Re: NUDGE: pip for v3?

me on smoothing. > Have a play and let us know what works and what doesn't, and we're > always available on #freebsd-python (freenode IRC) if you'd like to have > a chat Will do, thanks! --Paul Hoffman ___ freeb

NUDGE: pip for v3?

eted object-oriented programming language What is the best way for me to install pip for Python 3 if not from pkg? --Paul Hoffman ___ freebsd-python@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-python To unsubscribe, send

pip for v3?

eted object-oriented programming language What is the best way for me to install pip for Python 3 if not from pkg? --Paul Hoffman ___ freebsd-python@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-python To unsubscribe, send

Re: The state of packages based on Python ports

On Feb 1, 2012, at 3:55 PM, Mark Linimon wrote: > On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 07:53:41AM -0800, Paul Hoffman wrote: >> HOWEVER, it doesn't answer the question of packages for 3.x. Is the >> policy "there can be (mostly) only one set of packages for Python >> modules

Re: The state of packages based on Python ports

On Jan 31, 2012, at 9:18 PM, Mark Linimon wrote: > On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 05:37:54PM -0800, Paul Hoffman wrote: >> ftp.freebsd.org: /pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-8.2-release/All > > We don't update ports in the *-release directories once the release > has been cut.

Re: The state of packages based on Python ports

On Jan 31, 2012, at 5:11 PM, wen heping wrote: > Maybe you should check your /etc/make.conf , do you set default python > version to 2.6 ? I'm talking about packages in the FreeBSD packages repository, not ports I build on my box. --Paul Hoffman___ f

Re: The state of packages based on Python ports

On Jan 31, 2012, at 4:45 PM, Mark Linimon wrote: > On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 04:24:24PM -0800, Paul Hoffman wrote: >> Nearly all of the packages in the packages system for Python-related >> ports are for Python 2.6 *only*. > > er, you'll have to tell me where you'r

The state of packages based on Python ports

OK, so that last one went nowhere, let me try a more general topic. Nearly all of the packages in the packages system for Python-related ports are for Python 2.6 *only*. Those packages cannot be applied to Python 2.7 or Python 3.x. Is there a good reason for this, particularly in light of the mu

py-sqlite3 missing in packages, needed for Python >2.6

Greetings again. I opened a thread in the forums: that is relevant here. In short: In the packages system, there is py26-sqlite3-2.6.6_1.tbz, which only applies to Python 2.6. Many (most?) of us are running Python 2.7 or 3.x. I need a package

Re: Moving from 2.4 to 2.5?

At 6:31 PM -0700 5/11/08, Xin LI wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Paul Hoffman wrote: | Greetings. I have python2.4 and python2.5 installed on my 6.0 box. I | installed 2.4 first, of course. What is the proper method for making | /usr/local/bin/python (and /usr/bin/python

Moving from 2.4 to 2.5?

Greetings. I have python2.4 and python2.5 installed on my 6.0 box. I installed 2.4 first, of course. What is the proper method for making /usr/local/bin/python (and /usr/bin/python) 2.5? I didn't see a script in /usr/local/bin/py* that did this. --Paul Ho