On Fri 2006-06-30 (20:44), Donald J. O'Neill wrote:
> pkg_delete portupgrade-whatever the number, pkg_add -r portupgrade. This gets
> you an older version of portupgrade.
>
> I ran into the same problem today. It's a way around the problem until it's
> fixed.
i tried that:
# pkg_delete portup
On Mon 2006-07-03 (05:56), Donald J. O'Neill wrote:
> OK, then you're going to have to get a bit more aggressive. This is what I
> did
> to take care of the problem on my 6.1-STABLE system:
>
> mv /usr/ports/INDEX-6.db --> INDEX-6.db.org
> mv /var/db/pkg/pkgdb.db --> pkgdb.db.org
>
> pkg_delete
On Thu 2006-07-13 (11:43), gareth wrote:
> hi, i tried all've that, but when i get to 'pkgdb -F', this's what it says:
>
> # pkgdb -F
> ---> Checking the package registry database
> [Updating the pkgdb in /var/db/pkg ...
> /var/db/pkg/pkgdb.db:
Hi guys, after messing up an install of rt (request tracker),
and then cleaning up (so I thought), I installed by doing
the following:
cd /usr/ports/www/rt36
make install -DWITH_APACHE2 -DWITH_FASTCGI
which has installed properly, but the package database seems
inconsistent. When I try to fix thi
On Tue 2009-05-19 (23:18), Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
> > # pkgdb -L
> hence one of the common problems. you need to use pkgtools.conf or one
> of the ports that wraps /etc/make.conf and pkgtools.conf into so you
> only have on source. Personally, I find -L usually useless if you
> select any non-
hey guys, our proxy is caching extremely old copies of the ports index
and portaudit databases from freebsd.org. our admins claim that they
cache the following files i need normally:
http://www.FreeBSD.org/ports/auditfile.tbz
http://www.FreeBSD.org/ports/INDEX-6.bz2
since they have no no-cache pr
On Fri 2008-02-22 (21:17), Emanuel Haupt wrote:
> You could host the INDEX file on a mirror running a webserver on a non
> standard port. Then you could add something like this
> to /usr/local/etc/pkgtools.conf:
>
> ENV['MASTER_SITE_INDEX'] = "http://your.index.mirror.tld:81/";
thanx
> Although
On Fri 2008-02-22 (21:59), RW wrote:
> Have you tried using curl to prefetch the relevant files, IIRC it adds
> a header that asks for a refetch or revalidation. That may cause the
> cache to update its copy, depending on whether their policy complies
> with standards.
i haven't tried that, not re
hey guys, i can't see a similar question recently so i wonder if
i've done something wrong? i've noticed for about 2 weeks that
things seem to be out've sync:
if i do a cvsup with either host=cvsup.FreeBSD.org or cvsup2.FreeBSD.org
and then a portsdb (even after removing /usr/ports/INDEX-6*)
'por
On Tue 2007-08-14 (17:47), Kris Kennaway wrote:
> Are you cvsupping with a fixed tag?
nope, this's my conf:
$ cat /etc/cvsup.conf
*default tag=.
*default host=cvsup2.FreeBSD.org
*default prefix=/usr
*default base=/var/db
*default release=cvs delete use-rel-suffix compress
ports-all
On Wed 2007-08-15 (01:44), RW wrote:
> Given that no-one else is complaining, and it's a single url, the most
> likely explanation for "Database too old" is that your system clock is
> set to the wrong date.
hi, i use ntpd (just checked again, the date/time is normal).
On Tue 2007-08-14 (17:47), Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > similarly for portaudit:
> >
> > # portaudit -F
> > auditfile.tbz 100% of 43 kB 1016 kBps
> > portaudit: Database too old.
> > Old database restored.
> > portaudit: Download failed.
>
> That's bizarre because po
hey guys, i'm struggling to find out how to do this, for example from
the help page:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/ports-using.html
# cd /usr/ports/sysutils/lsof
# make
>> lsof_4.57D.freebsd.tar.gz doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/.
>> Attempting to fetch
On Thu 2006-11-09 (16:08), Kay Abendroth wrote:
> You could run portupgrade|portinstall -F to fetch only.
> So, if you don't have lsof installed you would type:
>
> portinstall -F sysutils/lsof && portinstall sysutils/lsof
>
> And to upgrade a lot of installed ports:
>
> portupgrade
On Sun 2006-12-03 (22:04), Kris Kennaway wrote:
> Let's move this to the correct mailing list (note reply-to)...
sure, the original question then since we've moved lists:
On Mon 2006-12-04 (04:21), gareth wrote:
> hi, portupgrade doesn't seem to be doing anythin
On Sun 2006-12-03 (22:30), Kris Kennaway wrote:
> Those versions are all a couple of weeks stale, so I guess your ports
> tree really isn't up-to-date.
strange, thanx, am trying another mirror ..
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.fr
On Mon 2006-12-04 (05:42), gareth wrote:
> strange, thanx, am trying another mirror ..
yup, our country's mirror wasn't up to date.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsu
On Mon 2006-12-04 (00:23), Kris Kennaway wrote:
> OK, good to know. Can you report further details to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
will do.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any
hi, i have phpbb-2.0.21 installed, and see version 2.0.22 is ready to
be upgraded to by portupgrade. i've never been through an upgrade of
phpBB and was wondering what exactly portupgrade does?
i see i can add the code changes from 2.0.21 to 2.0.22 for the webpages
from phpbb.com, which i will do
On Fri 2006-12-29 (05:29), LI Xin wrote:
> gareth wrote:
> > hi, i have phpbb-2.0.21 installed, and see version 2.0.22 is ready to
> > be upgraded to by portupgrade. i've never been through an upgrade of
> > phpBB and was wondering what exactly portupgrade does?
> &g
hi, portupgrade just upgraded phpbb-2.0.22 to phpbb-2.0.22_1.
it used phpBB-2.0.22.tar.bz2 from www.phpbb.com (same as before),
and as far as i can tell the .php files are the same (and naturally
the database is untouched). does anyone know what this upgrade
was meant to achieve?
- gareth
On Wed 2007-01-24 (19:51), Gordon Stratton wrote:
> On 1/24/07, gareth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >hi, portupgrade just upgraded phpbb-2.0.22 to phpbb-2.0.22_1.
> >it used phpBB-2.0.22.tar.bz2 from www.phpbb.com (same as before),
> >and as far as i can tell the .
On Thu 2007-02-01 (23:24), LI Xin wrote:
> > ah, thanx for the link. so this's the only thing that changed? :
> >
> > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/www/phpbb/files/Attic/security-patch-includes-sessions.php?annotate=1.2
>
> Yes. The only change is that the patch is removed and PORT
On Sat 2006-02-11 (23:24), Rob B wrote:
> I'm having all sorts of bother trying to build anything related to xorg.
>
> Seems as though imake has it's knickers in a twist:
>
> ===> Applying FreeBSD patches for xorg-libraries-6.9.0
> /bin/cp
> /usr/ports/x11/xorg-libraries/files/nls-Compose-micro
On Thu 2007-03-01 (20:27), gareth wrote:
> On Sat 2006-02-11 (23:24), Rob B wrote:
> i've deinstalled and rebuilt imake but the same error comes up. is it
> safe to set FORCE_PKG_REGISTER? would that even make a difference since
> reinstalling doesn't?
woa, sorry looks like
On Sun 2007-03-04 (19:26), Uwe Grohnwaldt wrote:
> > For the error "lookbehind assertion is not fixed length" or
> > "lookahead..." this will work again after deleting devel/pcre and
> > installing devel/pcre-utf8 instead, afterwards recompile php5-pcre and
> > other dependencies.
> > I have found
On Mon 2007-03-12 (11:28), Karol Kwiatkowski wrote:
> > hi, i've just run into this too. what if devel/pcre-utf8 has now been
> > removed?
>
> devel/pcre now has UTF-8 support enabled by default. Use devel/pcre or,
> if you already have devel/pcre-utf-8 installed, 'portupgrade -o
> devel/pcre pcr
On Mon 2007-03-12 (23:15), Andr? B?hm wrote:
> After the latest patch for pcre utf8 compatibility (php5-pcre-5.2.1_4),
> I still get warnings about "Compilation failed: this version of PCRE is
> not compiled with PCRE_UTF8 support at offset 0" for what looks like any
> pcre-function that uses "u" a
On Tue 2007-03-13 (06:51), Eric wrote:
> >edit /usr/ports/lang/php5/Makefile
> >
> >add --with-pcre-regex to the bottom of CONFIGURE_ARGS:
> >
> >reinstall php5 and php5-pcre
i can confirm that this work, thanx ;) that obviously invokes the bundled
version ..
> Good news! it seems this is fixed
On Tue 2007-03-13 (07:35), Eric wrote:
> yes, it looks like _5 was committed some time this morning and it works.
> Ive updated 3 boxes with it. if you did my earlier trick, you will have
> to update your ports and reinstall php5 so it picks up the changes.
yes php5-pcre-5.2.1_5 works for me too
Hi There,
Any chance of getting the unbound port upgraded to 1.3.4 ?
Thanks
Gareth
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-uns
oot wheel 512 Jul 17 10:19 .
drwxr-xr-x 9 root wheel 512 Jul 17 08:23 ..
drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Jul 17 10:19 perl
Cheers,
Gareth ___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubsc
On Wed 2012-01-04 (02:10), Dino Vliet wrote:
> suddenly I'm facing this quest on freebsd 8. I need to bind my little
> webserver running aolserver to port 80. In the past I was always using port
> 8080 and had my router configured to forward requests on port 80 to the
> server on port 8080. Howe
Hi all, I get the following when I try to run webalizer:
Error: Can't open log file /var/log/XXX (symlink)
which according to the changelog seems to be intended behaviour,
and doesn't seem configurable? How is webalizer's 'Incremental'
processing supposed to be handled other than writing a messy
Hi all, krb5 seems to require the openssl port but doesn't pull
it in at build:
# /usr/local/sbin/kdb5_util create -r XXX -s
/usr/local/lib/libgssrpc.so: Undefined symbol "gss_mech_krb5"
/usr/ports/security/krb5/Makefile:
WITH_OPENSSL_PORT= yes
# pkg_info -r krb5-1.10.3_1
Information for
Hey all, wondering if anyone else's noticed this? After an upgrade
courier-authdaemond starts
fine, but the startup script then claims it isn't running. The script itself
seems fine, and:
# /usr/local/etc/rc.d/courier-authdaemond status
courier_authdaemond is not running.
# cat /var/run/authdaem
On Thu 2016-03-10 (19:17), Walter Schwarzenfeld wrote:
> Makefile
> OPTIONS_DEFAULT=RESSL
>
> RESSL_LIB_DEPENDS= libtls.so:${PORTSDIR}/security/libressl
>
>
> turn option RESSL to off.
I guess this is because it's a few months later but these lines are no
longer in the Makefile? (/
Hi all, postgresql93-server builds fine unless I add krb5 support
(MIT, but doesn't seem to matter). It fails with:
cc -O -pipe -DLDAP_DEPRECATED -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith
-Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wendif-labels -Wmissing-format-attribute
-Wformat-security -fno-strict-alias
38 matches
Mail list logo
