Is WRKDIR a user- or a port-defined variable? (Re: Screwy behavior in ports framework)

2011-09-13 Thread h h
(redirect from -current@ to -ports@) Erwin Lansing writes: > On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 09:45:05AM +, Thomas Mueller wrote: >> >> >> PORTSDIR=/BETA1/usr/ports >> PACKAGES=/usr/packages >> WRKDIR=workb2 >> # added by use.perl 2011-09-13 02:49:43 >> PERL_VERSION=5.14.1 >> >> Maybe WRKDIR shoul

Re: Upgrade install of x11/bigreqsproto-1.1.1...

2011-09-23 Thread h h
Dave Males writes: > I am upgrading today and have an abort with bigreqsproto-1.1.1, > What should I do? [...] > ===> Configuring for bigreqsproto-1.1.1 [...] > checking for xmlto... /usr/local/bin/xmlto > checking the xmlto version... 0.0.24 > checking for fop... /usr/local/bin/fop > checking f

Re: LDFLAGS support for bsd.port.mk and CPPFLAGS/LDFLAGS cleanup

2011-09-25 Thread h h
Lev Serebryakov writes: > Hello, Dmitry. > You wrote 24 сентября 2011 г., 3:36:14: > >> The patch was committed, LDFLAGS and CPPFLAGS and now handled >> similarily, shouldn't be passed to CONFIGURE_ENV and should be >> altered by += like C/CXXFLAGS. > > devel/dbus could not be built with this co

Re: HEADS UP: ports/ and 10.0-CURRENT

2011-09-26 Thread h h
Kevin Oberman writes: > On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 9:03 PM, Ade Lovett wrote: > >> With the advent of the conversion of HEAD to 10.0-CURRENT and, as to be >> expected, ports/ is going to be essentially unusable for a while. >> >> The issue stems from configure scripts (to choose something completel

Re: HEADS UP: ports/ and 10.0-CURRENT

2011-09-27 Thread h h
Eduardo Morras writes: > At 11:18 27/09/2011, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > >> > Now I understand why some OS vendors have choosen the latin 10 'X' for >> > their tenth version of their operating system ... >> >>At least there will be a long rest after >>the move to 10 is complete.. until FreeBSD 1

Re: HEADS UP: ports/ and 10.0-CURRENT

2011-09-28 Thread h h
"Hartmann, O." writes: > On 09/28/11 09:26, Hartmann, O. wrote: > >> On 09/28/11 15:47, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote: >>> Eitan Adler wrote: >>> 2011/9/27 O. Hartmann : > Now I understand why some OS vendors have choosen the latin > 10 'X' for their tenth version of their operating s

Re: HEADS UP: ports/ and 10.0-CURRENT

2011-09-28 Thread h h
Garrett Cooper writes: >> >> So if I change /usr/src/sys/conf/newvers.sh to something like vers 9.9 I'm >> not >> going to shoot myself in the foot if I try and update? I would really like to >> avoid downgrading this box.I've altready been bitten once today and had to >> build packages on my ti