On 17.09.2013 08:59, Daniel Braniss wrote:
>> On 29/07/2013 5:46 PM, David Demelier wrote:
>>> 2013/7/28 Daniel Braniss :
>>>> Hi,
>>>> I need to be able to have both (2.7 and 3.2) modules.
>>>> setting PYTHON_VERSION=3.2 in /etc/make.conf com
On 29.08.2013 19:55, Marcus von Appen wrote:
> On, Thu Aug 29, 2013, David Demelier wrote:
>
>> 2013/8/29 Marcus von Appen :
>>> David Demelier :
>>>
>>>
>>>> 2013/8/29 Marcus von Appen :
>>>>>
>>>>> David Demelier
On 29.08.2013 19:55, Marcus von Appen wrote:
> On, Thu Aug 29, 2013, David Demelier wrote:
>
>> 2013/8/29 Marcus von Appen :
>>> David Demelier :
>>>
>>>
>>>> 2013/8/29 Marcus von Appen :
>>>>>
>>>>> David Demelier
2013/8/29 Marcus von Appen :
> David Demelier :
>
>
>> 2013/8/29 Marcus von Appen :
>>>
>>> David Demelier :
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>>> It's weird, I still have some conflicts with the new wrappers:
>>>>
>>
2013/8/29 Marcus von Appen :
> David Demelier :
>
> [...]
>
>> It's weird, I still have some conflicts with the new wrappers:
>>
>> Proceed with installing packages [y/N]: y
>> Checking integrity...
>> Conflict found on path /usr/local/bin/2to3-3 b
2013/8/2 Marcus von Appen :
> Dear all,
>
> as discussed previously on this list, users would love to install the
> same python for multiple python versions.
>
> Besides other issues (which I'll summarize in a different mail), one
> problem, especially for binary packages, are the "am I the default
2013/8/19 Marcus von Appen :
> On, Sun Aug 18, 2013, The BSD Dreamer wrote:
>
> [...]
>> What wasn't clear was that this applied to everybody, whether they knowingly
>> installed lang/python2* or lang/python3*, or not. Since, installing a port
>> that wants the python results in lang/python27 bein
2013/8/10 Marcus von Appen :
> The diff at http://people.freebsd.org/~mva/python-wrapper.diff was
> updated to include additional symlinks to bin/{2|3}, since those
> were missing in the previous patch, which could break some ports that
> use e.g. bin/python2 or bin/python3 on build time.
>
> O
2013/7/30 Marcus von Appen :
> David, Daniel,
>
> just to take this to python@ and to clarify, what problems are still open
> for you:
>
> - bapt confirmed that the parallel installation of python itself from binary
> packages should work
> without any problem
> - Installation from the ports tree
Hello,
At the moment, it's very hard to install python 2.7 and 3.3 because of
the unification of the python ports. Also, pkgng will not let the user
install both the 2.7 and 3.3 version of the interpreter because it
will conflicts on several files such as /usr/local/bin/python for
example.
What I
10 matches
Mail list logo
