On 5/27/2014 13:43, Bartłomiej Rutkowski wrote:
>
> The 2.0.1 version was released instead, and I am sending the PR with
> update tonight, so, please, close the current PR as we're doing
> proper version bump.
Okay, but I prefer to keep everything on the same PR. Can you just mail
the patches as
On 5/27/2014 00:03, Bartłomiej Rutkowski wrote:
>
> I've asked him for confirmation if what's up there now
> (24f638daa0c28a9d44db2282d46ea3edfd4c7d11a656e38677b741620bf1483d) is
> what he wants it to be, and it if is, then we'll get distfiles fixed,
> hopefully, for the last time, as I've also as
On 5/26/2014 22:31, Bartłomiej Rutkowski wrote:
>
> Wiadomość napisana przez Bartłomiej Rutkowski w dniu
> 26 maj 2014, o godz. 22:23:
>
>>
>> Wiadomość napisana przez John Marino w dniu 26
>> maj 2014, o godz. 22:18:
>>
>>> On 5/26/2014 2
On 5/26/2014 22:12, Bartłomiej Rutkowski wrote:
> SHA256 (demjson-2.0.tar.gz) =
> 24f638daa0c28a9d44db2282d46ea3edfd4c7d11a656e38677b741620bf1483d
> SIZE (demjson-2.0.tar.gz) = 115914
>
> what perfectly matches what the author says it should be. I've asked him if
> he can check his release syste
On 5/26/2014 21:36, Bartłomiej Rutkowski wrote:
> I've just mailed the upstream, explaining the situation and
> suggesting releasing such changes as minor version numbers, like
> 2.0.1 or something similar. We'll see what, if any response will I
> receive, but for now, please, patch the port with n
Synopsis: devel/py-demjson: unfetchable due to rerolled tarball
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-python->marino
Responsible-Changed-By: marino
Responsible-Changed-When: Mon May 26 08:46:30 UTC 2014
Responsible-Changed-Why:
I'll take it.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?p
The following reply was made to PR ports/186284; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: John Marino
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: ports/186284: lang/python27: [PATCH] Several python ports fail
after staging due to library that links itself
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 19:39:07 +0100
On 12/24/2013 17:54, William Grzybowski wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 4:43 PM, John Marino
> wrote:
>> The impact is that they will disappear from dports, because we don't
>> feature ports that can't have binary packages. I'm sure there was a
>> good
On 12/24/2013 17:33, William Grzybowski wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 4:26 PM, John Marino
> wrote:
>> Recently, probably caused by recent changes to devel/py-setuptools,
>> around 6 ports broke all in the same way. An example is below:
>> Is python@ aware and are
Recently, probably caused by recent changes to devel/py-setuptools,
around 6 ports broke all in the same way. An example is below:
> ===
> ===> brebis-0.8 depends on package: py33-setuptools>0 - not found
> ===>Verifying install for py33-setup
On 11/21/2013 12:52, William Grzybowski wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 9:48 AM, John Marino
> wrote:
>> On 11/11/2013 16:22, William Grzybowski wrote:
>> Hi William,
>> It appears this exp-run was performed a week ago
>> (http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cg
On 11/11/2013 16:22, William Grzybowski wrote:
> We are aware of the issue.
>
> --record option from setup.py is registering a directory whereas it
> should not. It is believed the update from distribute to setuptools
> will fix this issue, but it is pending an exp-run ports/183726.
>
Hi William
I have discovered at least 3 python ports that use
PYDISTUTILS_AUTOPLIST, and fail to package due to faulty generated plists.
The ports are:
www/py-flexget
devel/py-robotframework-ride
science/py-pydap/
errors seen during repo creation:
> pkg-static: /packages/All/py27-robotframework-ride-1
On 11/3/2013 16:24, William Grzybowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can you please give it another go with r332618?
>
Hi William,
That simple one-liner worked like magic.
Thanks!
John
___
freebsd-python@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/lis
On 10/29/2013 11:15, Kubilay Kocak wrote:
> On 29/10/2013 8:18 PM, Marcus von Appen wrote:
>>
>> For those with too much free time at their hands: feel free to go
>> through John's list
>> and fix the ports to use a proper python version at build time instead
>> of `python` :-).
>>
>
> Thanks for
Per IRC conversation with mva, I'm sending python@ a list of ports that
currently don't build in DragonFly poudriere due to ports infrastructure
problems. I have not changed the python default in make.conf. It would
be nice to get Mk/bsd.python.mk (or whatever) fixed so these ports build
in poudr
The following reply was made to PR ports/178008; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: John Marino
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: ports/178008: www/py-djangotoolbox: unfetchable distfile, fragile
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2013 11:34:32 +0200
On 21 Apr 2013, John Hixson wrote:
> I
ports with this one:
http://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/~marino/misc/py-qt/patch-configure.py
It builds fine for me on using FreeBSD 9.0 and the latest ports. You
need to remove the BROKEN line and bump the port revision in the
makefile still, of course.
The following reply was made to PR ports/177350; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: John Marino
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: ports/177350: x11-toolkits/py-qt: [PATCH] fix provided from
DragonFly
Ports
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 17:26:17 +0100
From that error log, I'd say
19 matches
Mail list logo
