On 23.08.2012 21:47, Eitan Adler wrote:
NOT and ONLY are meant for ports which by definition will never work
another arch (think x86info). In this case the ports are just broken.
That's a fine distinction, that makes little sense to me -- the total
number of ports, which can not ever work on so
On Thu, 23 Aug 2012, Mark Linimon wrote:
> FYI, I would like your approval on these (just the commit of BROKEN; I
> do not expect you to try to fix them).
>
> ger...@freebsd.orglang/gcc42
For lang/gcc42 I just added arm to NOT_FOR_ARCHS.
On Thu, 23 Aug 2012, Eitan Adler wrote:
> NOT and ONLY
