https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204899
Dan Langille changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|New |Closed
Resolution|---
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204899
--- Comment #21 from commit-h...@freebsd.org ---
A commit references this bug:
Author: dvl
Date: Tue Jan 30 02:20:10 UTC 2018
New revision: 460369
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/460369
Log:
Fix for use with either GSSAPI
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204899
--- Comment #20 from John W. O'Brien ---
(In reply to John W. O'Brien from comment #19)
Oops. Small typo in the patch. UPDATING should say "built with" not "build
with". Please fix before committing.
--
You are receiving this mail becaus
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204899
John W. O'Brien changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #189754||maintainer-approval?
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204899
--- Comment #18 from John W. O'Brien ---
The problem lies in how the principal name type in the main call to
gss_import_name is patched from MIT to Heimdal.
py-kerberos uses [0] gss_krb5_nt_service_name, which krb5 defines as [1]
gss_nt_se
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204899
John W. O'Brien changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|204185 |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugs
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204899
--- Comment #17 from John W. O'Brien ---
(In reply to Dan Langille from comment #10)
I reproduced this bug with security/py-kerberos 1.2.4 and updated the attached
operational state records and test case results.
--
You are receiving thi
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204899
John W. O'Brien changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #163664|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204899
John W. O'Brien changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #163663|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204899
John W. O'Brien changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #163662|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204899
John W. O'Brien changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #163661|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204899
John W. O'Brien changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #163660|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204899
John W. O'Brien changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #163659|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204899
--- Comment #10 from Dan Langille ---
Now that security/py-kerberos is on 1.2.4, can someone test for this bug
please?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204899
--- Comment #9 from Kubilay Kocak ---
(In reply to John W. O'Brien from comment #8)
needs-qa is used to cover all the 'has questions / needs checking' cases at the
moment for simplicity. Correct current descriptions can be seen here
https
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204899
--- Comment #8 from John W. O'Brien ---
@koobs: No, it isn't a regression. Prior to ports r401816, via enhancement bug
#199123, it was not possible to build security/py-kerberos against the BASE nor
HEIMDAL Kerberos implementations. My test
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204899
Kubilay Kocak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-qa
CC|
17 matches
Mail list logo
