Re: The state of packages based on Python ports

2012-02-01 Thread Paul Hoffman
On Feb 1, 2012, at 3:55 PM, Mark Linimon wrote: > On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 07:53:41AM -0800, Paul Hoffman wrote: >> HOWEVER, it doesn't answer the question of packages for 3.x. Is the >> policy "there can be (mostly) only one set of packages for Python >> modules, and that is for the preferred vers

Re: The state of packages based on Python ports

2012-02-01 Thread Mark Linimon
On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 07:53:41AM -0800, Paul Hoffman wrote: > HOWEVER, it doesn't answer the question of packages for 3.x. Is the > policy "there can be (mostly) only one set of packages for Python > modules, and that is for the preferred version"? It's a code limitation rather than policy. We

Re: The state of packages based on Python ports

2012-02-01 Thread Paul Hoffman
On Jan 31, 2012, at 9:18 PM, Mark Linimon wrote: > On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 05:37:54PM -0800, Paul Hoffman wrote: >> ftp.freebsd.org: /pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-8.2-release/All > > We don't update ports in the *-release directories once the release > has been cut. Thanks, that makes good