Re: [CFI] About Python3+ libraries

2009-07-06 Thread Li-Wen Hsu
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 17:14, Daichi GOTO wrote: > Easy and non-impact solution is to add ports with > py3- prefix I guess. For example, right now I want to > python3 verion x11-toolkits/py-tkinter. I think it is reasonable. I will add databases/py25-bsddb soon, for mail/py-spambayes using, which

Re: ports/136379: www/py-utidy not 64-bit clean

2009-07-06 Thread edwin
Synopsis: www/py-utidy not 64-bit clean Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->freebsd-python Responsible-Changed-By: edwin Responsible-Changed-When: Mon Jul 6 12:30:12 UTC 2009 Responsible-Changed-Why: freebsd-python@ wants this port PRs (via the GNATS Auto Assign Tool) http://www.fre

Current problem reports assigned to freebsd-python@FreeBSD.org

2009-07-06 Thread FreeBSD bugmaster
Note: to view an individual PR, use: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=(number). The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and obsolete releases. S Tracker

[CFI] About Python3+ libraries

2009-07-06 Thread Daichi GOTO
Hi python ports folks, I want to know your ideas and suggestions. Right now, there are 2 major python branches, python 2.x and 3.x. Most ports uses python 2.x as their supported version python. But for i18n user, python 3+ is better than python 2.x, at least for me. So I'm developing some too