https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230140
Danilo G. Baio changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-qa|
Assignee|pyt...@freebs
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230140
--- Comment #21 from Danilo G. Baio ---
This sphinx update was already postponed for a long time.
If we have two versions of sphinx in tree, which is very likely, a shared macro
will be necessary to organize it (as described in comment 13)
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230140
--- Comment #20 from Mathieu Arnold ---
Well sphinx is usually used for generating docs, so ports that need 2.7 can
loose their extra documentation either until they get updated or get removed.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230140
--- Comment #19 from Danilo G. Baio ---
The latest version of Sphinx is 3.0.2, there are a few ports that doens't build
with it, e.g. the full set of LLVM, more details on bug 245629, it's not just
an issue with Python 2.7 here.
Sphinx 1.8
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230140
--- Comment #18 from Li-Wen Hsu ---
(In reply to Mathieu Arnold from comment #17)
Oh, that would also work, if all the ports require old sphinx are because of
python 2, we can schedule to remove them.
The point is, it's (was) not related t
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230140
--- Comment #17 from Mathieu Arnold ---
Why not simply update sphinx to the latest version and remove all the ports
that really really need 2.7. Those have had 7 or 8 years to switch to Python 3
and are considered abandonware.
All you wou
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230140
--- Comment #16 from Li-Wen Hsu ---
(In reply to Kubilay Kocak from comment #15)
I'm fine for having the dependency line in the Makefile of individual port
(maybe I'm more prefer to that.)
I want to point out that this ticket gets stuck be
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230140
--- Comment #15 from Kubilay Kocak ---
(In reply to Li-Wen Hsu from comment #14)
This can be resolved FIXED when a 1.8.x update lands (pre or post repocopy)
I'm -1 on the addition of another shared macro (see bug 243665 c10)
--
You are
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230140
--- Comment #14 from Li-Wen Hsu ---
(In reply to Danilo G. Baio from comment #13)
I like this approach, this gets us a more recent version of sphinx for more and
more ports require it and also takes care of the ports require old version. I
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230140
Danilo G. Baio changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.freebsd.org/bu
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230140
--- Comment #12 from Antoine Brodin ---
Where is the patch for all previously detected failures?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
freebsd-python@fr
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230140
Antoine Brodin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|exp-run+|exp-run?
--
You are receiving th
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230140
Li-Wen Hsu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|exp-run?|exp-run+
--- Comment #11 from Li-Wen
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230140
Li-Wen Hsu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|Open|In Progress
Summary|textpr
14 matches
Mail list logo
