On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 07:46:14AM +0200, David Naylor wrote:
> On Tuesday, 28 July 2015 22:05:54 Bart??omiej Rutkowski wrote:
> > I've checked how linux does it and it seems they're (at least Debian)
> doing
> > static linking - that would fix the issue, whatever it is. Can you adjust
> > the por
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201077
--- Comment #2 from Antoine Brodin ---
I have updated the patch in review D2955
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
freebsd-python@freebsd.org mailing
On Tuesday, 28 July 2015 22:05:54 Bartłomiej Rutkowski wrote:
> I've checked how linux does it and it seems they're (at least Debian)
doing
> static linking - that would fix the issue, whatever it is. Can you adjust
> the port to do the static instead of dynamic linking binary?
```
# cd /usr/loca
On Tuesday, 28 July 2015 17:08:37 Bryan Drewery wrote:
> On 7/28/15 11:46 AM, David Naylor wrote:
> > Why would the shared library be found when using a relative path
but not
> > when using an absolute path? Is this a bug in FreeBSD?
>
> What is the output for readelf?
>
> readelf -d `which pyp
On 7/28/15 11:46 AM, David Naylor wrote:
> Why would the shared library be found when using a relative path but not
> when using an absolute path? Is this a bug in FreeBSD?
What is the output for readelf?
readelf -d `which pypy`|grep -i libr
--
Regards,
Bryan Drewery
I've checked how linux does it and it seems they're (at least Debian) doing
static linking - that would fix the issue, whatever it is. Can you adjust
the port to do the static instead of dynamic linking binary?
Kind regards,
Bartek Rutkowski
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 7:46 PM, David Naylor wrote:
Hi Hackers,
I am busy simplifying the lang/pypy port (see
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D3209) however I have uncovered a rather
strange problem:
## BACKGROUND ##
PyPy has it's own directory layout so we install it into $PREFIX/pypy-2.6. In
there is everything pypy needs including bin/pypy (the
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201907
--- Comment #11 from mhja...@swbell.net ---
(In reply to Ruslan Makhmatkhanov from comment #10)
I don't object at all. I'm glad to see these ports are still useful!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the b
