this, so I'm trying to understand what's different
between your build and mine. The full build log would help with that. Are you
using the latest version from ports with the upd
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243497
Kubilay Kocak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-qa
See Also|
39 matches
Mail list logo
