https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237984
Kubilay Kocak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #204751||maintainer-approval+
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237984
Kubilay Kocak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #204520|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237984
Kubilay Kocak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #204520|1 |0
is obsolete|
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237984
--- Comment #13 from Kubilay Kocak ---
(In reply to Kubilay Kocak from comment #12)
Forgot, I need to run through the new test target that I added, which needs
latex, which is huge. I'll include the updated patch tomorrow when that is
comp
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237984
--- Comment #12 from Kubilay Kocak ---
(In reply to TAKATSU Tomonari from comment #11)
My Wip includes a few more changes/additions. I'll attach it shortly
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237984
--- Comment #11 from TAKATSU Tomonari ---
Created attachment 204604
--> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=204604&action=edit
A patch to fix an error "Package names are not unique"
--
You are receiving this mail because
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237984
--- Comment #10 from Kubilay Kocak ---
(In reply to Antoine Brodin from comment #9)
-O on noflavors, it should be used very sparingly, port should have had
PKGNAMEPREFIX (or SUFFIX) from the start, port has zero dependents, and
switching p
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237984
--- Comment #9 from Antoine Brodin ---
(In reply to Kubilay Kocak from comment #8)
I think noflavors would be better than PKGNAMEPREFIX, changing PKGBASE breaks
upgrade for end users.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on th
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237984
--- Comment #8 from Kubilay Kocak ---
(In reply to Greg V from comment #7)
I've fixed that in my WIP, port is missing PYTHONPGNAMEPREFIX, I'll attach
something here shortly
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list f
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237984
--- Comment #7 from Greg V ---
(In reply to TAKATSU Tomonari from comment #6)
Yeah, I saw that as well..
Should it be PYTHON=noflavors?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237984
TAKATSU Tomonari changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|Open|In Progress
--- Comment #6 from
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237984
--- Comment #5 from Kubilay Kocak ---
(In reply to Greg V from comment #4)
All good mate. I'm going to make the USES=python change (allowing 2 *and* 3)
along with adding a test target if I can (for good QA), as it is a blanket
candidate no
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237984
Kubilay Kocak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-patch |
--
You are receiving this mail b
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237984
Greg V changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #204469|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237984
Kubilay Kocak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-patch
--- Comment #3 from Ku
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237984
--- Comment #2 from Greg V ---
(In reply to Kubilay Kocak from comment #1)
No, but does anyone need this to use Python 2? PYTHON_DEFAULT recently became
3.6 (finally!) so I'd like to remove python2.7 from my system.
I can flavorize of cou
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237984
Kubilay Kocak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-qa
Summary|print/
17 matches
Mail list logo
