bootloader in python.

2016-06-29 Thread Alfred Perlstein
Josh Triplett started out with "the punchline" for his PyCon 2015 talk on porting Python to run without an operating system: he and his Intel colleagues got the interpreter to run in the GRUB boot loader for either BIOS or EFI systems. But that didn't spoil the rest of the talk by any means. He

[Bug 210685] [exp-run] lang/python27: Update to 2.7.12

2016-06-29 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210685 Antoine Brodin changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|pyt...@freebsd.org |port...@freebsd.org --- Comment #

FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date

2016-06-29 Thread portscout
Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you

Re: The good supplier for mould and products

2016-06-29 Thread Paul
Hello python, Nice day! We are one of the manufacturers for injection mold and injection molding , metal mould and relevant metal products.rubber products. If you have any new project for this kind of the products, we would like to establish the good and long cooperation with you . Pls kin

[Bug 210685] [exp-run] lang/python27: Update to 2.7.12

2016-06-29 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210685 --- Comment #8 from Kubilay Kocak --- (In reply to Antoine Brodin from comment #7) We technically don't need to (nor have we) exp-run Python ports on each update. exp-run ? was only set as a candidate/option, and it can be removed If comb

[Bug 210685] [exp-run] lang/python27: Update to 2.7.12

2016-06-29 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210685 --- Comment #7 from Antoine Brodin --- (In reply to Kubilay Kocak from comment #6) it's faster for portmgr to do 1 exp-run not 2 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___

[Bug 210636] devel/py-setuptools: Update to 23.1.0 (and exp-run)

2016-06-29 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210636 Kubilay Kocak changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://bugs.freebsd.org/bu

[Bug 210685] [exp-run] lang/python27: Update to 2.7.12

2016-06-29 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210685 Kubilay Kocak changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[exp-run] lang/python27 |[exp-run] lang/python27:

[Bug 210685] [exp-run] lang/python27 update to 2.7.12 and devel/py-setuptools update to 23.1.0

2016-06-29 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210685 Kubilay Kocak changed: What|Removed |Added CC||br...@freebsd.org Assign

[Bug 208282] lang/python*: Packages fails on arm due to variable in _sysconfigdata.py

2016-06-29 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208282 --- Comment #11 from Emmanuel Vadot --- I don't know if it's easily doable on a higher level, I don't know the port infrastructure. I've put it here because it's simple and since there is already stuff done in every python port Makefile I g

[Bug 210636] devel/py-setuptools: Update to 23.1.0 (and exp-run)

2016-06-29 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210636 --- Comment #10 from Vladimir Krstulja --- (In reply to Wen Heping from comment #6) As far as I'm concerned yes, I'm not a committer so it's your hands now, guys. ;) Though I do agree with Koobs, it'd be best if the issues were separate, i

[Bug 210636] devel/py-setuptools: Update to 23.1.0 (and exp-run)

2016-06-29 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210636 Vladimir Krstulja changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #171936|0 |1 is patch|

[Bug 208282] lang/python*: Packages fails on arm due to variable in _sysconfigdata.py

2016-06-29 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208282 --- Comment #10 from Kubilay Kocak --- (In reply to Emmanuel Vadot from comment #9) Could this be done in python.mk or at a higher level than in individual ports? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 210636] devel/py-setuptools: Update to 23.1.0 (and exp-run)

2016-06-29 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210636 --- Comment #9 from Wen Heping --- (In reply to Kubilay Kocak from comment #8) Patch for py-sqlite3 is not from upstream but from me. wen -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___

[Bug 208282] lang/python*: Packages fails on arm due to variable in _sysconfigdata.py

2016-06-29 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208282 --- Comment #9 from Emmanuel Vadot --- When cross-builing python with qemu-static the compiler is /nxb-bin/usr/bin/cc and python save this value for compiling module after. /nxb-bin/ doesn't exists on arm image (or mips or whatever). If I w

[Bug 210636] devel/py-setuptools: Update to 23.1.0 (and exp-run)

2016-06-29 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210636 --- Comment #8 from Kubilay Kocak --- @Wen: Also, did the change to sqlite3 come from upstream and is it a known issue? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. __

[Bug 210636] devel/py-setuptools: Update to 23.1.0 (and exp-run)

2016-06-29 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210636 --- Comment #7 from Kubilay Kocak --- (In reply to Wen Heping from comment #6) I'd prefer to keep the updates separate (one for python, the other for setuptools) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 208282] lang/python*: Packages fails on arm due to variable in _sysconfigdata.py

2016-06-29 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208282 --- Comment #8 from Kubilay Kocak --- I'm a little confused. If it's not a bug in Python and expected behaviour, why are changes being made in lang/python*? Is a ".if ${CC} == /nxb-bin/usr/bin/cc" block also required for every other langu

[Bug 210685] [exp-run] lang/python27 update to 2.7.12 and devel/py-setuptools update to 23.1.0

2016-06-29 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210685 Wen Heping changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|pyt...@freebsd.org |port...@freebsd.org -- You are recei

[Bug 210636] devel/py-setuptools: Update to 23.1.0 (and exp-run)

2016-06-29 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210636 --- Comment #6 from Wen Heping --- I have filed another PR/210685 which inlucde the update of lang/python and devel/py-setuptools. Krstulja, can I close this PR ? wen -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for th

[Bug 210685] [exp-run] lang/python27 update to 2.7.12 and devel/py-setuptools update to 23.1.0

2016-06-29 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210685 Bug ID: 210685 Summary: [exp-run] lang/python27 update to 2.7.12 and devel/py-setuptools update to 23.1.0 Product: Ports & Packages Version: Latest Hardware: Any

maintainer-feedback requested: [Bug 210685] [exp-run] lang/python27 update to 2.7.12 and devel/py-setuptools update to 23.1.0

2016-06-29 Thread bugzilla-noreply
Wen Heping has reassigned Bugzilla Automation 's request for maintainer-feedback to FreeBSD Python : Bug 210685: [exp-run] lang/python27 update to 2.7.12 and devel/py-setuptools update to 23.1.0 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210685 --- Description --- Created attachment 1719