Dixit port bad management

2010-05-02 Thread Tim A
1) I don't understand why the Textproc/Dixit port is so badly managed. The program itself is at version 10.4, while your unprofessional port still stays at version 1.0.1, claiming that the GCC 4.2 compilation is broken. 2) I don't understand either why you don't use Dixit sourceforge RSS feeds

RE: Dixit port bad management

2010-05-03 Thread Tim A
Thank you, Garrett and Rene. If the port is motherless or orphan, I will look into it an fix it during the summer. Tim _ Hotmail & Messenger. Get them on your phone now. http://go.microsoft

RE: Dixit port bad management

2010-05-04 Thread Tim A
anagement > Datum: Mon, 03 May 2010 22:01:27 +0200 > > On Mon, 03 May 2010 21:10:05 +0200 > Rene Ladan wrote: > > > On 03-05-2010 21:00, Garrett Cooper wrote: > > > On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 12:59 PM, Tim A wrote: > > >> > > >> 1) I don't unde

RE: Dixit port bad management

2010-05-04 Thread Tim A
> > >> 4) I don't understand the suprematism attitude of the maintainers > > >> in charge, who don't give a penny on the programs they are suppose > > >> to maintain. They are only interested in the statistics generated > > >> by their unprofessional ports, but not in their quality. QED **

RE: Dixit port bad management

2010-05-10 Thread Tim A
Funny enough, I cannot contribute to this thread anymore, as it appears that only a fraction of the messages in this thread ended in my mail box. I understand this is a deliberate and convenient policy! Tim __