Hi,
> [2013/11/21 William Grzybowski ]
> The conclusion is that there are issues to fix in setuptools like
> easy-install.pth.
Do you mean errors such as
/usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/easy-install.pth: No such file
or directory?
(see for example
http://package19.nyi.freebsd.org/bulk/91
On 11/21/2013 12:52, William Grzybowski wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 9:48 AM, John Marino
> wrote:
>> On 11/11/2013 16:22, William Grzybowski wrote:
>> Hi William,
>> It appears this exp-run was performed a week ago
>> (http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=183726).
>>
>> What's the conc
Synopsis: math/py-numpy gcc-aux libgfortran.so.3 issue
State-Changed-From-To: feedback->closed
State-Changed-By: linimon
State-Changed-When: Thu Nov 21 19:25:56 UTC 2013
State-Changed-Why:
Closed at submitter's request.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=184135
__
The following reply was made to PR ports/184135; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Byron Young
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, b...@bkyoung.com
Cc:
Subject: Re: ports/184135: math/py-numpy gcc-aux libgfortran.so.3 issue
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 10:30:51 -0800
Suspected this came from lang/gnat re
Synopsis: lang/python32 fails to build _posixsubprocess module on FreeBSD 10.0
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->freebsd-python
Responsible-Changed-By: edwin
Responsible-Changed-When: Thu Nov 21 13:10:07 UTC 2013
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Over to maintainer (via the GNATS Auto Assig
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 9:48 AM, John Marino wrote:
> On 11/11/2013 16:22, William Grzybowski wrote:
>> We are aware of the issue.
>>
>> --record option from setup.py is registering a directory whereas it
>> should not. It is believed the update from distribute to setuptools
>> will fix this issue
On 11/11/2013 16:22, William Grzybowski wrote:
> We are aware of the issue.
>
> --record option from setup.py is registering a directory whereas it
> should not. It is believed the update from distribute to setuptools
> will fix this issue, but it is pending an exp-run ports/183726.
>
Hi William
Dear FreeBSD port maintainer:
As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in
the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically schedule removal of ports
that have been judged to have outlived their usefulness. Often,
this is due to a better alternative having become available and/or
the