Dear port maintainer,
The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your
ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check
each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245738
Ashish SHUKLA changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|ports-b...@freebsd.org |ash...@freebsd.org
--- Comment #4
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245755
Kubilay Kocak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-patch |
Flags|maintainer-fee
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245775
Kubilay Kocak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||merge-quarterly?
--- Comment #5 fr
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244279
--- Comment #11 from Kubilay Kocak ---
Thank you for the detail and confirmation. Danilo (dbaio) is taking care of
QA'ing Firefox/Thunderbird with (only) JSOn1 enabled. We should be good to
progress this and the dependent issue after that
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245756
Kubilay Kocak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|merge-quarterly?|merge-quarterly+
Statu
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245775
--- Comment #4 from m...@gmx.net ---
(In reply to Kubilay Kocak from comment #3)
For the time being there is a forwarding in place to the new repo. So the
change is more a matter of long term hygiene.
--
You are receiving this mail because
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245756
--- Comment #5 from commit-h...@freebsd.org ---
A commit references this bug:
Author: delphij
Date: Tue Apr 21 03:27:08 UTC 2020
New revision: 532248
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/532248
Log:
MFH: r532213 r532225
pyt
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245756
--- Comment #6 from commit-h...@freebsd.org ---
A commit references this bug:
Author: delphij
Date: Tue Apr 21 03:27:08 UTC 2020
New revision: 532248
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/532248
Log:
MFH: r532213 r532225
pyt
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245775
Kubilay Kocak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|New |Open
Severity|Affects So
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245756
Kubilay Kocak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|Closed |In Progress
Flags|mai
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245776
Wen Heping changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|pyt...@freebsd.org |port...@freebsd.org
--
You are recei
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245776
Wen Heping changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|lang/python27: Update to|[exp-run] lang/python27:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245776
Wen Heping changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #213619|maintainer-approval?|
Flags|
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245776
Wen Heping changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||w...@freebsd.org
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241463
VVD changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #212879|maintainer-approval?|
Flags|
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245776
Bug ID: 245776
Summary: lang/python27: Update to 2.7.18 (last version of
Python 2) with vulnerability fix
Product: Ports & Packages
Version: Latest
Hardware: Any
Bugzilla Automation has asked freebsd-python mailing
list for maintainer-feedback:
Bug 245776: lang/python27: Update to 2.7.18 (last version of Python 2) with
vulnerability fix
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245776
--- Description ---
Python 2.7.18 is the last release of Pyt
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245756
Xin LI changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|Open|Closed
Resolution|---
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245756
--- Comment #3 from commit-h...@freebsd.org ---
A commit references this bug:
Author: delphij
Date: Mon Apr 20 20:01:50 UTC 2020
New revision: 532225
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/532225
Log:
Depend on devel/py-hglib.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245773
Bug ID: 245773
Summary: lang/python3: Missing errno.EDEADLOCK
Product: Ports & Packages
Version: Latest
Hardware: Any
OS: Any
Status: New
Severity:
Bugzilla Automation has asked freebsd-python mailing
list for maintainer-feedback:
Bug 245773: lang/python3: Missing errno.EDEADLOCK
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245773
--- Description ---
In the Python module errno the constant errno.EDEADLOCK is missing. According
to the
On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 11:19:07AM -0700, paul beard wrote:
> Has anyone reported this? Or am I just lucky?
>
> I'll see if I can pull that info together.
Not that I'm aware. I use certbot with nginx on my servers and it's
fine, but I'm curious in knowing what is happening.
You can send that in
Has anyone reported this? Or am I just lucky?
I'll see if I can pull that info together.
On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 11:05 AM Danilo G. Baio wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 10:06:38AM -0700, paul beard wrote:
> > Yes, I do. I use the packages and source from the SVN repo. I also use
> > /usr/local
On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 10:06:38AM -0700, paul beard wrote:
> Yes, I do. I use the packages and source from the SVN repo. I also use
> /usr/local… not smart enough to change any of that without breakage so I
> leave it all alone.
Could you reinstall packages py37-certbot and py37-certbot-nginx?
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230140
--- Comment #20 from Mathieu Arnold ---
Well sphinx is usually used for generating docs, so ports that need 2.7 can
loose their extra documentation either until they get updated or get removed.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245738
--- Comment #3 from Stefan Ehmann ---
Added patch against revision 527560 instead of shar.
ashish can keep the port if he wants to.
But set me (shoes...@gmx.net) as new maintainer, if it would be reset to ports@
otherwise.
--
You are re
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245738
--- Comment #2 from Stefan Ehmann ---
Created attachment 213608
--> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=213608&action=edit
diff against py-mcomix r527560
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245629
--- Comment #1 from Antoine Brodin ---
+DOCS_BUILD_DEPENDS=
sphinx-build-${PYTHON_VER}:textproc/py-sphinx18@${PY_FLAVOR}
I think you should depend on the package instead, otherwise some people will
complain that they have sphinx-build
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245738
Stefan Ehmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #213558|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245756
--- Comment #2 from commit-h...@freebsd.org ---
A commit references this bug:
Author: delphij
Date: Mon Apr 20 17:21:26 UTC 2020
New revision: 532213
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/532213
Log:
python-hglib is a library w
Yes, I do. I use the packages and source from the SVN repo. I also use
/usr/local… not smart enough to change any of that without breakage so I
leave it all alone.
On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 9:55 AM Danilo G. Baio wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 07:42:46AM -0700, paul beard wrote:
> > This seems t
On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 07:42:46AM -0700, paul beard wrote:
> This seems to be a recurring issue each time certbox and its nginx plugin
> are updated. the workaround/solution is to reinstall them manually.
>
> for i in py-certbot py-certbot-nginx; do cd /usr/ports/security/$i; make
> > deinstall
This seems to be a recurring issue each time certbox and its nginx plugin
are updated. the workaround/solution is to reinstall them manually.
for i in py-certbot py-certbot-nginx; do cd /usr/ports/security/$i; make
> deinstall reinstall clean; done
and then certbot runs fine, either by hand o
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230140
--- Comment #19 from Danilo G. Baio ---
The latest version of Sphinx is 3.0.2, there are a few ports that doens't build
with it, e.g. the full set of LLVM, more details on bug 245629, it's not just
an issue with Python 2.7 here.
Sphinx 1.8
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230140
--- Comment #18 from Li-Wen Hsu ---
(In reply to Mathieu Arnold from comment #17)
Oh, that would also work, if all the ports require old sphinx are because of
python 2, we can schedule to remove them.
The point is, it's (was) not related t
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244279
Sascha Biberhofer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|maintainer-feedback?(ports@ |maintainer-feedback+
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244279
--- Comment #10 from Sascha Biberhofer ---
(In reply to Kubilay Kocak from comment #9)
Sorry for the delay. The synapse update is completely independent of the
updates in bug 245252 and bug 243602. This is particularly true for the
py-twis
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230140
--- Comment #17 from Mathieu Arnold ---
Why not simply update sphinx to the latest version and remove all the ports
that really really need 2.7. Those have had 7 or 8 years to switch to Python 3
and are considered abandonware.
All you wou
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230140
--- Comment #16 from Li-Wen Hsu ---
(In reply to Kubilay Kocak from comment #15)
I'm fine for having the dependency line in the Makefile of individual port
(maybe I'm more prefer to that.)
I want to point out that this ticket gets stuck be
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230140
--- Comment #15 from Kubilay Kocak ---
(In reply to Li-Wen Hsu from comment #14)
This can be resolved FIXED when a 1.8.x update lands (pre or post repocopy)
I'm -1 on the addition of another shared macro (see bug 243665 c10)
--
You are
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244279
Kubilay Kocak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|maintainer-feedback+|maintainer-feedback?(ports@
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245747
nimaje+...@bureaucracy.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||merge-quarterly?
--- Co
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230140
--- Comment #14 from Li-Wen Hsu ---
(In reply to Danilo G. Baio from comment #13)
I like this approach, this gets us a more recent version of sphinx for more and
more ports require it and also takes care of the ports require old version. I
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245755
Simeon Simeonov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #213592|0 |1
is obsolete|
Dear port maintainer,
The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your
ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check
each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you
46 matches
Mail list logo
