https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204594
Ruslan Makhmatkhanov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|In Progress |Closed
Resolution|-
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204594
--- Comment #29 from commit-h...@freebsd.org ---
A commit references this bug:
Author: rm
Date: Tue Jan 5 08:42:05 UTC 2016
New revision: 405276
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/405276
Log:
math/py-networkx: let it build
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204594
Kubilay Kocak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch, patch-ready
--
You are rec
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204594
--- Comment #28 from diks...@sfc.wide.ad.jp ---
(In reply to Kubilay Kocak from comment #26)
@Koobs thank you for the reminder. I just add + maintainer-approval.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204594
diks...@sfc.wide.ad.jp changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #164187|maintainer-approval?(dikshi |maintainer-approval+
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204594
--- Comment #27 from John W. O'Brien ---
(In reply to Kubilay Kocak from comment #26)
Are you suggesting that I need to do something? There are two patches attached
to this bug, one received maintainer approval and has already been committ
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204594
--- Comment #26 from Kubilay Kocak ---
@Dickshie, please set maintainer-approval to + on the attachment you approve.
@John, we'll want only a single approved, non-obsolete attachment here to
progress
--
You are receiving this mail becaus
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204594
--- Comment #25 from diks...@sfc.wide.ad.jp ---
(In reply to John W. O'Brien from comment #24)
I am fine with this solution.
please go ahead commit it. after that we can think about poudriere.
thanks!
--
You are receiving this mail be
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204594
--- Comment #24 from John W. O'Brien ---
I still favor the path that tells the truth and requires action on the part of
the user over the path that lies and requires nothing of the user. The BROKEN
mechanism is not a perfect solution, but i
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204594
--- Comment #23 from Ruslan Makhmatkhanov ---
Ok, understood. So what the consensus is? We keep up with your latest patch and
do not allow user to get the py3 package without manual intervention, or we use
.undef solution to let user get th
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204594
--- Comment #22 from John W. O'Brien ---
@rm: No worries. I finally got around to learning why poudriere doesn't skip
the BROKEN port
(https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2015-December/101361.html).
It turns out that's by desi
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204594
Ruslan Makhmatkhanov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|Open|In Progress
--- Comment #21
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204594
John W. O'Brien changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #164187||maintainer-approval?(dikshi
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204594
--- Comment #19 from John W. O'Brien ---
@rm: For those who get as far as building with poudriere, fiddling with options
seems almost like a given. The reason I prefer the latter option is because the
former option will result in a package
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204594
--- Comment #18 from Ruslan Makhmatkhanov ---
Good catch, John. I'd prefer to go the first way this evening after testing.
First because it will not be possible to build the port with python3 in
poudriere w/o user intervention (unchecking o
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204594
--- Comment #17 from diks...@sfc.wide.ad.jp ---
(In reply to John W. O'Brien from comment #16)
I am fine with your solution.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204594
--- Comment #16 from John W. O'Brien ---
I found the following precedents for what to do in this case.
www/py-cherrypy -- leave the option alone but nuke the associated
${opt}_RUN_DEPENDS based on PYTHON_REL
.if ${PYTHON_REL} >= 3000
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204594
--- Comment #15 from Ruslan Makhmatkhanov ---
The sad news that I can't redefine OPTIONS_DEFAULT values depending on python
version. I mean this is not working:
.include
.if ${PYTHON_REL} <= 3000
OPTIONS_DEFAULT+= MPL GRAPHVIZ
.end
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204594
--- Comment #14 from diks...@sfc.wide.ad.jp ---
(In reply to Ruslan Makhmatkhanov from comment #9)
Many thanks!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
f
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204594
Kubilay Kocak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|201349 |
--
You are receiving this mail b
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204594
Kubilay Kocak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||201349
--
You are receiving this
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204594
--- Comment #13 from Ruslan Makhmatkhanov ---
Ok, nevermind, I'll cook the patch myself now.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
freebsd-python@freebs
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204594
--- Comment #12 from John W. O'Brien ---
rm@ What I meant was that bug #201349 made the dependencies optional so that
ports users interested in py3k could readily adapt and that math/py-networkx
wouldn't necessarily have to encode knowledge
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204594
Ruslan Makhmatkhanov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |---
Status|Clos
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204594
--- Comment #10 from John W. O'Brien ---
rm@: Would you consider backing out the python2 limitation, or perhaps
accepting a patch from me that automatically removes those options from
OPTIONS_DEFAULT when being built under py3k? I had submi
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204594
Ruslan Makhmatkhanov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|Ne
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204594
--- Comment #8 from commit-h...@freebsd.org ---
A commit references this bug:
Author: rm
Date: Thu Nov 19 18:36:59 UTC 2015
New revision: 401958
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/401958
Log:
math/py-networkx: update to 1.10
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204594
--- Comment #6 from Kubilay Kocak ---
(In reply to John W. O'Brien from comment #5)
Actually it's the maintainer-approval flag (attachment context).
At the moment there is a permissions issue which precludes a person (normally
the maintai
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204594
Kubilay Kocak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #163186|maintainer-approval?(dikshi |maintainer-approval+
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204594
John W. O'Brien changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|maintainer-feedback?(dikshi |maintainer-feedback+
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204594
--- Comment #4 from diks...@sfc.wide.ad.jp ---
looks good for me.
Approved.
(Sorry, previously I used wrong email address for this bug)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204594
Ruslan Makhmatkhanov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD. |r...@freebsd.org
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204594
diks...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||diks...@gmail.com
--- Comment #
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204594
--- Comment #2 from John W. O'Brien ---
Created attachment 163188
--> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=163188&action=edit
py34-networkx-1.10 testport log
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204594
--- Comment #1 from John W. O'Brien ---
Created attachment 163187
--> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=163187&action=edit
py27-networkx-1.10 testport log
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204594
Bug ID: 204594
Summary: math/py-networkx: Update to 1.10
Product: Ports & Packages
Version: Latest
Hardware: Any
OS: Any
Status: New
Severity: Affec
36 matches
Mail list logo
