On 7/31/17 9:20 PM, Kubilay Kocak wrote:
> On 8/1/17 2:32 AM, Bryan Drewery wrote:
>> Author: bdrewery
>> Date: Mon Jul 31 16:32:36 2017
>> New Revision: 446986
>> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/446986
>>
>> Log:
>> Allow port
On 7/31/2017 9:40 AM, Marcelo Araujo wrote:
> Thank you! I did open the review for the inclusion of py3-verboselogs.
Cool, approved.
--
Regards,
Bryan Drewery
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 7/31/2017 9:26 AM, Bryan Drewery wrote:
> On 7/31/2017 3:28 AM, Kubilay Kocak wrote:
>> On 7/31/17 8:07 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 05:03:35PM +0800, Marcelo Araujo wrote:
>>>> 2017-07-31 10:35 GMT+08:00 Kubilay Kocak :
>>&
ill allow py3- dependencies to
build properly. It would allow existing py3- leaf ports to build as well.
As for py3- leaf ports I would allow them but they have to follow strict
criteria:
- They must be named category/py3-foo
- They must be a *slave* port to a category/py-foo
- They must be supported on all python versions, not just 3.4+ or
something odd like that.
The FLAVORS support in Poudriere is done. What is held up is an exp-run
that I'm tasked with and various bugs/documentation/more exp-runs.
Every new py3- port added that doesn't follow those rules means we have
to change Poudriere again. I think the criteria above is reasonable but
I know the last one is problematic.
I've said on IRC before but not sure I have here, that py3- ports beyond
the fixed cases above, are only useful for generating a leaf package for
users to download. They can still build category/py-foo as PYTHON3
today though. So there is an alternative but it is just not
package-friendly yet.
About the block being premature, I will agree that what was lacking was
a communication about it to a wider community and an override allowed
with Portmgr review. At the time I wasn't quite sure what the criteria
for an override would even be. Now that I understand it more and have
Poudriere being a bit smarter than my first implementation, I will tweak
the block to allow a Portmgr override.
> variants supports lands, whichever one comes first. If that's in 3 days,
> great, if its in 3 weeks or 2 months, our developers have been allowed
> to keep the status quo working.
>
> Users are currently being impacted where there is no alternative and
> they should not be asked to pay that price for our dislike of py3-* ports.
>
> Best regards,
> Koobs
>
--
Regards,
Bryan Drewery
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 7/28/15 10:43 PM, David Naylor wrote:
> On Tuesday, 28 July 2015 17:08:37 Bryan Drewery wrote:
>
>> On 7/28/15 11:46 AM, David Naylor wrote:
>
>>> Why would the shared library be found when using a relative
>>>
On 7/28/15 11:46 AM, David Naylor wrote:
> Why would the shared library be found when using a relative path but not
> when using an absolute path? Is this a bug in FreeBSD?
What is the output for readelf?
readelf -d `which pypy`|grep -i libr
--
Regards,
Bryan D
:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/porting-submitting.html
If you already have PR needing to be committed please let us know and we
will try to get on them ASAP.
--
Regards,
Bryan Drewery
on behalf of portmgr
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital
On 3/2/2014 1:14 PM, Bryan Drewery wrote:
> On 3/1/2014 12:05 PM, Martin Wilke wrote:
>> Author: miwi
>> Date: Sat Mar 1 18:05:46 2014
>> New Revision: 346687
>> URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/346687
>> QAT: https://qat.redports.org/buildarchive/r
te-packages/tests/__init__.py
py27-turbomail also installs this file and depend on Pastescript which
conflicts and now fails to build.
python@: Why not stick to using the egg dirs? It is much safer to avoid
polluting global namespace.
--
Regards,
Bryan Drewery
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Yes. The simplest guidance is that if the package changes, bump
PORTREVISION. It seems bad to have 2 different packages of the same
version installing files to different places.
Regards,
Bryan Drewery
Especially if it installs to a different place.
On 2014-02-06 14:08, Marcus von Appen wrote
s framework support that does not
respect PREFIX, try using -n as well, which will stick to
PREFIX=LOCALBASE. In this case, using -n passes the test with testport
on ansible.
--
Regards,
Bryan Drewery
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
The following reply was made to PR ports/173501; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Bryan Drewery
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, willia...@gmail.com
Cc:
Subject: Re: ports/173501: irc/py-irclib build failure on amd64
Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2012 11:30:58 -0600
I think the problem is that it is
The following reply was made to PR ports/156076; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Bryan Drewery
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: ports/156076: [patch] databases/py-sqlite3: Undefined symbol
"sqlite3_load_extension"
Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2012 22:32:39 -0500
The patch w
it best to include ports@.
Regards,
Bryan Drewery
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJPnLSwAAoJEG54KsA8mwz5iXUQALThHzZUfNmrR6P9Ze46d2Vm
fwhKD3A20SeVz/HfuwHlkdGZcWWdCvPhhNmuTDb8z+quYf2UX2dmVp
14 matches
Mail list logo
