On 8/23/2012 4:27 PM, Mark Linimon wrote:
> FYI, I would like your approval on these (just the commit of BROKEN; I
> do not expect you to try to fix them).
I'm confused. Since when does portmgr need the approval of a maintainer
to tag something BROKEN?
--
I am only one, but I am one. I can
So apparently we have a python vulnerability according to
http://portaudit.FreeBSD.org/b4f8be9e-56b2-11e1-9fb7-003067b2972c.html,
but I'm not seeing an upgrade to address it yet. Any idea when that will
happen?
Thanks,
Doug
--
It's always a long day; 86400 doesn't fit into a short.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Mon, 28 Jun 2010, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
Please drop the attached patch in ports/devel/boost-libs/files,
rebuild all dependencies, and try your deluge ports again[1].
Jung-uk Kim
[1] Your libtorrent Python slave port and deluge ports don't
build
On 03/26/10 14:03, Steven Kreuzer wrote:
> So, it seems like most of the time python scripts will work with
> HUGE_STACK_SIZE
> turned off, but every once and a while some scripts will fail in non obvious
> ways
> that could leave a person scratching their head for weeks trying to get to
> the b
Wesley Shields wrote:
> On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 10:58:05AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
>> Kelly Hays wrote:
>>> On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 11:54 AM, Martin Wilke wrote:
>>>>Once the installed Python has been updated to 2.6, by using one of the
>>>>
Kelly Hays wrote:
> On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 11:54 AM, Martin Wilke wrote:
>>Once the installed Python has been updated to 2.6, by using one of the
>>methods above, it is required to run the upgrade-site-packages target in
>>lang/python to assure that site-packages are made available to
