https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208282
Kubilay Kocak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|ema...@freebsd.org |sbr...@freebsd.org
--- Comment #26
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208282
Kubilay Kocak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|maintainer-feedback?(sbruno |
|@FreeBSD.org),
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208282
Kubilay Kocak changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pyt...@freebsd.org
Assig
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220484
Kubilay Kocak changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.llvm.org/show_
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208282
--- Comment #24 from commit-h...@freebsd.org ---
A commit references this bug:
Author: sbruno
Date: Thu Aug 3 00:56:08 UTC 2017
New revision: 447189
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/447189
Log:
Add a code block for the qe
Hi!
> I noticed that there is a numpy port for Python2.7 in the Ports Collection,
> but none for Python3.x. I tried installing numpy via pip3 for Python3.6
> (from the Ports Collection), but I got a lot of Fortran related errors and
> the end result was a build failure. Are there any efforts to pr
Good Evening,
I noticed that there is a numpy port for Python2.7 in the Ports Collection,
but none for Python3.x. I tried installing numpy via pip3 for Python3.6
(from the Ports Collection), but I got a lot of Fortran related errors and
the end result was a build failure. Are there any efforts to
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208282
--- Comment #23 from commit-h...@freebsd.org ---
A commit references this bug:
Author: sbruno
Date: Wed Aug 2 17:58:04 UTC 2017
New revision: 447129
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/447129
Log:
Add a code block for the qe
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220484
--- Comment #6 from Dimitry Andric ---
So this was known upstream as https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26803, and
has been fixed in https://reviews.llvm.org/rL263301.
Since 11-STABLE now has clang 4.0.0, and head has 5.0.0, which both
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221116
--- Comment #8 from Marcelo Araujo ---
I'm ok with the patch, you can go ahead and commit it, approved by myself.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221116
Michael Gmelin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|maintainer-feedback?(kmoore |maintainer-feedback?(araujo
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220596
Matthew Seaman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #184957||maintainer-approval?(roberf
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220596
Matthew Seaman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #184232|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220596
--- Comment #25 from commit-h...@freebsd.org ---
A commit references this bug:
Author: matthew
Date: Wed Aug 2 14:07:49 UTC 2017
New revision: 447104
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/447104
Log:
A package-based, source co
On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 11:11:17AM +0100, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
> Le 01/08/2017 à 00:36, Steve Kargl a écrit :
> > Any chance that the patch will be added to lang/python27?
> >
>
> Is there a PR so that it does not get lost ?
>
A search for 'python' returns 83 open/new PR's. None
seem to addres
Le 01/08/2017 à 00:36, Steve Kargl a écrit :
> Any chance that the patch will be added to lang/python27?
>
Is there a PR so that it does not get lost ?
--
Mathieu Arnold
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Dear port maintainer,
The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your
ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check
each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you
17 matches
Mail list logo
