On 27 September 2011 10:18, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 10:28:49AM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote:
> > On 09/27/11 08:35, h h wrote:
> > >Kevin Oberman writes:
> > >
> > >>On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 9:03 PM, Ade Lovett wrote:
> > >>
> > >>>With the advent of the conversion of HEA
I have being having some trouble/fun with miniupnpd, in that it didnt seem
to be inserting the rules into pf ( pfctl -sr -a miniupnpd
). The rdr rules are inserted fine just not the firewall rules at the rules
anchor. I think I have traced the problem down to the port build itself. I
have tested an
cool i was tired so couldnt make the last step, i can confirm removing the
WITH makes the patch get applied
On 12 December 2013 14:34, Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote:
> 11.12.2013 17:00, krad wrote:
>
>> I have being having some trouble/fun with miniupnpd, in that it didnt seem
>&g
quarterly does seem very cautious, maybe a monthly might be a good
alternative. I can understand people being hesitant about latest though. I
guess these are not the people who ask though. Maybe the real answer though
is to have a specific repo for that port for the bleeding edge people much
like
