I am writing a port for cinelerra and to grab the source you must get it
from the git repo that they have. so the software doesn't have a version so
to speak.
Should I use the version from the installed version after I install
cinelerra for the portversion and just tar it up?
_
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 3:09 PM, Pietro Cerutti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> Chuck Swiger wrote:
> | On Oct 27, 2008, at 11:55 AM, Pietro Cerutti wrote:
> |> |> Should I use the version from the installed version after I install
> |> |> cineler
On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 2:14 AM, Yuriy Grishin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Hello,
>
> More than 2 weeks ago I tried to take maintainership of www/sams because it
> hasn't been updated for a long time.
> Current state : feedback. (but I've sent the file)
> Could somebody please explain me what wrong
Since I come across a few applications that don't use imake, gmake, or a
configure script. How do I make these third party build systems work for the
port system. For example one port I been playing around with is jam which is
used to build a certain application.
___
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 5:55 PM, Guido Falsi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> matt donovan wrote:
>
>> Since I come across a few applications that don't use imake, gmake, or a
>> configure script. How do I make these third party build systems work for
>> the
>
ou know when 2.0.64 will
be available in the ports tree or have any other suggestion that will
help solve this issue?
Thanks, Matt
MarkeTrends, inc.
[More]
I
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-po
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 5:06 PM, William Palfreman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> 2008/11/24 Volker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > On 11/24/08 19:55, William Palfreman wrote:
> >> 2008/11/23 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >>> Synopsis: [vuxml] [patch] update audio/streamripper to 1.64.0, fix
> CVE-2008-4829
> >>
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 8:05 AM, Naram Qashat wrote:
> Dominic Fandrey wrote:
>
>> There is no firefox3 support in bsd.gecko.mk. This seems to keep
>> plugins and add-ons that would work in Firefox 3 as well from being
>> ported.
>>
>
> As far as I understand, plugins for any Mozilla products are
On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 8:37 PM, Sevan / Venture37 wrote:
> Hi Guys
> Trying to build a FreeSBIE with MINIMAL=YES defined causes the buildworld
> process to bomb out, below is the output from the log file, any ideas??
>
>
>
> -
>
> >>> st
On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 9:55 AM, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote:
> Hello,
> I don't exactly have any use for the port palm/pdbc, but why is it
> marked broken?
> The commit says checksum mismatch, but if I remove the BROKEN line
> from Makefile, it checks out fine here:
>
> r...@kg-v2# port test
> ===>
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 3:42 PM, Albert Thiel wrote:
> Whoever manages BIND..
>
> SANS has a new warning/listing on BIND (Jan 7th) that may effect FreeBSD's
> implementation, but I am
> not sure... I'm just the mailman here :)
>
> http://isc.sans.org/diary.html?storyid=5641&rss
>
> I checked versi
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 8:11 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>
> I am reading pkg_info(1), I see that pkg_info can be executed without
> any options/arguments, but the man page doesn't tell what happens in
> this case.
>
> In practice I see that configure.kde3 executes pkg_info in the above
> fashion (af
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 10:07 AM, Olivier Mueller wrote:
> Hello,
>
> After an upgrade from FreeBSD 7.0 to 7.1 (with freebsd-update in my
> case), is it required to recompile all ports (portupgrade -af) like
> specified in some docs/blog-entries, or is it not *really* necessary?
> What are you doi
On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 9:51 AM, Peter Ulrich Kruppa wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just tried to install java/linux-sun-jdk16 . The required file
> jdk-6u10-linux-i586.bin isn't available anymore. Latest version would be
> jdk-6u12-linux-i586.bin .
>
> Greetings
>
> Uli.
>
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 9:20 PM, Lars Eighner wrote:
>
>
> Xorg upgrade (gory details follow) went south. I must have a working
> graphics browser by Monday. This is pretty much *vital*, as in a matter of
> survival.
>
> What is the fastest and/or surest way to get a platform that will run
> fire
>
>
> I go to /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/pango and run make config and I get No
> options to configure.
>
> If anyone can help, I would appreciate it.
>
> Kind Regards
> Brent Clark
>
>
> Pango has cairo support by default since it is a lib_depend for pango on
FreeBSD
_
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 10:31 PM, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 12:48:09PM +0100, Stefan Bethke wrote:
> >> The update still remains broken:
> >> [r...@portjail ~]$ echo $(uname)
> >> -bash: command substitution: line 25: syntax error near unexpected token
> >> `)'
> >> -bash: co
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 6:22 PM, Marco Bröder wrote:
> On Tue March 24 2009 22:47:28 Doug Barton wrote:
> > Marco, I think you misunderstood what Chuck said. The term "attaboy"
> > is an English colloquialism that means roughly "congratulations for a
> > job well done." What Chuck is saying is th
I been thinking about making it but if someone already started I won't I
just not had the time at the moment to start it since it'll be good to have
in the port tree even if it needs a java installed to bootstrap it
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing l
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 12:41 AM, Peter Ulrich Kruppa
wrote:
> matt donovan schrieb:
>
>> I been thinking about making it but if someone already started I won't I
>> just not had the time at the moment to start it since it'll be good to
>> have
>>
2009/3/30 Sergei Vyshenski
> Hi,
>
> After updating of ClamAV to ver. 0.95, got problems with compiling
> of mail/p5-Mail-ClamAV-0.20_5 (please see listing below).
>
>
Port needs updated to 0.22nb1 to work correctly I do believe with later
version of clamav.
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 6:22 PM, Mark Linimon wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 01:13:46PM -0400, Chuck Robey wrote:
> > I need to understand why all support for XFree86 has been removed from
> > our ports.
>
> Because no one volunteered to do the work to support it.
>
> At any given time there ar
>
>
> I don't know git anywhere's near as well as I know cvs, but it seems to me
> that
> xorg doesn't have any TAGS so you can't ask for a particular release, isn't
> that
> true? I think that is probably a comment on git, not Xorg. I guess,
> seeing
> that there's about 1/4 the amount of work
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 6:28 PM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> I need to package MPC (http://www.multiprecision.org/mpc/) which
> is going to become a prerequisite of GCC 4.5.
>
> In principle that should be simple, except that we already have
> ports/audio/mpc which is something quite different. Any t
when I try to compile the dsniff port it fails at linking. Sorry about
the long paste in this email but I sent this to the maintainer as
well.
cc -o dsniff asn1.o base64.o buf.o hex.o magic.o mount.o pcaputil.o rpc.o tcp_r
aw.o trigger.o record.o dsniff.o decode.o decode_aim.o decode_citrix.o dec
On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 5:24 PM, Sofian Brabez wrote:
> Hello matt,
>
> Indeed dsniff doesn't compile anymore, I see an update of libnids by roam@
> yesterday [1]. As dsniff depends of libnids to compile, I think the
> problem come from libnids update.
>
> I will invest
On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 5:24 PM, Sofian Brabez wrote:
> Hello matt,
>
> Indeed dsniff doesn't compile anymore, I see an update of libnids by roam@
> yesterday [1]. As dsniff depends of libnids to compile, I think the
> problem come from libnids update.
>
> I will invest
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 8:55 PM, Josh Rickmar wrote:
> I just noticed that www/firefox-devel was still in the ports tree.
> Looking at the Makefile, this port will install 3.0 alpha 2. Shouldn't
> this port be deleted?
>
> --
> To send me a personal email, please place [personal] in the Subject l
If you look
On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 11:02 AM, cpghost wrote:
> devel/boost is currently at 1.37.0, while the upstream is
> at 1.38.0 (since 2009-02-09 01:36). If you have some time,
> please update the port.
>
> Thank you.
> -cpghost.
>
> --
> Cordula's Web. http://www.cordula.ws/
> _
I just noticed that the ClamAV start/stop scripts on FreeBSD 4.9 include
/etc/rc.subr
which doesn't actually exist. The dependency on 4.9 lives in /usr/local/etc like
everything else that isn't part of the base system.
Just a heads up, I fixed it locally.
--
Matt Sealey <[EM
I have been trying to install the mysql50-server port for the past few
days, and I keep getting a checksum error. My ports tree and index is up
to date. Any ideas?
=> MD5 Checksum mismatch for mysql-5.0.41.tar.gz.
=> SHA256 Checksum mismatch for mysql-5.0.41.tar.gz.
===> Giving up on fetchin
mpile and install the library for a particular (more than one) version
of Python?
Thanks,
Matt.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
ere a problem. With a known good auth pair, the server
returns BAD LOGIN. The server also no longer supports LOGIN, only accepting
clear text. Rolling back cures this immediately with no change
in /etc/pam.d/pop3.
Any suggestions?
--
Matt Dawson.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MTD15-RIPE OpenNIC M_D9
MD51-
here and can't really test my theory on a production server. The server does
not validate usernames immediately (it accepts an invalid username with
a "+OK username accepted, password please" on the working version), so
perhaps acceptance of a valid username is a red herring.
--
Matt
ks
fine. Thank you for looking into this for us.
--
Matt Dawson.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MTD15-RIPE OpenNIC M_D9
MD51-6BONE
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Hello,
I am attempting to update to the latest graphics/GraphicsMagick port. The build
succeeds, but staging fails and I have not been able to find a way to make it
work. Below is the output of the stage command.
-- m@
# uname -a
FreeBSD x24.msqr.us 9.2-RELEASE-p7 FreeBSD 9.2-RELEASE-p7 #0: Tu
igs differ
from the defaults that are used to build binary packages?
Thanks in advance.
Matt
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
What does the "+" mean in the config dialogs that appear while building
ports? Does it indicate a setting that's checked by default, or a
recommendation, or ...?
Thanks for your help.
Matt
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org ma
Ah, thanks.
Matt
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 8:17 AM, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> On 10/01/14 16:01, Matt Reimer wrote:
> > What does the "+" mean in the config dialogs that appear while building
> > ports? Does it indicate a setting that's checked by default, or a
>
ational Ispell Version 3.1.20 (but really Aspell 0.60.6.1)
helo this is a tset
& helo 11 0: he lo, he-lo, hello, helot, help, halo, hell, held, helm,
hero, he'll
*
*
*
& tset 5 15: test, stet, Set, Tet, set
It seems to do exactly the same as hunspell like you have been pointed
d before I upgraded.
It could just be an unrelated coincidence, but if it isn't I'm thinking
the default rc order should maybe be changed for these ports?
--
Matt
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/li
On Dec 11 10:51, Matt Smith wrote:
Hi,
I have run Unbound and NSD for a long time and everything was working
fine until the recent 1.5.x update for Unbound. Now if I reboot my
server I get DNSSEC validation errors for my own local domain until I
restart Unbound once again. I believe this is
On Dec 12 12:07, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
+--On 12 décembre 2014 05:00:00 -0600 Scot Hetzel
wrote:
| On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 4:15 AM, Darren Pilgrim
| wrote
|> On 12/11/2014 11:53 PM, Matt Smith wrote:
|>>
|>> Somebody has let me know that I made an obvious mistake in the above. I
you can also re-enable passphrases by stdin if required by adding
allow-loopback-pinentry to .gnupg/gpg-agent.conf and using the
--pinentry-mode=loopback command line switch to gpg.
--
Matt
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.free
options is set it will only drag in a single
dependancy rather than all the X11 libraries and GTK.
--
Matt
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-
onfiguration "set crypt_use_gpgme=yes".
Then it uses a much more sane internal API or something rather than
parsing external commands.
--
Matt
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo
iles were deleted or not installed in the first place. I do
exactly this for NTPd, OpenSSH, and Unbound all of which I use the port
versions for so don't need them in the base system.
--
Matt
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://
On Jan 14 13:30, Michelle Sullivan wrote:
Matt Smith wrote:
Doug Barton who used to maintain BIND in both the base system and the
port used to always say that the version in the base system was only
designed to be used as a local resolver on a laptop/desktop. If it was
used as a proper DNS
nk and at least wait and see what people
make of OpenSSL 1.1 after a few months if only for the fact it's a bit
of a pain to switch back again by recompiling everything.
--
Matt
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd
> /usr/local/lib/libssl.so.39 (0x801aca000)
Most likely because I have correctly declared the default version of the
SSL library by putting DEFAULT_VERSIONS=ssl=libressl-devel in make.conf.
Without declaring it specifically like that I wouldn't tr
On Oct 27 16:22, Matt Smith wrote:
I don't see this on my system which is FreeBSD 11.0-STABLE #0 r307132
$ ldd /usr/local/sbin/ntpd | grep -E '(crypto|ssl)'
libcrypto.so.38 => /usr/local/lib/libcrypto.so.38 (0x800cee000)
libssl.so.39 => /usr/local/lib/libssl.so.39 (0x801ac
freebsd package build clusters use
and is more designed for that type of usage. Worth taking a look.
It's a shame the handbook hasn't been updated to give this information.
Matt
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org
having the system compile it twice? If you use -m
src=/usr/src then it will just use the already built STABLE world from
your host build. Easy way to make it synced to the live system. And
poudriere jail -u still works fine to update it.
--
Matt
_
2 situation where virtually nobody is
writing python3 code.
I'm not going to argue against what you guys are asking for, each to
their own, you have your own requirements and that's fair enough. But I
just wanted to make a point that th
Maybe there is some way to tell Java to limit
the number of open files?
Yuri
I would take a look at /usr/local/etc/poudriere.conf at the MAX_FILES
setting.
--
Matt
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/l
ight also be related to the CONSERVATIVE_UPGRADE setting of
pkg.conf. According to the man page:
CONSERVATIVE_UPGRADE: boolean
Ensure in multi repository mode that the priority is
given as much as possible to the repository where a
package was first installed from. Default: YES.
--
Matt
_
a good site for looking at this.
http://www.freshports.org/
If you search for something it tells you what is build and what is run.
Alternatively you can look at the ports Makefile for lines such as
BUILD_DEPENDS, RUN_DEPENDS, LIB_DEPENDS etc.
--
Matt
__
ailed to install without missing something?
Synth runs faster and more gracefully than portmaster, but portmaster installed
everything that it built.
Tom
Maybe something along the lines of pkg install -g * ? I'm not sure, but
-g lets you do a glob pattern.
themselves I know
it will work.
For example we are shortly getting flavors support in the ports tree. I
think the author of synth has already said he is not going to support
this whereas poudriere will straight away.
--
Matt
___
freebsd-ports@f
nd
do it in one command rather than two but then you're building everything
on the host system and not a specific list. Also I like the extra pkg
stage, it gives me a chance to see what pkg is about to do and abort it
if it wants to do something insane.
--
Matt
__
a
hugely cut down list.
I then occasionally run poudriere options -n -j jailname -f optlist so
that it non-recursively only gives me a dialog for the ports with
non-default options.
--
Matt
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.f
host system buildworld/kernel. It doesn't need to be rebuilt.
--
Matt
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
cho "${V1} ${V2}" > ${JV}
echo "${JV} set to ${V1} ${V2}"
--
Matt
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
ply upgraded it then you can likely completely ignore all
of these notes and instead you should take note of anything that is
written in /usr/ports/UPDATING which relates to upgrades for your
specific packages.
--
Matt
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mai
would greatly miss HTTP_DAV_EXT. Because for some
inexplicable reason they won't put this functionality in the core DAV.
I've also used HTTP_GEOIP2 in the past for a couple of things, but I
wouldn't miss this one quite as much
On Mar 07 09:17, The Doctor wrote:
What are the hold ups for Dovecot 2.3 ?
You, constantly asking this list why they haven't upgraded any ports to
the latest versions but not actually providing any patches yourself to
help the volunteers do this more quickly.
--
Lupe Christoph wrote:
Matt Craig wrote:
-
You need a group "munin".
Would you like me to create it [y]? y
Done.
Initializing new plugins..done.
./+INSTALL: /usr
port. Is it built-in on
6.0 or 7.0 or something?
--
Matt Sealey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Manager, Genesi, Developer Relations
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
. Note the two slashes between the two iterations of the MANPREFIX.
Any clues, folks? I'd like to get these updates in before the ports tree is
frozen for 6.2 if at all possible.
--
Matt Dawson.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MTD15-RIPE OpenNIC M_D9
MD51-6BONE
Running FreeBSD 6.1 stable
I tried to update php4 this morning and the update fails. I can't find
out exactly why and I have been unable to fix it. Here is the command
used and the complete output:
-
ls-2.01_5
laptop64 ~ $ ls /var/db/pkg | grep hal-
hal-0.5.8.20061217
Burncd works perfectly and cdrecord works if I disable dbus, polkit and hal.
This is across all my systems, so it's not limited to this laptop. if it
matters, I've used both K3B and cdrecord from the command line with the
*:skipped / !:failed)
! mail/exim (exim-4.63) (unknown build error)
---> Packages processed: 0 done, 0 ignored, 0 skipped and 1 failed
Simply recompressing FAQ.txt.bz2 (it was a plain text file as downloaded, just
with a bz2
extension) fixed it, and it all compiled just fine afte
pdate it by hand using portmaster.
Or is there a better way to handle this situation, where I want to use
binary packages where possible and only build when necessary?
Thanks for your help.
Matt
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
That's good news. What should I watch for in order to know when Really Soon
Now becomes Now?
Matt
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 12:14 PM, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> On 14/01/2014 18:52, Chris Rees wrote:
> > Mixing ports and packages is discouraged and can get messy, because
> > upg
Anybody else notice that pkg updating -d has been broken for a while? Or
is it just me?
# grep 2016 /usr/ports/UPDATING | head -4
20160526:
20160525:
20160523:
20160511:
# pkg updating -d 20160523
#
--
Matt
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
On May 26 21:53, Alphons van Werven wrote:
Matt Smith via freebsd-ports wrote:
Anybody else notice that pkg updating -d has been broken for a while? Or
is it just me?
# grep 2016 /usr/ports/UPDATING | head -4
20160526:
20160525:
20160523:
20160511:
# pkg updating -d 20160523
Just to be
Is the project ever going to
look at making LibreSSL the default port, or will that be kept as
OpenSSL for many years to come? I know Bernard has been looking into
that and playing around with LibreSSL in base etc. Just curious what the
official policy is going to be on
On Aug 23 12:19, Roger Marquis wrote:
Matt Smith wrote:
Going slightly off-topic, I'm curious what the opinion is around this
and LibreSSL.
My organization evaluated this a few months ago and after a few diffs
and code reviews decided that libressl was the future. We updated
poudrier
101 - 178 of 178 matches
Mail list logo
