Re: ports/136283: commit references a PR

2009-07-03 Thread dfilter service
The following reply was made to PR ports/136283; it has been noted by GNATS. From: dfil...@freebsd.org (dfilter service) To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org Cc: Subject: Re: ports/136283: commit references a PR Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 15:17:51 + (UTC) wxs 2009-07-03 15:17:42 UTC FreeB

Re: ports/136283: [update] net/py-libnet : Update to 1.1

2009-07-03 Thread wxs
Synopsis: [update] net/py-libnet : Update to 1.1 State-Changed-From-To: open->closed State-Changed-By: wxs State-Changed-When: Fri Jul 3 15:17:51 UTC 2009 State-Changed-Why: Committed. Thanks! http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=136283 ___ freeb

Re: ports/136283: [update] net/py-libnet : Update to 1.1

2009-07-03 Thread edwin
Synopsis: [update] net/py-libnet : Update to 1.1 Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->freebsd-python Responsible-Changed-By: edwin Responsible-Changed-When: Fri Jul 3 13:50:22 UTC 2009 Responsible-Changed-Why: freebsd-python@ wants this port PRs (via the GNATS Auto Assign Tool) http:

Re: [RFC] lang/python30 (and lang/python*) fixes

2009-07-03 Thread Andrew MacIntyre
Li-Wen Hsu wrote: On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 22:57:14 +1000, Andrew MacIntyre wrote: Given the experimental nature of Python 3.0, and the fact that 3.1 is out, it seems to me that Python 3.0's time in the ports collection should not be extended. Yes. But as long as we do not set Python 3.0 as t