Heimdal 1.5.2 problem

I've just installed the new version of Heimdal, 1.5.2 from ports, and I'm having a problem. As in the past, BerkeleyDB needs to be enabled with make config so that there is a backend. However, I'm still getting the error as if BerkeleyDB was not enabled, and there is no backend support. I've fol

Re: Heimdal 1.5.2 problem

On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 1:15 PM, Matthias Andree wrote: > Am 11.05.2012 04:42, schrieb Robert Simmons: > >> And, this is the version of BerkeleyDB that it compiles and installs >> to satisfy the BDB backend that I enabled during config: >> db41-4.1.25_4 > > Try w

Re: Heimdal 1.5.2 problem

I've determined that there are actually two problems: configure finds the version of BDB that is built into FreeBSD: checking db.h usability... yes checking db.h presence... yes checking for db.h... yes checking db_185.h usability... yes checking db_185.h presence... yes checking for db_185.h... y

Re: Heimdal 1.5.2 problem

On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 5:46 AM, Dewayne Geraghty wrote: > Thanks for the updates Robert. > > I've pursued building heimdal on a custom FreeBSD9-Stable jail built without > crypto (openssl, heimdal,...); and forced the selection of bdb throughout the > range 5 to 41 via the following ports.conf se

Re: Heimdal 1.5.2 problem

On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 12:51 PM, Robert Simmons wrote: > On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 5:46 AM, Dewayne Geraghty > wrote: >> Thanks for the updates Robert. >> >> I've pursued building heimdal on a custom FreeBSD9-Stable jail built without >> crypto (openssl, heimda

Re: Heimdal 1.5.2 problem

On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 8:57 AM, Wesley Shields wrote: > As the person who committed this update I will take responsibility for > seeing this through. Would you mind opening a PR with this patch and CC > both myself and the maintainer so it can be properly tracked. I will > work with both of you t

Re: Heimdal 1.5.2 problem

On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 5:14 PM, Wesley Shields wrote: > On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 03:08:31PM -0400, Robert Simmons wrote: >> On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 8:57 AM, Wesley Shields wrote: >> > As the person who committed this update I will take responsibility for >> > seeing t

Re: Heimdal 1.5.2 problem

On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 8:38 PM, Wesley Shields wrote: > On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 06:29:20PM -0400, Robert Simmons wrote: >> On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 5:14 PM, Wesley Shields wrote: >> > On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 03:08:31PM -0400, Robert Simmons wrote: >> >> On Tue, M

Re: Heimdal 1.5.2 problem

On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 12:56 PM, Wesley Shields wrote: > On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 12:21:54PM -0400, Robert Simmons wrote: >> On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 8:38 PM, Wesley Shields wrote: >> > On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 06:29:20PM -0400, Robert Simmons wrote: >> >> On Tue, M

More Heimdal 1.5.2 port problems

I've found another problem with the port. kadmind and kdc both look for krb5.conf in /usr/local/etc, but kpasswdd and kstash look for it in /etc. This can be fixed with a symlink, but I feel like that's not the best solution. Ultimately, all the heimdal utilities and daemons should be looking in

Re: More Heimdal 1.5.2 port problems

On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 3:22 PM, Robert Simmons wrote: > I've found another problem with the port. > > kadmind and kdc both look for krb5.conf in /usr/local/etc, but > kpasswdd and kstash look for it in /etc.  This can be fixed with a > symlink, but I feel like that

Re: More Heimdal 1.5.2 port problems

On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Robert Simmons wrote: > On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 3:22 PM, Robert Simmons wrote: >> I've found another problem with the port. >> >> kadmind and kdc both look for krb5.conf in /usr/local/etc, but >> kpasswdd and kstash look for it in

Re: More Heimdal 1.5.2 port problems

On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Wesley Shields wrote: > On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 01:58:23PM -0400, Robert Simmons wrote: >> On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 3:22 PM, Robert Simmons wrote: >> > I've found another problem with the port. >> > >> > kadmind and kdc

Re: port unmaintained since 2005? drop it? misc/gpt*

On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 4:31 AM, wrote: > Michael Scheidell wrote: > >> Two unmaintained ports, nothing depends on them, and upstream has >> not updated source since 2004, ftp server unresponsive. >> >> >> (gpt32: misc/gpt also un

Re: port unmaintained since 2005? drop it? misc/gpt*

On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 2:33 AM, b. f. wrote: > On 6/11/12, Michael Scheidell wrote: >> >> >> On 6/10/12 11:14 PM, b. f. wrote: >>> The distribution files are at: >>> >>> ftp://ftp.ncsa.uiuc.edu/aces/gpt/releases >>> >>> and the homepage is: >>> >>> http://grid.ncsa.illinois.edu/gpt/ >>> >>> (And

Re: Skype 4.0

On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 1:08 PM, Jerry wrote: > Skype 4.0 for Linux is now available. Is there any possibility of > getting it ported to FreeBSD? The latest version in ports is only > 2.x. I don't have time to do it right at the moment, but since this is pre-compiled binary software, updating the

Re: Skype 4.0

On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 1:08 PM, Jerry wrote: > Skype 4.0 for Linux is now available. Is there any possibility of > getting it ported to FreeBSD? The latest version in ports is only > 2.x. One last thing. These are the files that you are going to want to patch: ports/net-im/skype/ If you've nev

Re: Skype 4.0

On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 5:11 PM, Rich Neese wrote: > I just wish skype would get off their buts and make a bsd version. time > to break code and make a opensource version That's not the answer. Really, everyone needs to move away from Skype altogether. Use Blink. It is a superior client and it

Re: Skype 4.0

On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 6:06 PM, wrote: > On 06/15/2012 05:25 PM, Robert Simmons wrote: >> >> On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 5:11 PM, Rich Neese  wrote: >>> >>> I just wish skype would get off their buts and make a bsd version. time >>> to break code and mak

Re: Skype 4.0

On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 8:42 PM, Franci Nabalanci wrote: > No, the aswer is Skype still. Why? Because Skype use user of Windows 3.1 to > Windows 7, MAC, Linux... > How many people use FreeBSD? Does FreeBSD user comunicate just with the > other FreeBSD user? Please reread my post to the list. I w

Re: Skype 4.0

On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 9:59 PM, Darren Pilgrim wrote: > On 2012-06-15 14:25, Robert Simmons wrote: >> >> On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 5:11 PM, Rich Neese  wrote: >>> >>> I just wish skype would get off their buts and make a bsd version. time >>> t

Re: Skype 4.0

On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 2:02 AM, Waitman Gobble wrote: > dude like since MS bought it they haven't even released any non-win32 > version. i agree, a different alternative to skype is better, and get your > contacts to join up with that. Huh? "New in this version 4.0": http://www.skype.com/intl

Re: Skype 4.0

On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 2:12 AM, Kevin Oberman wrote: > You might look at ekiga. It is in ports and a standard part of Gnome. > It does sip and also claims to support H.323 conferencing, but I have > not had much success making it work with our H.323 system. I will > admit that I have not tried in

Re: security/openssh-portable line # 82 of rc.d/openssh generates DSA not ECDSA

On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 1:17 PM, J. Hellenthal wrote: > > As stated in the subject > > if [ -f /usr/local/etc/ssh/ssh_host_ecdsa_key ]; then >        echo "You already have a Elliptic Curve DSA host key" \ >                "in /usr/local/etc/ssh/ssh_host_ecdsa_key" >        echo "Skipping protocol

Re: security/openssh-portable line # 82 of rc.d/openssh generates DSA not ECDSA

On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 2:24 PM, J. Hellenthal wrote: > On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 01:46:20PM -0400, Robert Simmons wrote: >> On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 1:17 PM, J. Hellenthal >> wrote: >> > >> > As stated in the subject >> > >> > if [ -f /usr/local/

Build of firefox from ports does not finish

It ends with the following: gmake[5]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/mozilla-release/browser/app/profile/extensions' gmake[4]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/mozilla-release/browser/app' gmake[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/mozilla-release/browse

Python libraries moved

It looks like a port revision made a few hours ago has broken firefox (and most likely a bunch of other ports). In the makefile for firefox, it has the following checks for dependencies: BUILD_DEPENDS= nspr>=4.9.4:${PORTSDIR}/devel/nspr \ nss>=3.14.1:${PORTSDIR}/security/nss \

Re: Python libraries moved

Sorry, what was the change you made? On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 1:10 AM, Martin Wilke wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Sun, Mar 03, 2013 at 12:08:41AM -0500, Robert Simmons wrote: >> It looks like a port revision made a few hours ago has broken fi

Re: Python libraries moved

Ports tree updated, but it is still a problem. I don't see anything that was checked in recently that mentions this problem. On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 1:10 AM, Martin Wilke wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Sun, Mar 03, 2013 at 12:08:41AM -0500, Rob

QT4 Port Installing Too Many Deps

I'm trying to install the quassel port with only the quassel core not any of the client components. I'm running into two problems: 1) Even when I specify the CORE only make option, make still tries to install absolutely everything related to qt4 and X11, the whole kitchen sink. This is the line

Re: [CFT] New dialog for ports

I'm getting the same error after the most recent portsnap update. It looks like this has been added as a default for all "make config" commands now. Perhaps these changes should be backed out so it's not the default for everything? On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 10:39 PM, Steve Wills wrote: > On 03/14

Growing list of required(ish) ports

Are there plans to get the following ports moved into HEAD? 1) ports-mgmt/pkg 2) ports-mgmt/dialog4ports 3) ports-mgmt/portaudit 4) ports-mgmt/portmaster It seems to me like these belong in the base system. Also, is there a reason why dialog4ports's functionality wasn't added to dialog(1) as

Re: Growing list of required(ish) ports

On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 10:45 PM, Bryan Drewery wrote: > On 4/7/2013 8:47 PM, Robert Simmons wrote: >> Are there plans to get the following ports moved into HEAD? >> >> 1) ports-mgmt/pkg >> >> 2) ports-mgmt/dialog4ports >> >> 3) ports-mgmt/portaudit >

Re: Growing list of required(ish) ports

On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 1:11 AM, Kevin Oberman wrote: > On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 8:34 PM, Kimmo Paasiala wrote: >> >> On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 6:19 AM, Robert Simmons >> wrote: >> > On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 10:45 PM, Bryan Drewery >> > wrote: >>

Re: Growing list of required(ish) ports

On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 12:48 PM, Florent Peterschmitt wrote: > Le mardi 09 avril 2013 à 06:09 -0700, Darren Pilgrim a écrit : >> On 2013-04-08 10:22, Florent Peterschmitt wrote: >> > Yep, OpenSSH is tiny enought to keep it in base system. It would be a >> > big loss not to have it by default, secu

Re: Growing list of required(ish) ports

On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 1:11 PM, Florent Peterschmitt wrote: > Le mardi 09 avril 2013 à 13:03 -0400, Robert Simmons a écrit : >> > Hum, I didn't thought about that. So I think it would be possible to >> > have a secondary « branch » for the distribution including som

databases/sqlite3: update port to 3.8.8.2

The port maintainer has approved my update patch. Is there a committer available to look this over and commit? https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197285 ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/f

Re: squid 3.5 plans

According to the Squid website: "Provided for archival purposes only. Not intended for general use in new installations." This is marking all versions of Squid except 3.5 http://www.squid-cache.org/Versions/ I would recommend removing all the older unsupported versions except 3.5. On Wed, Feb 18,

Re: squid 3.5 plans

On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 7:13 PM, Nick Rogers wrote: > On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 6:46 AM, Robert Simmons wrote: >> >> According to the Squid website: >> "Provided for archival purposes only. Not intended for general use in >> new installations." >> This

Re: squid 3.5 plans

On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 5:41 PM, Dewayne Geraghty wrote: > Thank you so much for posting this link! Merging r275456 and r275502 > from stable/10 to my releng/10.1 src tree and rebuilding and installing > the kernel, means that I can once again manage squid 3.4.n via the rc.d > script instead of a

www/nginx-devel Name Change

The port www/nginx-devel should really be renamed nginx-mainline. It is definitely not the development branch as is explained by the upstream project. Calling it devel may cause users to avoid using this port over the www/nginx port. I have a detailed explanation of this in a bug report here: http

Re: www/nginx-devel Name Change

> Hi Robert, > > On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 04:52:58PM -0500, Robert Simmons wrote: >> The port www/nginx-devel should really be renamed nginx-mainline. It >> is definitely not the development branch as is explained by the >> upstream project. Calling it devel may cause u

Re: www/nginx-devel Name Change

Also, I don't believe that "bugs in new features" has the same meaning as "development". On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 1:46 AM, Robert Simmons wrote: > Here is a quote from the NGINX project: > > Which version should I use? > > In general, you should deploy the N

www/spawn-fcgi IPv6 Bugfix

Greetings, Is there a committer available to review and commit the following. I have approved the patch: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198483 ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd

databases/py-sqlite3 Fails To Install

This port is failing to install at the moment. Is there a bug in autoplist? I've opened the following bug report: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199021 Using make makeplist seems to work around this problem, but is suboptimal. ___ free

Re: New pkg audit / vuln.xml failures (php55, unzoo)

On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 12:47 PM, Bryan Drewery wrote: > I think the VUXML database needs to be simpler to contribute to. Only a > handful of committers feel comfortable touching the file. We have also > had the wrong pervasive mentality by committers and users that the vuxml > database should onl

Update to security/libsodium

I just opened a bug that includes a patch to update libsodium. Can someone who uses this port, please QA this: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200548 ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/fr

Re: New pkg audit / vuln.xml failures (php55, unzoo)

On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 5:15 PM, Robert Simmons wrote: > On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 12:47 PM, Bryan Drewery wrote: >> I think the VUXML database needs to be simpler to contribute to. Only a >> handful of committers feel comfortable touching the file. We have also >> ha

textproc/elasticsearch2 Update to 2.1.1

Is there a committer that can take a look at this update. It includes Poudriere QA logs, and I can verify that it builds correctly in my environment ( 10.2-RELEASE-p10). https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206107 ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.o

Re: textproc/elasticsearch2 Update to 2.1.1

Understood. I'm trying to follow the protocol of submit bug, then ask on freebsd-ports, and only after those two, ping the maintainer directly. On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 5:33 PM, Walter Schwarzenfeld < w.schwarzenf...@utanet.at> wrote: > It is a maintained port. It needs approval from the maintaine

Python 2.7.7

Is there an ETA for updating the python27 port to 2.7.7? ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Python 2.7.7

Is there an ETA for updating the python27 port to 2.7.7? ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: Ports that don't actually support Python 3.x

Beautiful Soup 3.x is Python 2.x only. From the website: "Beautiful Soup 3 works only under Python 2.x." http://www.crummy.com/software/BeautifulSoup/ On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 3:56 PM, Melvyn Sopacua wrote: > Hello, > > I'm coming accross a few ports that are in the tree as we speak, that do > not

devel/libffi and lang/python34

The default for lang/python34 is to use libffi from ports. The version in ports is getting old (v3.0.13). The current version is v3.2.1. However, the version that ships with python 3.4.2 is 3.1. Should the default for python34 be changed to use the included version (v3.1)?

Re: devel/libffi and lang/python34

I think the best option is A&C: to remove libffi from python and to update our port. The config choice itself can then be removed from the python port. On Thu, Dec 25, 2014 at 11:37 PM, Kubilay Kocak wrote: > On 26/12/2014 3:06 PM, Robert Simmons wrote: >> The default for lang/pytho

x11-servers/xorg-vfbserver depends on x11/xkeyboard-config

When I start Xvfb it fails with the following error: XKB: Failed to compile keymap It appears that xvfb now requires xkeyboard-config. After installing x11/xkeyboard-config everything works as expected. I wanted to modify the port to add this dependency, but I wanted to make sure it is correct. I

Re: x11-servers/xorg-vfbserver depends on x11/xkeyboard-config

On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 1:50 PM, John D. Hendrickson wrote: > Robert Simmons wrote: >> >> When I start Xvfb it fails with the following error: >> XKB: Failed to compile keymap >> >> It appears that xvfb now requires xkeyboard-config. After installing >> x

devel/ccache

Is there a plan to update the devel/ccache port? The new version has improved clang support. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@fre

GSSAPI and Heimdal in Base

When building openssh-portable, and enabling kerb_gssapi, but using the heimdal that is in base, it gives the error: KERB_GSSAPI Requires either MIT or HEMIDAL, does not build with base Heimdal currently What is the difference between base and the port of Heimdal? _

Re: GSSAPI and Heimdal in Base

earlier version of the ports system? It's > also helpful to let folks know what FreeBSD version you're discussing ;) > > Cheers, Dewayne > > On 17/02/2014 5:14 PM, Robert Simmons wrote: >> When building openssh-portable, and enabling kerb_gssapi, but using >>

Re: FreeBSD Port: squid-3.4

Not sure what the plans are, but I'm interested in the new version as well. On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 9:02 AM, Adri Koppes wrote: > Dear Sir, > > > > I was wondering if there are any plans to support squid 3.4.x via > FreeBSD ports soon? > > Version 3.4.x adds support for TPROXY and intercept using